What is more important: freedom or video games?
What is more important: freedom or video games?
Connor Rogers
Other urls found in this thread:
theguardian.com
twitter.com
Logan Clark
Freedom to play video games
Brody Mitchell
Microsoft Reich
Liam Stewart
The freedom (as in libre) to get your games (and all other software/media) for free (as in gratis) while abusing parenthesis (for no reason whatsoever).
Also known as Windows 7 Ultimate - Daz Edition.
Hunter Rivera
Why not both?
Blake Baker
Free video games
Gavin Hall
How is Linux more free if windows has a significantly larger library of programs?
Michael Jenkins
I have a headless steam box so I can game from anywhere.
Xavier Gutierrez
>tripfag
>unironically uses non-free software
>chooses video games over freedom
Kayden Thompson
>text based graphics
literally autism
Jason Cooper
NetHack is more complex and much more difficult, and fun than most so-called AAA games.
Lucas Flores
>dissing NetHack
Noah Watson
I always buy video games with unrestrictive licenses.
Ryan Price
>he's a grown man who plays vidya gaymes
Juan Fisher
...
Ian Price
I dont need linux to be free because I already live in AMERICA BITCH
Elijah James
>tfw you will never pahk your cah in your qt sensei's hahvahd yahd
Brayden Lee
Freedom.
Aiden Johnson
The freedom to play video games.
Kayden Jackson
>Nearly stopped playing vidya at 24
>Stopped playing now
Never thought it would happen to me but holy fuck video games sure are repetitive and designed for younger more ADD addled brains.
I still waste my life away, just on social media.
Dylan Bennett
My man
Roguelikes are great and have high replayability
Blake Barnes
this
Cameron Rodriguez
>being literally retarded
Kill yourself, shit stain.
Ryan James
Libre > Gratis
Free as in freedom nigga
Jeremiah Powell
Freedom
Colton Collins
Freedom, now go back to Sup Forums where you belong
Anthony Foster
The freedom to go back to Sup Forums
Andrew Sanders
Snippy crabs
Kevin Gonzalez
This question reminds me of when Sup Forums used to invade 2chan.
Camden Morales
The games are designed to make users keep playing — and, in many cases, keep paying. Unlike the games of 30 years ago, you don't just buy a copy once and use it as much as you like. In many games, players are pressured to pay to advance.
The fact that the games are proprietary, not free (libre) software, is a crucial part of the problem, because that enables the designers to maximize the amount they draw out of people, and gives them an incentive to make the games addictive.
The technology-industrial complex shows a general dynamic of designing things to be increasingly addictive.
theguardian.com