Russia Hacked The US to influence its election

Russia Hacked The US to influence its election.
why cant government workers, institutes, and politicians use secure technology? why isnt there a standard to combat this?

i understand theres day zero attacks and all. but cmon

Anything government should use Qubes OS as a standard. Qubes OS as its Server os or simply create a custom OS
Create Secure Proprietary Hardware and programs not accessible to the public.
DO not make major changes to these OS's or programs only security patches
this will lessen the chance of introducing a security flaw because windows wanted to add *insert stupid feature no one fucking uses* which turns out opens up security holes


has no one done this or wtf

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/2016/12/17/us/politics/obama-putin-russia-hacking-us-elections.html?_r=0
qz.com/862535/how-to-keep-your-home-or-office-safe-from-russian-hackers-lessons-from-the-democratic-national-committees-cyber-security-disaster/
youtube.com/watch?v=3BE95qqkTc0
medium.com/@VonEbsy/old-towne-media-llc-buying-a-political-revolution-40cbac5cb4c3#.s0e35idsf
observer.com/2016/08/this-political-consultant-made-millions-off-of-sanders-campaign/
slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/07/how_bernie_spent_his_millions_was_anything_but_revolutionary.html
americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/what_happened_to_those__millions_from_the_bernie_sanders_campaign.html
dailykos.com/story/2016/5/31/1532953/-The-Potential-Scandal-at-the-Heart-of-the-Sanders-Campaign
vtdigger.org/2016/07/15/sanders-campaign-millions-go-to-mystery-firm/
opensecrets.org/politicians/expend.php?cid=N00000528&cycle=2016
youtube.com/watch?v=Bmz67ErIRa4
americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/socialist_bernie_sanders_spends_more_than_his_reported_net_worth_on_his_emthirdem_home.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Trump won
Get over it

>why cant government workers, institutes, and politicians use secure technology?
But OP

Only terrorists use encryption.

God Emperor Trump is going to ban encryption so we can spy on Chinese men and mooslem terrorists.

thanks for playing

>democrats fuck over their best candidate for a whore with no morals and shit policies
>lose the election
>blame russia
American politics.

we literally look like jackasses. anyone can hack the US, soon enough its going to cost us pretty big.

this has nothing to do with politics

Fuck off shill Hill.

>Russia Hacked The US to influence its election.
wrong

>i understand theres day zero attacks and all. but cmon
no exploit. it was someone leaking shit on purpose.

>hurr hurr russia hacked
even anything, they just published the garbage democrats did, and withhold garbage against the republicans.

you know what would have been nice? if there were no garbage to leak.

>wrong
Whoa anons looks like this user knows something that the FBI and CIA don't

Social hacking with timed leaks and social media amplification. Technically correct, the best kind of correct. The ammunition for the leaks did come from the data breeches though.

But now what I really want to talk about. Why doesn't the US have deniable cyber-partisans the same way China and Russia do? Is it because our criminal class doesn't have the skill-set or because if you have the skills you can make more money elsewhere? It's like all the US has used is precision attacks.

The NSA should be broken up into defense, attack and monitoring. Clearly the attack mode is preeminent.

nytimes.com/2016/12/17/us/politics/obama-putin-russia-hacking-us-elections.html?_r=0
qz.com/862535/how-to-keep-your-home-or-office-safe-from-russian-hackers-lessons-from-the-democratic-national-committees-cyber-security-disaster/

>Russia Hacked The US to influence its election.
No they didn't. That's just nonsnese that LIBTARD KEKS and FAKE MEDIA are pushing.

top kek at all these leftists suddenly shilling for the CIA. 2016 was hilarious. I wonder what we have in store for 2017.

you think they fugged?

>why isnt there a standard to combat this?

For the military there is. They're called STIGs.
Ask anyone that has worked as a sysadmin in the defense sphere and they'll tell you about the pains we go through for STIGs.

But the weakest point of any system is the user. The DNC breach was started because a dumbass fell for a phishing email.
I would be willing to bet that ~99% of all breaches are user error.

Except I'm not a leftist, retard. I could tell you to search "cia fbi russia hacking" and you'll have dozens of sources but you'd deny them all because they aren't Breitbart.

what specifically did russia do?
Leak all the dnc's emails?

How is that russias problem?
Donna brazille gave Hillary the debate questions... But fuck let's blame russia

Why don't they just use Gmail?

The Russians can't hack Gmail. As in actually HACK, not social engineering crap or phishing methods.

Wow Americans just accept that Mr. Trump won. Deal with it.

>Donna brazille gave Hillary the debate questions...
Yea and Donna Brazile got fired from CNN, why are you acting this shit is mutually exclusive?

>cuck sanders

>best at anything other than taking it in the ass

unbelievable how reddit still worships this shitbag after he sold you all out.

so they are gonna get away with it?

don't want killary either, but fucking russia can't up and get away with this shit.

They got away with everything. They won, get over it. Figure out the rules of the new game and adapt.

>believing (((CNN))), funded by (((George Soros)))

Not really, anyone who takes Breitbart as a source is retarded as well. I'm not right wing either. Just think it's funny all of a sudden everyone trusts the CIA suddenly.

I'll believe it when the government presents some evidence rather than "X agency says X..." Russia didn't hack the voting machines, and I don't think that they were the source for Wikileaks either. Wikileaks explicitly denied that claim and they are a hell of a lot more reputable than the CIA. Even if Russia was the person who gave Wikileaks the information, then they intervened by... Providing the US citizens with true information about one of the candidates?

>proprietary software is more secure
No. Secure software is more secure.

Open software does not mean open scope of development.

Open software is just freely forkable.

>Trump's economic teams literally worked for (((George Soros)))
Really makes you think.

>hacked the US

I don't know that I'd consider John "The Molesta" Podesta falling for a phishing email "hacking The US".

youtube.com/watch?v=3BE95qqkTc0

>Russia Hacked The US to influence its election.

[citation needed]

What happened to pic related?

>implying anyone hasn't

no it didn't
fucking shill

I heard they're stilly on floppy disks in Washington.

...

Haha this guy's an expert on which information that federal intelligence agencies disseminate is legit or not

Explain me this, big guy, why do you have so much faith that counterintelligence is going to be transparent to the public? How in any fucking way does that make sense at all? If you ran a federal intelligence agency, would you be like "Well, we have to tell the American people the truth 100% of the time about what we're doing, that makes total sense?" Fuck off ctr

Podesta is a weirdo, it's not surprising he'd fall for a phishing scam. Remember when he said he'd do everything he could to get the government to reveal the existence of ayy lmaos?

Best part about Podesta getting phished is that he was initially concerned with the email, so he contacted the DNC techs to check it out. They assured him it was OK.

The idiots that got hacked fell for fishing attacks, the same shit that your grandma falls for, do you really want people that fall for that stupid shit running your country? these hacks were done by pissed off Bernie fags not russians.

"Ah shit I can't retort this from my retort bank, better just hit 'em with a meme"

HACK THE PLANET

According to WSJ they also tried to hack RNC but the RNC techs saw it and prevented.

>"You're wrong cuz I'm NOT that! Take my word on it!"
>"Take MSM - who it's been proven is the mouthpiece for federal propaganda in the hash-checked emails that weren't forged - as a source for all this totally real russia hacking shit! Ignore the content of the emails... RUUUSSSSIIIAAANNNSSSSS!!!!"
fucking faggot gtfo

Who are you quoting?

Debbie Wasserman-Shulz got fired, too. Look how well that worked out for her.

But really, she came out pretty good from that. So did Donna Brazille.

would be fine with it if it didn't have dire consequences to us and our current allies, just hope that pro ruskie posters have a dog in the fight and aren't just with them because their team won.

really have gotten too carefree after the ussr broke apart.

>equivalent of a first grader calling another first grader gay
>source your shit, cuck

That's what you get when you hire based on diversity rather than merit.

>wow this email in broken english says to go to virus.ru and give them all my passwords
>I better check with an expert to determine whether or not it's a scam

>Hillary hacked the US so Drumpf would win.

Get away with what? Show me evidence. A bunch of MSM articles vs verified emails and independent research into shit that was already online and out there... Fucking propaganda cuck

was about to post this

It still stings, doesn't it faggot?

not sure what kind of evidence would sway your mind, maybe server logs and emails?

and one would hope that kind of evidence is being combed through our intelligence, unless they are propaganda cucks too, and thus not to be trusted either? who exactly would be trusted then?

>They assured him it was OK.

From what I understand the tech guy realized it was a phishing mail and tried to warn him.

But instead of writing "it's illegitimate" he accidentally wrote "it's legitimate".

>who exactly would be trusted then?

random people on the internet
infowars.com and Sup Forums are the most reliable sources of information

It's funny that people are blaming hacking when Hillary won the popular vote.

infowars is below even huffpo and breitbart tier

> why cant government workers, institutes, and politicians use secure technology?
Because it's not as easy as you make it sound.

> why isnt there a standard to combat this?
And some protocols, supervision. and everything else needed to give you even just *basic* security against a state opposition?

Remember how you couldn't keep billion dollar military secrets secret?

You think way more understaffed, more underfunded civilian agencies can do it somehow?

> Create Secure Proprietary Hardware
Lel. That's like the worst way to design a complex system. Make it all secret. It'll have more security and sabotage holes than features.

I think it's funny how liberals were losing their shit when Trump said he wouldn't automatically accept the results of the election without looking into thing first. Then they got their collective shit pushed in by Trump and now they are doing exactly what they were giving Trump shit for and then some but I guess that is a normal operation for liberals.

M-m-muh recounts. Funny thing is Trump gained more votes over Hillary during the recount in Wisconsin.

There's nothing lower than the leftist lugenpresse. Infowars means well, as autistic and misguided as they may be.

>Russia Hacked The US to influence its election.

no they didn't

>who exactly would be trusted then?

Watch CNN and then believe the exact opposite of what they claim.

Not 100%, but close enough to the truth.

The jews wan the US and Russia to genocide each other so bad they can't even control themselves anymore.

I'm just waiting for the liberal media to start openly call for the extinction of the white race on national TV any moment now.

>source your shit
source what you fucking cuck

1. he didn't say anything that requires a source, he just insulted you

2. this isn't a fucking college essay, no one is required to provide sources when you're too lazy to google shit

>58051504

nice try ctr shills

>Why don't you just make it secure! Then it won't get hacked!

>Russia Hacked The US to influence its election.
Wrong, Assange was on Hannity's radio show just a couple days ago and confirmed not only was his source not Russia, but it wasn't even a state actor. That story from the UK Daily Mail about a pissed off DNC staffer mad about what they did to Bernie doing the leak seems to be the most likely.

The CIA has refused to meet with the House Intelligence Committee despite their claims, so there's no fucking evidence..

>why cant government workers, institutes, and politicians use secure technology?
If the current releases on how the hack occured are to be believed, then it was a social engineering click this bitlylink to reset your password level 'hack'

So there is little that can be done beyond not letting retarded old people use email for sensitive information.

I was happen when Trump won until I saw all the slimeballs he's putting on his cabinet.

Not sure what I was expecting though. I know he doesn't give a shit about lower-class or working-class people more than any other politician.

>I was happen when Trump won until I saw all the slimeballs he's putting on his cabinet.
Thanks for Correcting the Record, 10ยข has been deposited to your account.

you lost get over it

I'd honestly trust the humble water filter merchant and kikebart over huffpo and all the other MSM nowadays. They have zero credibility to anyone with a working brain.

I didn't lose, believe me I'm much happier to see Trump in over Hillary, but I don't know how much more Trump fans can go on believing he actually gives a shit about them without a single indication that he does. Everything so far seems to point to him being Bush 2.0 in him getting all his oil buddies in with him to start hijacking the economy for personal gain.

You guys want sources? Here's some sources, your precious cuck Sanders ran a massive fraud, routing $80-90 million in campaign contributions through a marketing company that is registered to a house in Alexandria, VA that lists NO employees.


medium.com/@VonEbsy/old-towne-media-llc-buying-a-political-revolution-40cbac5cb4c3#.s0e35idsf

observer.com/2016/08/this-political-consultant-made-millions-off-of-sanders-campaign/

slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/07/how_bernie_spent_his_millions_was_anything_but_revolutionary.html

americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/what_happened_to_those__millions_from_the_bernie_sanders_campaign.html

dailykos.com/story/2016/5/31/1532953/-The-Potential-Scandal-at-the-Heart-of-the-Sanders-Campaign

vtdigger.org/2016/07/15/sanders-campaign-millions-go-to-mystery-firm/

opensecrets.org/politicians/expend.php?cid=N00000528&cycle=2016


NO REFUNDS, KIDS!

I thought Sup Forums was liberal.

Obama was already Bush 2.0, just with a shittier foreign policy. Did you ever stop to think that Trump is just getting actual businessmen who know how to get fucking results for the the cabinet picks? You're just pissed because Rex Tillerson is da big bad oil man and all oil people are bad because hippies say so.

I'm also glad he picked Puzderfor Secretary of Labor. McJobs don't deserve $15/hr.

...

oh, the scape goat got scoped. Nah, she was acting independent, certainly nothing systemic there.

>they hacked the gibsons
youtube.com/watch?v=Bmz67ErIRa4

>implying any of these websites have any credibility whatsoever

I am hardly phased by neoliberals trying to discredit real voices for change.

Sanders was a great guy, but a coward.

He wasn't willing to sacrifice his and his families lives for the election.

She threatened him and his family, and he chose his family over the well being of the US.

I still respect him, but we need a democratic socialist leader without fear.

Death to cronyists and corporate cocksuckers.

Taxation is a blessing.

>people don't deserve livable wages
Oh ok, so you're one of those people who still live with their parents or grew up in a financially secure family. Good for you.

Don't think though that any of those people give a shit about the people at the bottom level. They don't. The benefits they build for themselves and the economy have nothing to do with the working-class people you seem to hate.

>breitbart isn't mainstream media
Uh huh. That's why they are cited by MSM in the same manner that MSM cites MSM

>Russia Hacked The US to influence its election.

>Not wanting to sacrifice his family's livelihood makes him a coward
Jeez man, you are a tough customer.

>tfw you'll never grab all those pussies

>a bipartisan commission of congress found substantial evidence indicating Russian meddling

Snowden said all the Hillary leaks were inside jobs by whistleblowers.

I trust him more than anyone else.

Inb4 le russia threatened him to say that meme

They don't, deal with it. Not all work is worth that much. Especially not flipping burgers.

They aren't, they're the boogeyman for the MSM that they can scapegoat as "fake news" just like this "alt-right" made up shit they're trying to pin on anyone who holds views that aren't either those of a progressive or cuckservative.

>he chose his family over the well being of the US

He did indeed.

americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/socialist_bernie_sanders_spends_more_than_his_reported_net_worth_on_his_emthirdem_home.html

N O R E F U N D S
O

R
E
F
U
N
D
S

>real voices for change

>has never changed anything other than post office signs

>found substantial evidence
yet none shown

This guy has literally been swimming in world class pussy his entire life.

As a democratic socialist, I like regulated capitalism.

There is nothing wrong with living extravagantly as long as you pay your taxes to support the necessary social programs and businesses pay fair living wages.

Him owning multiple homes is nothing wrong.

how do you leak a Gmail account?

Not trying to deny it but I'm genuinely curious. Did someone compromise his computer?

...

He should have let Hillary mysteriously suicide his family to expose the evil of cronyism, he should have called for revolution and the heads of the ruling class to instill fear into the next generation of government.

...

John Pedesta fell for a phishing scam. Think it was Gmail.

DNC had their own servers and probably not secure.