Crushes everything except the 6900k in brute calculations

Crushes everything except the 6900k in brute calculations.

AMD Ryzen to the top!

>cores and clockspeeds blurred
>again
Pic related for this thread

Give us the link moron.

I found it on hardocp.com, but the results are from www.cpchardware.com.

...

>AMD's new 16 thread CPUs lose to 4 thread Intel CPUs in gaming
Zen is finished.

>8c 12t barely faster than 6c 12t in multi threading
>shit ipc
>can't handle ram faster than 2400


lol

it has got the jidf scared atleast. I've haven't seen the intel shill team this active in a long time

Jewtel finished and bankrupt

>8c/16t
>Beats everything but the 8c/16t competition

WOW
AMAZE

Question is, how much higher can they go with the clockspeed? If it's very limited, they might have a problem, or they can sell it to poorfags at a good price point much like the rx470/480

>performs worse than a i5 6600
I wouldn't pay more than $150 for it

>ES
>beta motherboard
>1Ghz lower clock

Disfigured baby with down syndrome still isn't going to win any beauty pageants when it grows up.

Actually would be hilarious if Radeons would perform better with Ryzen.
Would make sense since overhead is still there, it's a lot better than couple years ago though.
can driver team theoretically make it run better on AMD cpus? they probably didn't even consider doing it since nobody plays on 8350

you are comparing alpha version to complete release

The ES has some bugs with SMT enabled too.
Performance of consumer chips will be marginally higher.

The base clock of the consumer chips will be 3.4ghz at a minimum.

You really think they've made major revisions to the silicon since this? They are already well into production if they expect to release any time in Q1.

Why do you pretend you have some kind of insider information? You know as much as we do about the retail clock speeds - absolutely nothing.

from when do you think that sample?
samples been around since october 2015, at least rumors about it started then

did you miss conference? why would they announce 3.4 base clock and then change it to 3.0?

>this fallacy again
The guy who tested the sample said there is an SMT and uop cache bug. The chip was rated for a 3.5ghz turbo, but never went above 3.4.
The motherboard itself was a pre production sample and had a host of issues.

This A0 rev chip was fabbed in June this year.


Amazing how much of a pretentious faggot child you are considering you're so laughably uninformed.
The CEO of AMD explicitly stated that Ryzen CPUs would have a bare minimum clock of 3.4ghz.
Honestly go slit your wrists wide open. You should die.

...

AMD users are mentally ill.

>getting this upset that you much hyped chip turns out to be shit
>b-but they wouldn't lie to me!
I think you need a time out little billy

>I got caught talking out of my ass
>I'll resort to childish shitposting

You legit should die.

6 months old and you think literally nothing has changed with the silicon?

At the very least they've improved base clocks 350Mhz and boost 300Mhz. That's an 11% and 8% increase respectively.

:^)

>8c 12t barely faster than 6c 12t in multi threading
it's also barely slower than the $1100 6900k despite not having final clocks
>shit ipc
same as Broadwell
>can't handle ram faster than 2400
neither can any Intel CPU