Wow so the iPhone 6S can LAP a Samsung Note 7 in a speed test

Wow so the iPhone 6S can LAP a Samsung Note 7 in a speed test.

This is actually pathetic.
youtube.com/watch?v=3-61FFoJFy0

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DKGfuct01M4
youtube.com/watch?v=pBIPU8aCCgE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Flash_Storage
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

This has always been known.

And i7 will be even faster.
SAD!

Surely this is a joke? This can't be real...

Again: The resolution on the Note 7 is much higher than a 720p screen on an iphone so it requires more power to run

Christ how can anyone be this dense and bait this every day

I can't tell whos memeing who anymore?

Resolution: 750 x 1334 pixels (~326 ppi pixel density)

>GUYS IPHONE CAN OPEN MANY APPS IN 2 MINUTES
wish iphone had apps.

also calculate the time you spend trying to put anything on your phone faggot.

youtube.com/watch?v=DKGfuct01M4
lol

Holy shit never realised how bad iphones displays look people still buy these?

Apparently fanboys piss in eachother's mouths as a sport

No technical knowledge, only argument being "wow look how much faster phone X is, clearly it's better!"

> note display resolution: 9999999x9999999
> what your eyes can see: 720x1334
> what it actually downscales to: 360x665
Lagdroid just lags, touchjizz makes it even slower

>also calculate the time you spend trying to put anything on your phone faggot.
go to app store, click buy or download
>not calculating the time you spend escaping chinese cryptobros

A10 Fusion is 40% faster than A9

>my eyes can only see up to 720x1334
stop embarrassing yourself you blind cunt
>escaping chinese cryptobros
samsung devices just work.

>what your eyes can see: 720x1334

Reel in, your bait caught something

> implying humans can see pixels from 326ppi
jesus, are you a normie/spec whore?

this "b-but resolution!" argument is invalid, watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=pBIPU8aCCgE

>normie/spec whore
>grouping two polar opposites eachother

ravioli ravioli remove this cuckeroni

Look, i'm fine with QHD on my monitor, but it's absolutely pointless on a fucking phone

Reminder that the Exynos s7 is still basically the same as the iPhone 6s in speed.

Snapdragon cucks

It's 2016, normies and spec whores are the same thing.

Now let's see the jPhone run 4 apps on screen at once
My 3 year old samshit tablet doesn't have a problem with this so surely muh fusion core can handle that?

>guy in the video keeps saying the Apple A9 chip is lapping the Snapdragon 820
>technically that's not a possibility considering the sheer difference in architecture
>the iPhone is "faster" because the code is more optimized for the platform it's on whereas Android is like Windows and designed to run on basically anything

And that's the ballgame, folks. When you can optimize the platform for the code you can maximize performance and unfortunately based on how Android is designed and works (unfortunately) it's never going to be able to be as efficient as iOS is.

>2K
>not a resolution
>1080p
>not a resolution
>720p
>not a resolution

They are video formats, you idiots.

>They are video formats, you idiots.

With specific resolutions.
Completely appropriate to use them as shorthand for a device with a video display.

Also, iPhones have used NVMe based storage since the iPhone 6, which is an order of magnitude faster than android storage, especially when running off a shitty SD card.

The iphone 6S has nvme based flash storage , of course apps will load faster . Actual cpu/gpu performance is a different story though

UFS storage is faster in what matters, random reads and writes :^)

>>On July 7, 2016, Samsung introduced the first UFS cards in 32, 64, 128, and 256 GB storage capacities. The cards are based on the UFS 1.0 Card Extension Standard. The 256GB version will offer sequential read performance up to 530 MB/s and sequential write performance up to 170 MB/s and random performance of 40,000 read IOPS and 35,000 write IOPS.

This is laughable compared to NVMe.

RANDOM read and writes on an INTERNAL UFS storage, fuckstain

Why are appletards so fucking stupid?

Still no word on how much those things will cost though, I'm guessing they're going to be fucking expensive.

UFS is not designed for internal storage, it's an SD card replacement format.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Flash_Storage
>UFS is positioned as a replacement for eMMCs and SD cards.

Also, the iphone does not multitask.

Resolution doesn't affect the speed of the phone

Well meme'd

I have GLtools on my nexus 6p to make games run in 1080p if they lag :)

fucking normies on Sup Forums
app opening speed isn't affected by resolution at all.

your point is?

Logic no, paint time, yes. And that's considered part of the "opening".

this is like comparing a 4 GHz intel core 2 duo VS an 8370

most phone stuff is all single threaded, of course Apple is going to win.

Samsung and Qualcomm are both retarded

>he thinks his tiny bump in resolution is why his phone constantly lags and empties RAM contents every five seconds.

Android is a good OS but not in it's current state.

Google needs to stop OEMs from adding bloat, they need to stop carriers from adding bloat, they need a unified update mechanism that actually works on all phones.

Sadly they'll most likely never have any of this.

dont even waste your time is just a fucking idiot

The reason iphone is so succesful and has been for a decade is because Apple was and still is the only company big enough with the clout to negotiate with the major phone carriers and tell them they can only sell the iPhone if Apple has final say over what apps get preloaded on there. Google/Samsung/LG will never have this amount of leverage over Verizon or ATT so their phones will always be subpar.

Apple isn't magical, they're just big.

Compare it again after the latest iOS release that will slow everything to a crawl.

No one cares for fast you can paint a picture of a phone lmao

Who will save the mobile SoC market? QC clearly can be trusted.

Intel? AMD? Nvidia? WHO?