>"[W]e will seek to revisit [the disclosure] requirements, and the Title II Net Neutrality proceeding more broadly, as soon as possible," they wrote, referring to the order that imposed net neutrality rules and reclassified ISPs as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act. Pai and O'Rielly noted that they "dissented from the Commission's February 2015 Net Neutrality decision, including the Order's imposition of unnecessary and unjustified burdens on providers."
You only have yourself to blame for this, Donald memecucks. I guess you were too busy spamming memes to notice you were voting for our death sentence.
We're fucked anyway, better the US collapses faster and we start over faster.
Civil War 2 when?
Christian Butler
TIME FOR YOUR DAILY LIBERAL CIRCLEJERK ABOUT NET NEUTRALITY
GET THE LOTION OUT BOYS NO ONE LIKES A DRY RUB
Jonathan Gray
>Sup Forumslacks >having foresight >inb4 Sup Forums is always right It's all memes. Let it go, user. Also, someone here is samefagging.
James Williams
Yeah but at least he'll say RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM huehuehue
These rewards literally thought that voting for Trump would make people stop being SJWs, as if the president can control that. Now those types are just going to be more emboldened and seem relatively reasonable, and you'll lose freedoms on top of it.
John Brown
Nice argument you don't have there. Where didn't you get it, the not-argument store?
They sell pepes there?
Wyatt Rivera
We have this daisy chain every day. You fags act like this speculation is news or something
Jeremiah Gutierrez
>phoneposting You can do better than this user.
Owen Gomez
>TIME FOR YOUR DAILY LIBERAL CIRCLEJERK ABOUT NET NEUTRALITY
Name one reason why Net Neutrality is a bad idea.
What possible good thing could come from abolishing it? There are no upsides. At all. There's fucking nothing to justify. It's bad for EVERYONE that isn't Verizon, Comcast or Time Warner, literally fucking everybody else gets the shit end of this stick.
Carter King
Does it make you more mad that I did it while sitting in front of my computer?
Camden Edwards
>You fags act like this speculation is news or something
I'm sorry, some of us don't trust our government. Do you?...
why? I've never been given a reason to. Do they pay you or something or is being naive the new millennial trait to have?
Levi Allen
You miss the point. We have this same thread everyday, at the same time. Its a thinly disguised political thread. I could easily go to /pol or leftypol if I wanted to engage in political discussion. Half the thread yesterday was devoted to Obamacare.
Ryan Davis
It'd be fine if it were only memayms. Instead, Sup Forums became a literal shilling house for one of the worst candidates in recent history. With social security, medicaid, department of labor, education and energy all in serious jeoperdy, something like Net Neutrality is not surprisingly on the table. It's really sad to be on this sit
Henry Foster
Its not anything that is new. Its the same shit being regurgitated since the election. Can anyone tell me something I do not know already?
Hunter Baker
At the very least (and I mean very least), if this happens, maybe companies will put no focus on no-name websites.
Personally, I don't use Netflix, Facebook, Reddit or any major site. I just run home servers.
So long as that's not interfered with, I think some of us will be fine. That said, this really blows. It's just a bit too late to do anything about it at this point. The game's over. Might as well prepare for it rather than bitch now.
John Jones
I suppose it's just the internet reminding you of your past mistakes in November. This is the penance we all have to pay for hindsight, user.
Eli King
I think the point is to spread the information, not be a bitch because you're tired of hearing it. People need to care about this, not just sulk miserably about it or be unaware of it at all.
Jason Roberts
>4chains >no name We'd be on the chopping block mang.
Jaxson Cruz
Oh no!
Quick someone tell Slashdot circa 2006 I'm sure they'll be livid.
Easton Jackson
So net neutrality was the only reason to vote Democrat?
Ayden Turner
One of very few. But it's a very important one.
Ryder Moore
Why? It would be the only thing I agree with Democrats on. Im not a single issue voter.
Carter Wilson
Net Neutrality causes job losses
Brandon Scott
If you think net neutrality is the only issue being undermined, you must be living too deep in the partisan cave. Real issues require critical thinking, not mindless tribalist circlejerk.
Ayden Morgan
People on this site have gone from being techno-/crypto-libertarians to neo-fascist authoritarians all because of memes and a fear that wimmin are going to ruin their video games. Amazing.
Dominic Hill
>voting against self-interest
Why do Americans do this?
Wyatt Wood
No, it's newfags.
Luis Johnson
Go on...
Christian Reyes
You're assuming that the democratic default state is to be on the other end of things. Remember all those times people had to petition and call senators to get bills temporarily put on hold?
You've taken the bait and you think either team is on your side. They only exist to gut the economies further for profit of their friends and bosses.
Caleb Turner
This is why term limits are needed.
Josiah Nguyen
>Sup Forums has gone from being techno-/crypto-libertarians to neo-fascist authoritarians ftfy
Everyone else doesn't really care.
Jayden Perez
The redditors that come here for Sup Forums love to leak.
Henry Bell
>yurocucks talking about '''self interest'''
Levi King
>revisit [the disclosure] requirements
its literally nothing
Michael Hall
You can blame a lot of the current reddit / Sup Forums crosstalk on how gamergate was bungled by team4chan.
Jordan Moore
those greedy corporate pigfuckers gotta make lots of shekels
Cooper Rodriguez
>drain the swamp >literally drains your coffers and throws you in the camps
I can't wait to see the look on a Sup Forumsack's face when they're staring down the barrel of a gun.
Ayden White
Net neutrality only seemed to benefit Netflix desu. Users were still data capped and throttled. I'm sure this wont stop OP from posting the same thread tomorrow and the day after.
Andrew Moore
how can you guys honestly say net neutrality exists when major carriers already force companies like Netflix into bandwidth deals and pull whatever shit they want with very little blowback and small fines? Wireless phones are all completely exempt from the rules and a majority of people use those networks and nothing has ever been blocked on Sup Forums or otherwise. You all sent in mass amounts of comments last time, and you will no doubt do the same this time. They will have about no effect as usual.
Gabriel Torres
>all these butthurt leftists itt lmao
Josiah Rogers
There's a way around this... Find all the like-minded technologically-inclined people in your area and pick a location to all move to. Setup a mesh network and share a connection to Level3, Hurricane Electric, or another backbone provider.
Camden Anderson
nice retort
Juan Hughes
techno-/crypto-libertarianism was never a viable or realistic ideology. Fascism is much more practical.
Brandon Roberts
>being a single issue voter
Sebastian Turner
> It's a worrying about muh free (((porn))) is more important than the future of my people thread
Aaron Perry
So here's the deal, we can either have Title II, or we can make all of the "non-compete" agreements, local monopoly laws, ect. null and void. However, even if we make them void, there still has to be someone with enough financial clout to build out the networks needed to compete with comcast, verizon, ect. But because of their monopoly status nobody else has the kinds of capital required to build out a network of comparable size, speed, scope. If we void the agreements we would also have to nationalize the telecom infrastructure. There are going to be problems coming either way, just realize that we are going to be hip deep in bullshit from both sides for the next decade.
Jonathan Bailey
who cares. privacy was killed years ago. also there is no good media to pirate anymore.
Jaxson Mitchell
...
John Reed
in 4 years when kanye gets elected we'll just enforce net neutrality again. Because that's how politics is done now: every administration repeals what the previous administration did.
I dont understand how americans be retarded enough to want ISPs to meddle with their internet usage. What kind of retard do you have to be to think the word "neutrality" is ever bad?
Dominic Carter
fascism mostly pertains to refugees and shiet, most of Sup Forums (and Sup Forums ) is still libertarian
lots of unironic ancapers as well.
Ian Long
Why do Republicans just try and ruin every good idea?
Levi Gonzalez
>all internet traffic will be treated equally Unless it is from a source that challenges their political narrative. People are getting arrested in Germany for talking bad about rapefugees.
Nathaniel Adams
Network Neutrality is 100% on topic for this board.
If you don't like it, just ignore the thread. Just walk away from the screen. Just close your eyes.
Austin Thomas
that has nothing to do with net neutrality, the ISP didn't hinder the internet traffic they needed to make those posts, and that's how it should be
whether saying stuff like that should get you in trouble is a whole other topic
Austin Lee
it's anti-business
Mason Allen
You're clueless my dude.
Nolan Robinson
Not a chance.
ISP's aren't just going to just throttle the squeaky wheels. They're going to throttle EVERYTHING, including VPN traffic, except for the specific companies that they happen to have a stake in or that have paid them extra.
Lincoln Barnes
Actually unregulated business is anti-consumer and anti-business. Unregulated business just ends up being regulated by the first businesses that make it big and they act as gatekeepers for any new businesses that would challenge their place in the market.
Wyatt Gutierrez
I hope they do it. Just imagine the tears on reddit that day.
Elijah Gonzalez
lol no. tyrannical state meddling by obama that created ISP monopolies is why we have no new competitors entering this market, if all regulation was removed we'd have 100s of new ISPs.
Gabriel Scott
Comcast already throttles ssh connections.
Nolan Hernandez
can we please stop using the word regulation as a sort of black and white thing? There are different things to regulate, different levels of regulation, and different ways of doing it all.
I think the govenrment should regulate just about everything in terms of forbidding companies from ripping people off: no throttling, no discrimination, no deception, etc. Everything outside the realm of customer abuse should be part of the free market and competition
Nathaniel Myers
Meddling by state and local governments is what has caused shitty regional monopolies. They'll still be meddling even when the FCC decides to stop being competent. These regional monopolies predate Obama.
Caleb White
>no discrimination
cuck
>They'll still be meddling even when the FCC decides to stop being competent.
not once trump disbands useless tyrannical regulatory agencies like the FCC and EPA
>These regional monopolies predate Obama.
they were put in place by the pedophilic proto-obama clinton
Carter King
Government regulations are useless and don't prevent anything you listed
Charles Morris
>don't want a company telling me what I can and cant do from a moral/political point of view like criticizing refugess >this makes me a cuck gtfo troll
they're typically called laws, user. Many forms of abuse are illegal already, it's odd that companies can still get away with so much of it, so we need more of those protections
Colton Foster
What death sentence? My internet has been getting slower, they've now added data caps and throttling nation wide, they secretly raise the price every year for me. How could it get worse? Thanks but no thanks libtard faggot. I'll trust the Don to increase competition in the ISP sector to fix this mess that you and Obongo have created.
Caleb Stewart
>it's odd that companies can still get away with so much of it, so we need more of those protections Is this satire? >these laws don't seem to be working better make MORE
Easton Sanchez
they don't work because either they dont cover shit or they are not enforced properly
this isn't fucking rocket science, make more if they are lacking or enforce them better if theyre not enforced well
do you muricans need every fucking obvious thing spoonfed to you?
Samuel Bennett
How should they be enforced then? Let me guess, MOAR FINES. What would even take for you to accept that they are ineffective and that government regulations are not the answer to everything?
Gabriel Williams
the US isn't a socialist nation where the state has to tell businesses how to operate. businesses operate how they please and the market decides who wins and who loses.
also, you need to be 18 to post here.
Justin Collins
letting companies freely abuse customers however they want without fear of repercussions is a better idea to you then?
you gotta make SOME shit illegal, user. I don't run that shithole of a country you're in, you figure out what it takes to get those degenerate companies you have to deal with to obey the fucking law and general good ethics
Elijah Rogers
>making morally criminal shit illegal = telling businesses how to operate getting tired of all the false equivalences thrown around here, fucking arguing with toddlers
Lincoln Flores
I love the assumption that being against ineffective regulation = letting companies freely abuse people. You're completely incapable of seeing outside the tiny little box you've put yourself in.
Jonathan Richardson
Not him, but sooner rather than later monetary policy might actually become politicized.
either there is regulation/laws, or there is not. You can't not have any because then anything is allowed. You need to have some. If they're not working as they are now, figure out how to do it better then.
PS: like I said before: yes, the free market should decide. Some shit they could pull should just never, ever be allowed, just like it isn't fucking legal to kill someone for no reason. The government should ensure unacceptable shit is made illegal and leave the rest to the market
Colton Allen
>I don't think randomly killing people should be illegal because muh statist cucks, small gubmint is better
Nathan Gomez
>meanwhile in canada kek, americans cucking themselves once again
Anthony Williams
it doesn't need to be illegal because it's common sense, just give everyone a right to defend themselves
Dominic Turner
People won't just start slaughtering each other in droves without the state. Murders will still happen just like they do even with all the laws and money spent on law enforcement.
Christian Martinez
>it doesn't need to be illegal because it's common sense just wow, wtf is this kind of thinking
>oh you killed someone on the street for no reason? shame, shouldve defended better, go home now
>People won't just start slaughtering each other in droves without the state that is true. Now apply this to businesses: >companies won't just start abusing customers who dont know better or dont have the powr to fight it in droves without the state yeah, sure, companies are you friends and they're looking out for you of course
i'm out, this is pointless, you guys just want the world to be the wild west again
Anthony Jackson
No the media changed the argument and no other party other than the "victims" had the chance to correct the "official" narrative.
Camden Sullivan
Is this a joke?
Shit, US is really a shit country.
Oliver Harris
It's not anarchy you need to worry about, it's the local warlord that rampaged through your city and killed or forcibly exiled anyone who refused to submit to him.
Power abhors a vacuum.
Logan Brooks
Believing that gamergate was blameless is part of the problem. All the MSM had to do was wait, and people flying the GG banner gave them more than enough material to run with.
This is an unavoidable problem with a decentralized movement. GG would have been much better off with some sort of actual structure, with people in charge and more importantly some accountability.
Blake Richardson
How can you possibly tell if someone's posting from a phone?
Michael Diaz
technology in the 21st century ensures that were not going to see any more revolutions from the people. this I it, the end of the line for freedom
Ethan Walker
you're spreading it until it becomes different information though
Logan Brown
"rewards" in place of "retards".
Jeremiah Wilson
I don't like how most people don't understand what net neutrality even is.
Current internet is like a city street. Non-neutral internet is a street where you might pay to walk more or less past certain buildings, and the sidewalk isn't consistant.
Robert Russell
Who fucking cares.
Lincoln Miller
I'd say I'd guess we can hope for a massive solar flare, but that would cause nuclear systems to fail and probably end in human extinction.
Ayden Martinez
The EPA is extremely important if you don't want to end up with china core air quality you rightwing fuckwit.
Caleb Long
Very true and good points user.
Camden Perry
Wrong board
Joshua Walker
you guys know that net neutrality under tittle 2 only went into effect in june 2015. It's not like the internet sucked before that.
I don't remember the epa outsourcing our dirty air to china.
