If Arch Linux is meant to be simple, why doesn't it come with a simple installer?
If Arch Linux is meant to be simple, why doesn't it come with a simple installer?
Other urls found in this thread:
simple in design, not in funcionality
Arch is not simple. That "philosophy" comes from original arch which used to be simple. They've abandoned it.
Slackware is the best and most simple distro. Also, you can install it in 10 minutes while afk.
That said, not having an installer is actually very simple. I don't think you know what simple means.
That little entry barrier gives the users some sort of a "high horse" to sit on. I suggest Antergos. 99.9% Arch and it looks good and works OOB
Because it's the only way to force schoolkids to learn the command line interface.
>install arch and mate
>love it
>need to fix screentearing though
>install compton and compiz
>fix screen tearing
>now windows wont maximise and the DE is unstable
JUST
Anyone know how to fix this? I reinstalled mate, compton and compiz after uninstalling but it just went back to the same old mess
They used to have one. Not sure if anyone actually knows the reason they abandoned it. Arch-anywhere and Architect are both excellent Arch installers, though.
>>install compton and compiz
wut
pretty sure these are for the same thing and shouldn't be used together, get rid of compiz
Stop using Arch would be point number one.
ROAD ALAMO
>Expecting a DE to just work on Arch.
I suggest you use a wm or just install a blosted arch based distro with mate like manjaro, it will work properly.
KDE or GNome on Arch are just as good as any other distro.
Uninstalled it just now but I don't think that will help. I think I fucked up my changing the window manager in mate to compton but isn't that how you get compton to composite instead of mate thus giving you a complete lack of screen tearing?
fuck off
>fuck off
Wew, somebody's never had to face a hard truth before. Good luck in life, kiddo.
0765 Azienda
You really should at some point learn format you're drive using command line tools and to chroot and get some software working or learn how you can repair grub on an ubootable system.
Arch actually simplifies these things.
There's nothing hard about it.
Compton is a compositor, not a window manager.
There's a contravariance vs covariance conflict going on
Arch is ‘simple’ for the maintainers, which in turn makes it complicated for the users.
Ahhh I know what i've done now
I must have got mixed up and made mate use compton as a window manager which obviously didn't work as it's not one which has lead my windows to 'shatter'.
I don't suppose you know how to reverse this using the terminal?
here you go, newfriend
arch-anywhere.org
>Arch is ‘simple’ for the maintainers
is adding a simple install script too complicated for the maintainers?
For what purpose?
I dunno man, pacstrap seems pretty damn simply to me.
why cant i get ssh working i have everything installed but i keep getting connection refused
You're doing it wrong
no shit lol
Did you start sshd?
OP is a retard
Its ment to be simple thats not the same as to be simple to install
>You've reached the website for Arch Linux, a lightweight and flexible Linux® distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.
from the front page of archlinux
The core installation has a low footprint after that you can do what ever you want.
Also BTFO Arch! why use systemd if you wanted it to be simple
Antergos ?
sudo pacman -Syu
Thanks a lot troll, my xorg is trashed now.
A few days ago, some user asked how he could install Ubuntu in his system. He was saying that his installer was not installing grub on /dev/sdx instead of /dev/sda
The GUI installers are far, far less flexible than command mode installers. It literally leaves you with a fully working console so you can install anything in anyway, there's no restriction.
But if you think having an installer means it's "simple" (IDK why and how you can make that connection) go use the architect installer
Ignore this faggot; puppy is better
Or just stop fucking about with shit you don't understand