Why aren't you using Windows Server Core as OS, Sup Forums?
>server tier performance
>supports up to 4 TB of internal memory
>up to 64 10-core processors = 640 cores
>ZERO bloatware
>more secure than ANY version of Windows or Linux
>boots way faster than ANY version of Windows or Linux
>>more secure than ANY version of Windows or Linux
>>boots way faster than ANY version of Windows or Linux
Literally paradoxes
>still using an MS-DOS command line in a 2016 server OS
This is why Unix and Linux admins laugh at you.
unix and linux admins are gay virgins
>shitty filesystem
There are lots of reasons, but that's the biggest.
best interaction of the month so far
SAVED!
Laughed out loud on this one
Windows is only still prominent because of legacy support, the vast majority of which is for desktop and workstation software.
On servers and mainframes, Windows is just more expensive for less utility. People who need to use it primarily from the command line should be given free psychiatric counseling.
Because no "apps".
I rather use dos in text mode only than this bullshit.
This, windows server core is a versiok of windows.
>Literally paradoxes
please elaborate
see
What's with all the "why aren't you using [obscure windows build] as your main OS Sup Forums" threads lately?
doesn't answer any question(s) posed
How can something be faster than an entire group when it's part of that group?
I think you're taking his statement too literally.
You're literally a fucking retard.
>ZERO bloatware
>installs bloatware
>doesn't even use PowerShell
Good grief.
Enjoy fucking with your registry faggot.
I take all statements as being literal unless there's some sort of hint or outright declaration of sarcasm. Not sure why you'd behave otherwise.
you are literally retarded. Haven't set up core in a while but if you console into a core server it starts with just a powershell window, you can cmd.exe if you want to. can you name the bloatware?
>console into a core server
>bloatware
The operating system dumb dumb
Bragging that your OS doesn't install IE by default is like getting a medal for only eating 3 bags of Cheetos instead of 4. The tools you're using are utilities mirroring full fledged desktop applications, not the other way around like better OS's.
Any basic admin task is a fucking walk around the world with Windows whereas Linux it's as long as it takes for Google to load with a StackExchange answer to your question.
Also fuck you because I'm not learning PowerShell. I don't care about OO shit in a CLI language. The syntax is so retarded. If it's so great why is Windows installing bash now? Your own company is betraying you.
[autism intensifies]
>Also fuck you because I'm not learning PowerShell
>Windows sucks because I don't want to learn x syntax
>>Windows sucks because I don't want to learn x syntax
I 1000% guarantee I know PS better than you and you're still going to talk shit. Why do I need goofy fucking addons and shit to do SPO and Azure tasks? Why? That is B L O A T W A R E
Actual autism here folks
Sounds like you're just a mad Linux baby
Server Core is technically more secure than its Gui counter parts. There's less software to exploit with no Gui.
But is it more secure than itself?
How educated is Sup Forums exactly? Low enough education that you don't understand basic logic?
Are you stupid? Core is the smallest version of the operating system. How are you not aware of smaller code bases being less vulnerable? Complexity always adds bugs and insecurities. The Gui is a major reason why Windows always gets fucking riggity wrecked all the time.
>Windows server
>Useful for anything at all
Nice try, Pajeet.
Oh my fucking god you are retarded.
Did you read OP's claim at all?
>debating semantics like a fucking 4 year old
Good thing you're using a name, son.
>more secure than any version
Eat a dick faggot that's the whole purpose of this argument. Continue this pointless debate all you want but it's a fact server core is more secure than its gui version.
>B-b-ut it's the same os
big boys big board
let them play
>Core is the smallest version of the operating system
Not anymore. Nano is the new hotness...
>GUI major part of Windows infection
lmao dis guy
literally the same logic applies from my image in
Just change both instances of the word faster to "more secure"
>eat a dick faggot that's the whole purpose of this argument
Which argument? The one that was started with me when I claimed OP made a paradoxical claim? That's the argument I'm arguing. I don't give a flying fuck about Windows
no one gives a fuck, pajeet
KEK
>implying I'm wrong
another time you?
The UI alone allows for some viruses to get on a system, but a considerable number of them are Windows core problems.
As soon as a file is on that system, regardless of the way it got there, it can fuck WIndows so hard.
The UI is just one of the methods it can get there.
I don't have a server
I don't have 4TB of internal memory.
I don't have 640 cores.
I don't have any bloatware.
It is secure for servers which I don't have.
>boots
>implying my PC isn't on 24/7