$159.99 for wireless earpods

>$159.99 for wireless earpods
P R O G R E S S
R
O
G
R
E
S
S

Other urls found in this thread:

tardis.wikia.com/wiki/EarPod
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Doesn't matter.
Apple sheep will eat that shit up

jaybird wireless headphones run 80-200 dollars, and the price has been like that for years

anyone complaining about the price is dumb as fuck and not connected to the cost of decent wireless headphones

these also have better wireless technology than standard bluetooth and better microphone than any wireless headphones out

>100 dollar stylus
>160 dollar earbuds
>100 dollar battery case
What's next a 200 screen protector?

Forgot the inevitable
>"we at apple are also offering 1 wireless airpod for $79.99 just incase you misplace one. We have your back."

But they have Beats quality sound desu!

lmao poorfags

Apple is top quality at the right price

I make more than that in an hour. Seems a reasonable price.

And it's $299.95 for a pair of Beats Solo 3
Who the fuck cares?

>P R O G R E S S
>R
>O
>G
>R
>E
>S
>S

A CAR COSTS MORE THAN A HORSE FUCK TECHNOLOGICAK PROGRESSION :@@

> keep in case when not in use
> while in use, one side falls out of ear
> notice immediately because something fell out of your ear and no audio is playing
> look on ground and pick up

Android fags are worried about the users of these headphones because they are used to living in third world countries where the streets are giant sewer grates

>mfw my car costs less than a fucking horse

>Beats Headphones
>"Quality"

keks macfags are so stupid

Oh look at the hipster who hates popular stuff

My earbuds don't fall out, fuckboi. And if they did, they're attached to a cord, so they won't hit the ground.

Rather be a poorfag than a gayfag 2bh

You mean hates shitty stuff?

Beats are literally the Monster Cables of headphones.

you have never bought a horse

>kek

Why was Phil Schiller introducing the product and not the real product team anymore?

> trying to advertise a fault as a solution

How come you never see professional photographers using their iPhones to take photos?

...

>Good goy believe in the marketing schema

>putting shit in his ear, immediately after picking it up off the ground

itt : triggered assblasted GNU/NEETs

you will look like the most stupid ass nigger ever when they fall out in the subway and end up under a seat or in some difficult to reach disgusting space. have fun i guess, because everyone else will too, laughing at you

...

is bluetooth in any way deteriorating sound quality compared to wired headphones?

They are just as retarded as gaydroid fans, both group is autistic as hell

How come you never see professional photographers using their cheap chinkphones to take photos?

inb4 thiefs begin pulling them out of peoples ears and running.

Retarded faggot

Beats have good sound quality you hipsterbabby, expensive as fuck but still good sound quality, better than a similiarly priced sony

>wireless earbuds
>worth any more than $3.50

That's not a great comparison. All of the Jaybird Bluetooth headphones have shitty reviews.

Yes

>I only have to suck 4 dicks to get these

what in the fuck? who why? $160 is like a month of food for me.

Apple users don't much, due to lack of funds from buying the latest product. That's why most of them look like present-day Jobs.

You want to be that pedestrian with wired earphones??

Because if you're a professional photographer you're a retard.

proof?

don't eat much

someone on Sup Forums said so

>decent wireless headphones
heh

The technology cost is clearly not the issue here. The issue are the marketing behind them. Bluetooth has long been implemented and they sell stereo WAN streamers such as the CSR8645 and the RN52 for ages, and support not only firmware flashing, but the 4.1 protocol for low power BT protocols, primitive speech recognition, and hardware side equalizers. What these companies do is simply shrink them, add a LIPo and a entry tier driver with uncomfortable, plasticky tips and vents and call it their progeny. If one could open source a pair, you could build it under 10 bucks (the controller runs about 7), and this isn't even at bulk quantity. To iterate, there has been no headphones out there worth its salt, and building it on some proprietary platform at a premium is even worse of a deal than a regular Bluetooth headphones with known specifications and thresholds.

Okay? So what would be comparable for a COMPLETELY WIRELESS solution, with no connection from earbud to earbud. Are you googling you droidfag? Google harder because there are like 3 that exist

>Beats have good sound quality

Not according to every audio magazine ever. It's not even up for debate. Even the new Studio Wireless model is pretty shit. You can get better quality headphones < $100.

Android user here. He's right. Good wireless headphones have always been stupidly expensive.

There is a higher level of fidelity through an analog 3.5mm jack vs a digital signal.

Allahu' Ackbar.

See -->

>Beats have good sound quality

i dont even use headphones in public. i dont even like music enough to have to listen to it while im walking around and shit.

...

People that think Beats are the shit are the same Fucking hipsters you see drinking Blue Moon and Shock Top because they think they are microbrews.

>Apple headphones with bluetooth wedged into them
>Good
Pick one, my mindless friend. Not arguing that there are no good (and not cheap) bluetooth headphones out there, but 159 for the sort of headphones Apple shits out is painful.

Nonsense - Beats are shit, Blue Moon is tolerable, your a faget

>kind of tired in the morning
>riding the subway
>take out earbuds, shaky hands, drop one
>mfw 80 dollars gone for good

i like both those beers.

do you go anywhere else but outback, or are you a flyover hillbilly white cracka?

so..

you can either use the bluetooth wireless headphones that have lesser audio quality

or you can use an adapter that needs to be CHARGED to plug in your own headphones

also do the wireless headphones come with the device or you need to buy it separately?

>be me
>spend half my community college loan on iPhone 7
>know i'm going to lose my virginity now
>seen all dem fine white girls at starbucks
>pop dem AirPods in dem ears
>JayZ playin
>aight
>aight
>be dancin down the street
>uh oh
>i spot my arch nemesis jamal on da corner
>i turn an run
>goin about 80mph
>he pursues ,matching my speed
>AH
>muh AirPod fall off
>shit man dat costs as much muh part da rent
>decide to turn and rescue
>Jamal closin in
>i dive for my airpod
>darkness
>i awake in an alleyway with my pants around my ankels
>airpodsless

At that price I'd assume separately.

That's pretty funny, because both of those Beers are served at Outback.

>implying a wire is a fault

It's not bad price, to be quite honest. Though, I highly doubt I'd be able to keep them for awhile because I'd lose them in the first 24 hours of having them.

What are the odds they have zero bass?

Doctor Who was right

tardis.wikia.com/wiki/EarPod

kek

>not removing your kidneys

jamal lacks vision and iniciative

The sad thing is that no one could tell these from $3.50 pack-in buds in an A/B test. They're that good now.

Capitalism has failed because people are just too dumb.

>have to recharge from 5 in 5 ours
D R O P P E D
R
O
P
P
E
D

Hey! I'm very familiar with this product!

First off, the price is actually a lot lower than what I was expecting. The cost of materials alone makes profit margins almost nonexistant, let alone all the development cost this product has gone through (roughly five years). That's a lot of manhours and a lot of investment. I think they're pricing it so low to get people on board with a wireless audio future. Most people involved with the product were expecting them to retail as a luxury accessory for over 300$, based on what they are and what's gone into them.

They actually sound pretty great. I tried beats ages ago and hated them, but these sound good, and blow me away considering they're packed with electronics. No idea how they made it sound good with all that shit in the audio chamber area.

They fit really well in my ears. I couldn't shake them out when I tried. I feel bad for the people that they don't fit well in, because they're a dope product. Mainly if you've got the watch and the phone and can use the magical pairing to whatever you're playing shit from mode. It's awesome.

A lot of the product team was in the stands, but they've been working crazy overtime to get shit ready for today, so no time to rehearse and shit. Plus, switching off for all the different teams would have been rough.

No. DACs are in each earbud, and they're good enough that they sound awesome to me. I used to consider myself an "audiophile," I even tried out STAX 009s and those planar magnetic ones that aren't made by China. AirPods sound good to me, but maybe I can't perceive the difference because I have tinnitus, or maybe because I'm not a huge placebo munching faggot.

Apple corporate probably prefers to think they look like that because they're filling all their circles on their apple watches.

You're literally retarded. Analog transmission can only deteriorate a signal. That's why digital exists in the first place.

>4 hours
how can you even begin to damage control this?
I feel sorry for whoever has to update the shill manual for these

God forbid for someone to make new, expensive technology without any flack.

The Airpods look small as hell and you more likely losing them. I can see why they cost a lot being that small.

>What's next a 200 screen protector?
I know a dipshit that bought actually $200 iPhone screen protector like a year ago now
He also dropped his phone while drunk one night and it shattered everywhere

I'm this asshole.

4 hours of what?

I think the most legitimate concern is losing them, but having lived with them for a while, the case makes not losing them feel a whole ton more manageable. Plus, I never have to worry about tangled cables!

>4 hours of what?
I hope you're pretending

I'm not pretending, I don't know what Apple marketing is saying about shit. I haven't heard four hours anywhere. Five hours of continuous music playback I've heard, but if you take them out of your ears and store them into the case (which you would unless you want to lose them), they charge back up pretty fast.

C A P I T A L I S M
A
P
I
T
A
L
I
S
M

>analog

and this is why I literally never listen to a word fucking Sup Forums has to say.

>5hr battery life

What do you do that you need more than five hours of continuous music playback on a regular basis?

five hours of continuous music playback is a long friggin time. The most I ever listen to music is 60 minutes, 90 minutes tops. Also, 99% of all movies don't go beyond two hours.

People that need more than a continuous 5 hour charge are probably detached antisocial bipolar sociopaths.

Seriously, FIVE HOURS of listening to music is serious autist next level brain damage.

I skate longer than that every day.
>needing to charge your headphones
>ever

I work you leet piece of shit

>hipsterbaby
More like not a faggot that doesn't research his investments/wears it because it's "cool". You're literally paying for the icon.

FIVE HOURS
ONE HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS

I'm thinking if you're needing more than five hours while you're mobile, you're an edge case for sure. If you're lurking on your desktop, you might as well use the DAC you shilled for and use your audiophile cans, too. It's not like you're not allowed to use wired headphones anymore. People really love to hate Apple.

work? 5 hours straight, without a break? bullfcuking shit. first off, you're a chantard, that in itself screams NEETdom or lazy dipshit drug addled lazy fuckup.

WHAT WORK DO YOU DO?? What work do you do that prevents you from using a more stationary setups, and simulatneously needs you to work for five hours in a row, but ALSO doesn't require you to be able to hear safety warnings and have no buds in at all (factory work/landscaping shit). I hope you realize that this is a serious rarity.

Not him but I work 8hrs straight without a break

>People actually defending wireless earbud in Sup Forums

Techloligy died for this?

What next, wireless headphone?

Does your job require you to be moving around mobile-like all the time and still allow you to be listening to music while performing it? I'm actually seriously curious what sorts of jobs fall into this category.

Haha, you KNOW this shit will happen to you. But you'll still cough up the 160$ anyway and shill about how great the customer support was. Then everyone else will be laughing at YOU as you walk out with your empty wallet from the empty Apple store.

>listen to music for more than five hours with lightning headphone dongle
>phone goes dead because you can't charge it while listening to music
IT
JUST
WORKS

You can just use one ear and not be a retard in those situations.
In factory work I've done I could certainly use 12+ hours of battery life. Sometimes 20+ hours in a row.

>works 8 hours straight
>thinks browsing porn is work