>Most of Apple's "disastrous" PR scandals are massively overblown just because of high profile of a company they are and because how high of an expectation society has for their products. Apple also has a lot of haters who will echo anything bad about Apple.
I don't dissagree with that, but again, in computer units alone, Apple has a vastly oversized bad PR and possibly more problems per volume when you compare it to other manufacturers.
>I can't think of a single castastrophic failure from Apple after the year 2000.
Are you freaking serious? Since 2000? Apple started the current trend of irreplaceable batteries, they were even sued for it.
There are, even without media involved, too many to mention instances of GPU failure on Macs rendering the computer into a paperweight, instances of batteries expanding or exploding. Instances of laptops burning people's skin where they're so freaking hot because "muh aesthetics" vs ventilation, you know, one of those things that quality products have.
>Dell sells more volume because they have more product lines, low-end, mid-end and high-end.
That is totally true, I picked dell because their consumer line isn't shit when compared to others. As far as the "This means a lot of trash, jack of all trades master of none." you can say the exact same thing for Apple.
> I doubt business grade HP and Dell laptops are comparable to Apple laptops, they probably don't have the trackpad, OS optimization, NVMe SSD and battery life.
You say that because you don't know what you're missing, if you have some money to spare buy a chinkpad on ebay, buy something cheap like a x220 or x230 you can get one for less than $200. Old Elitebooks and Latitudes are just as cheap, try em and see what you're missing. I am positive you will be amazed by the build quality alone.