tfw stock manjaro is more bloated than my riced arch

> tfw stock manjaro is more bloated than my riced arch

>uses less RAM
>thinks more packages = bloat
suicide yourself.

You do know how the Linux kernel manages memory right?

What does it matter?
Your pc boots up 0.013 seconds slower now?
Who cares?

>1920x1018

???????????????????

Yeah by using more memory when you're shits bloated as fuck, bloatfag

I do.

its a vm my nia

maximised virtual machine

**nigga

>A babby distro uses less RAM than your riced Arch
B A D

Packages are fine, if you don't have a shitload of packages you don't have a shitload of software. I like having a shitload of software on my PC. I could go to Synaptic and install another 100 tonight and it will not effect the performance of my system

It will affect the performance of your brain. You still need to keep track of all those packages.

upgrade you're 386 bro

...

pleb

WHY CAN'T I FIX THE SCREEN TEARING IN ARCH WITHOUT INSTALLING ANY SHITE

Can you point me to how to install something like that windows classic theme on my xubuntu thing?

I got one for XFCE can I even use it?

Google the Chicago95 theme

Kek, even my Fedora installation has fewer packages.

Install Fedora.

...

...

So its just a theme and it will keep the same RAM bloat and shitty animations?

Its using 29% of my ram idle

why are you so obsessed with BLOAT? It's not like you know anything about packaging or internal architecture. When you used windows you were thinking about bloat?

Lower number = better. Applies to everything this is an universal truth

Arch kids are fucking retarded, I swear

To be fair, it's not like you can reduce the amount of bloat in base Windows.

Except you can?

You can strip Windows to the point it has 1 service running (and it's completely useless)

>Lower number = better. Applies to everything this is an universal truth
>>Arch kids are fucking retarded, I swear
the Arch part may be true but you are pretty dumb yourself

Doesn't change the fact that a base Windows 10 install takes about 32GB of disk space.

>that shit topic again
Sup Forums never changes

>not even answering with a response
Seems like I said something you didn't like. Perhaps I'm right?

A base, clean operating system install cannot be 32GB.
Meanwhile, Damn Small Linux takes about 50MB of space.

>Seems like I said something you
>didn't like.
>Perhaps I'm right?
yes you idiot stated a fact, can't argue with that you stupid dumbfuck
don't pretend to be smart, cunt

what I'm on about is that it's completely irrelevant and while the size of the OS may not be justified and you have botnet paranoia stock windows with 32gb comes with a quadrillion more features than 50mb gentoo+loonix, that's why linux isn't targeted at normal people that value their time over some freedom of customization

we have this topic every day on Sup Forums
that's why I didn't answer properly to your troll bait

You just answered.

>linux isn't targeted
Linux is becoming more and more targeted to usability. It's just that normies don't buy laptops with Linux pre-installed, because companies don't install it on their systems.

And normies don't want to re-install an OS, even though many distributions have simpler install processes than Windows.

Freedom of customisation is very powerful, though. You can use a tiling window manager, floating window manager, stacking window manager that all change your workflow.