ITT: we rank distros

>ITT: we rank distros


>based solely on how cool their logo looks

>Debian>arch>Ubuntu>gentoo>>>>>>>>>>fedora

redhat>opensuse>arch>mint>gentoo>fedora>ubuntu>the rest

open pepe > debian > redhat > dogshit > gentoo > the rest

Redhat>mint=debian=fedora>>>>gentoo>>>>>>>>>everything else but arch>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>shit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>windows>Arch

debian/arch > open meme > ubuntu > *buntu > distros i don't give a shit about

debian > gentoo > suse > kali > redhat > ubuntu >>>>>>> arch > fedora > slackware

Arch>CRUX>Debian>Ubuntu>>OSX>Gentoo>>>>>Mint
>only installed Arch for the logo

pepe linux best linux

my uni dualboots CentOS
how pleb are they?

Debian > suse > mint > ubuntu > arch > gentoo > fedora > xubuntu > mandriva > everything else

Didn't realise kubuntu had such a trashy logo

>no templeOS logo

absolutely niggerlicious

They all look shit to me

Gentoo has objectively the worst logo. What is it even supposed to be. a 'G', a painters pallete, a wad bubble gum?

debian wins, mod close thread it's not even a contest

pacman's retarded uncle

>Ubuntu on average for everyone


Huh.

Just like portage!

>best: arch
>worse:gentoo

SourceMage is best

slax best obviously

after that idk, mandrive is pretty cool but so are arch and debian. Red hat is also pretty fancy, rest seem sort of meh

Using an enterprise grade OS is not pleb

FUCKING KEK

Solus > the rest

redhat > all

IMO Ubuntu is the best distro but the logo sucks ass. I don't know why they don't change it.

>Bothered by the logo and not the name.

>they will have to call the budgie remix Bubuntu for sake of consistency

SourceMage is best

Debian, duh. It's the only logo that isn't trying hard.

>Mandriva
hi 2007

based on logo
redhat > ubuntu >debian > arch > slackware

I always thought it was a boomerang?

>Arch
>openSUSE
>ZorinOS
>Ubuntu Mate
>debian

>implying portage is bad

/thread

...

I like solus Kevin, but I can't program on it. Too many missing packages and I don't have the time to wait for them to be added.

sudo eopkg it -c system.devel

...

How can one man be so wrong? It's obviously
openSUSE > slax > mandriva > arch > slackware > fbresight > gentoo > *.

>What is Ubuntu MATE