Do people still get paranoid about someone using Google Glass around them?

Do people still get paranoid about someone using Google Glass around them?

What about five or ten years from now?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/jzysxHGZCAU
newatlas.com/sony-contact-lens/43157/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

What kind of retarded cunt gets uppity about google glass in a world where there are cameras on every fucking corner? I'd much rather a private citizen record me than a faceless government organisation. At least I know normies don't back shit up and records will likely be gone in 5 years. Can the same be said of government surveillance?

I work in a pub and we've had 5 or 10 people coming in wearing google glass. I always tell them that they are not permitted to film or photograph in the establishment without express permission, and since I have no way of knowing if the device is taking photographs or filming they will have to take them off while on the premises. All but one have heeded my warning (probably wasn't the first time someone asked them to do this) but one of them didn't. He kept filming and said he wouldn't stop because his eyes are cameras too or some autism like that. I took the glasses from him, threw them on the ground and stomped on them. He got angry and almost violent but our guards showed up to escort him out. He said he would press charges but apparently he didn't because we never received any letter about it. Either way he was pretty drunk so his case would probably have been dropped right away.

Statist cucks like you get off knowing the government watches everything you do.

You sounds pretty tough man. I think your new nickname should be Terry Tuffnut. Do you suit a Terry?

In all fairness, even if he was drunk he probably would have had a case.

Of course he has a case. The cunt snatched his property and destroyed it with no reasoning.

Doesn't matter what the bar rules are. The policy would be to escort the customer from the premises, not destroy his property.

You could have just kicked him out.

No, I'm just doing my job. The security guards are the tough guys.
Probably not. He filmed inside our premises without our express permission. I told him to stop but he didn't. I could argue that his filming posed a risk to the guests of the establishment, and that I had to stop him from doing it as quickly as possible, especially seeing as the google glass uploads shit automatically to servers god knows where. My boss agreed with me and thought I did the right thing, he was the one who implemented the rule in the first place.

>his eyes are cameras too

kek

It's a paid shill. There's a reason Sup Forums uses reCaptcha.

I think you'd be hard pressed to prove that his filming posed such an immediate threat that you had to confiscate his property and destroy it.
Your boss agreeing with you doesn't mean that the law does.

You can't destroy peoples property, you and your boss are stupid. He would easily win in a fair court. But of course you can just deny it and deny the camera footage too. You don't have the right and you're a fucking douche.

did that even make it to production?

Pfft, I'm no paid shill, but you go ahead and stay compliant man. I'm not a fan of glass, but it's the least of my concerns.

Tactic #423: Insincere appeal to moderation

It may be a stupid device, but really it wasn't that big of a deal. It's the same as people freaking out about drones. Stop fucking your livestock outside the barn and you'll be just fine.

>I'd much rather a private citizen record me than a faceless government organisation.

The guy deserved it, he could afford it, and honestly his case would never have held in court because of plenty of reasons, him being drunk and acting in a threatening manner being two of them. Give me a fucking break.

I want to know it's a pervert getting off to me and that I'm not just another file in a database.

I want to feel special.

how about neither? though the nameless citizen is more likely to be a danger to you than your government

>please record me a second time
You can take your sousveillance and shove it, buster.

Is this an elaborate ruse? No one owns fucking google glasses.

Who cares if he deserved it or he is able to afford it. You can't destroy other people's property. If he's not following the rules escort him out of your bar.

>shit that never happened

Boohoo, welcome to reality where people don't work their hardest to maintain your safespace and arbitrary set of morals.

Asshole

Except that it's not about safespaces or arbitrary sets of morals.
You broke the law in destroying his property, simple as that.
If he's not following your bar's rule, you escort him out. If he resists this and you can prove it in court, you might be able to justify some violence or destroying his camera.

But you didn't. You destroyed another man's property first thing, so you bet your ass he would have had a case if he had pressed charges against you.

>You destroyed another man's property first thing
You're assuming a lot bud. And work in a pub for a few months and see if that doesn't knock you off that high horse of yours.

People are still using Google Glass?

>I always tell them that they are not permitted to film or photograph in the establishment without express permission, and since I have no way of knowing if the device is taking photographs or filming they will have to take them off while on the premises.
I hope you ban phones from being used too because otherwise you're a fucking ass.
>I took the glasses from him, threw them on the ground and stomped on them.
Oh I see, this just never happened. You probably don't even work in a pub.

>You're assuming a lot bud
Not really, I'm reading that story of yours. At no point in time did you say that you attempted to escort the dude out of your pub before destroying his property. According to your story, you only asked him to go away.

But if you think the law is a "high horse" as you so nicely put it, then I'm sure you'll fuck up again in the future, so have fun dealing with whatever lawsuits might come your business' way when you won't have a case because you're a fucking retard.

You destroyed a man's $1500 prototype smart glasses,yeah, no big deal at all.

Lol @ this fucking guy.

you're an idiot


company policy doesn't trump the law m80

Do you stomp on other people's smartphones, cause they film other patrons?

Itt: a retard claims breaking someone's property because they didn't follow your bar's rules is okay and doesn't break the law

naw m8, i smash other people's cars when they speed, they should follow the laws on the road, right?

I've never seen anyone use Google Glass.

>it's an "I have no argument so I'll try the default damage control" episode

>I hope you ban phones from being used too because otherwise you're a fucking ass.
If they're causing issues, you can bet your ass we will. Most of the time they don't cause any problems though.
>Oh I see, this just never happened. You probably don't even work in a pub.
I'm actually a math phd from MIT working for the secret google-nasa alliance but I come here to shitpost and pretend to be a bartender making 15 bucks an hour over minimum wage on a friday night.
I didn't include every single detail of the occurrence, and I don't see why your autism compels you to assume that I did. Perhaps if I had known how upset people would be over a single destroyed spying apparatus I would have included in the story what I had for breakfast as well. As for the legal aspects, I see why someone who has never set foot in reality would believe that. I can assure you that we never risked even having to compensate the guy, seeing as he was drunk and acting threatening which basically invalidates any claim he would have had. As for the morals of it, wearing a google glass in my mind is an act of aggression in the first place. Asking him to take them off was a courtesy act as far as I'm concerned.
Sure I would. For example, if I caught some guy filming upskirts I'd smash his phone in a heartbeat, just as most people would I'm sure. I haven't done it so far though. If you doubt this, I think you should go to a bar and try it. And honestly, good luck pressing charges against the security guard or bartender who stomps on your brand new smartphone after you do it.

>I broke his $1k gadget and got off scot-free

>hehe, this'll make 'em so mad

Are the old Google Glass Explorer Edition sets still usable?

Is it useful if i want to use it to cheating on exam?

>still
>Implying they were to begin with

youtu.be/jzysxHGZCAU

Why worthless people care so much about their private life? Every smartphone user pretty have all of their history/calls/sms/GPS recorded. At this point it doesn't matter anymore...

Because I don't want some weirdo with camera to be blatantly in my face

I would rather have nobody watching me but if I had to pick I would want some automated street camera see me than some weirdo who may have chosen me as his next prey in a snuff film

Google Glass failed. Maybe it's just not ready for us yet, but I believe phones are more practical and MUCH better performance/power. Anything else can be done by a watch.

You have to tell it to record and even then it can't do it forever or at least at very good quality. On top of that you literally have to stare at what you're recording.

Or you can just take out your phone and record without notice. Take creep shots for example. So you should be worried about phones more.

Also, you do know people can just take out their phones and record you right? Not talking about a law, I mean they can just physically do that. And multiple people do it when something goes on. No one will record you because you're not doing anything. If they do, I bet plenty others will join and there's nothing you can do.

> Sure I would. For example, if I caught some guy filming upskirts I'd smash his phone in a heartbeat

Except that wasn't the question you fucktard. He asked if you'd smash a phone for filming people not up skirts.

Was the Google glass guy lying on the floor looking up woman's skirts?

[spoiler] it doesn't matter because this is all fake anyway[/spoiler]

>This guy is trying to ram his penis into my ass. He's poking against the fabric. Might as well let him. At this point it doesn't matter any more...

lol fag

That was fucking useful, cheers.

If only you knew what the future holds in store.

The funny thing is this isn't even a joke. There's already patents for contact lenses that can record.

newatlas.com/sony-contact-lens/43157/