Why do iPhone normie's even try to defend their inferior screen technology?

>muh retina display
>human eye can't see over 300ppi
The human eye doesn't see in resolution, the higher the resolution on a phone the sharper things will be, even if it's noticed subconsciously.

Other urls found in this thread:

clarkvision.com/articles/eye-resolution.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

says the guy who says eyes only see 30fps and we don't need 60fps in games.

if 1440p is fine on a 25 inch screen, why do you want 4k on a fucking phone?

>The human eye doesn't see in resolution, the higher the resolution on a phone the sharper things will be, even if it's noticed subconsciously.
Do you even know how eyes work?

>The human eye doesn't see in resolution
It doe sin a sense: clarkvision.com/articles/eye-resolution.html

muh 1440×2560 on 5.7" is perfect. can't see pixels even if I try. iphone has dogshit res but at least it saves some battery.

Where did op say that?

The pixel density of a 1440p screen on a 5.5 inch screen would be less than 800x480, closer to 480x320. That's worse than the resolution of the original droid, is that fine for you?

I'm sorry, what?

Not him, but nice reading comprehension m8.

Ever wonder why flagship Android phones still get frame drops?

cuck

1440p on 5.5 inch is about 500 ppi
854 × 480 on 3.7 inch is about 265 ppi

I think what he means is that the pixel density of a 25 inch screen with a resolution of 1440p would be the same as a 5.5 inch screen with a resolution of 480x320.

None of these people do.

I don't sit 10 inches away from my monitor.

>I think what he means is that the pixel density of a 25 inch screen with a resolution of 1440p would be the same as a 5.5 inch screen with a resolution of 480x320.
So what?

Just explaining.

Also, it was the answer to this post:

"Retina HD"

How can you even defend those meme buzzwords?

How can you defend ridiculous pixel density at the expense of everything a phone needs to be?

Only turbo autists care about how things are called.