Why do you listen to meme placebo formats when modern compression is indistinguishable from "perfect" FLACs??

Why do you listen to meme placebo formats when modern compression is indistinguishable from "perfect" FLACs??

If someone shit in a 2000 liter container of peanut butter would you eat it?
>But it's 99.99% peanut butter, you won't notice the 0.01% shit in there.

Flac is lossless, storage sizes back in 2004 was enough, and if you don't have enough 12 years later something is wrong with you.

But I don't (:

You literally answered yourself. For placebo.

what does that pic prove?

>Modern
>Mp3 is around since 1994

> MP3
> пoпca

ITT: autism

That he's a retard who uses mp3 instead of opus or ogg

But i listen to Opus.

FLAC is for archiving.

I listen to MP3. I store in FLAC, just in case one day I get new hardware and it turns out I didn't hear the difference because of my current hardware's quality.

My time ia leet :^) (I just noticed, lol)

flac is compression you giganignog

>Using this bullshit analogy
Stop.

Eating shit

If FLAC is superior then why arent audiobooks pirated in FLAC?

My whole music library is in .flac.

Now I'm going through the arduous process of converting it all to .mp3 for my mp3 player. It can play .flac but it eats up too much space.

I actually can't tell if this is serious or bait the average Sup Forums user is retarded enough to say something like this and mean it

Oh god

Are they even provided in FLAC/Lossless? Prolly just 128 MP3/AAC to begin with. Unless it came on CD.

Such that I have an archive that represents the source material. I don't even convert for mobile playback as there's no shortage of flash storage space now.

lossless has its uses when you might be transcoding the audio for whatever reason.

>modern compression is indistinguishable from "perfect" FLACs
Found the poorfag who only listens to music via the free earbuds that came with the phone