Firefox now has FLAC support

You jelly, Chromebabbies?

Post your FLACs.

my.mixtape.moe/tqrsus.flac

Other urls found in this thread:

my.mixtape.moe/ntcvde.flac
my.mixtape.moe/zofvik.flac
my.mixtape.moe/camaxz.flac
my.mixtape.moe/vaaqql.flac
chiru.no
chiru.no:8081/stream.flac
my.mixtape.moe/scvkmo.flac
my.mixtape.moe/lhkoqe.flac
my.mixtape.moe/wtxyff.flac
my.mixtape.moe/nnczbg.flac
my.mixtape.moe/yvktco.mp3
my.mixtape.moe/sqfrur.flac
my.mixtape.moe/lvsiwk.flac
my.mixtape.moe/evpogh.flac
my.mixtape.moe/vkhihu.flac
my.mixtape.moe/offgxx.flac
makeuseof.com/tag/play-flac-audio-files-google-chrome/
my.mixtape.moe/exblzm.flac
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

checked
my.mixtape.moe/ntcvde.flac

Oh, they added yet another """""feature""""" no one will ever use? They should just let Firefox die a peaceful death instead of fucking it up even more.

my.mixtape.moe/zofvik.flac

CRHOMEBABIES BTFO AHAHAHAH
LMAO
QUICK DL FIREFOX BEFORE THEY CHARGE YOU FOR IT

Chrome users will never hear this

my.mixtape.moe/camaxz.flac

You're new to computers son?

No, I'm not. Please enlighten me why I would need support for FLAC in my web browser, as well as link me a non-meme website where this """""feature""""" is actually used.

Pretty cool

whos gonna make flactube?

>why
Better quality audio

>link me a website
Any site that accepts file uploads

i cant notice a difference

halp

Moonman songs are all shit quality to begin with

my.mixtape.moe/vaaqql.flac

cool

IT'S NOT FUCKING FAIR

chiru.no
Select flac.

chiru.no:8081/stream.flac

my.mixtape.moe/scvkmo.flac

my.mixtape.moe/lhkoqe.flac

I'm guessing this works with ffplay?

my.mixtape.moe/wtxyff.flac

>any site that accepts file uploads
I don't know man Sup Forums doesn't seem to supports flac

this is pretty sweet!

is youtube going to start packaging this for a audio?

Please enlighten me why I would need support for webm/gifv in my web browser, as well as link me a non-meme website where this """""feature""""" is actually used.

Why would I do that? I'm not the one bragging about my dying browser and its """""features"""""

its loseless?

no bit-loss?

Nice try cuckfox fags but chrome will be getting FLAC in next release. Have fun waiting for working engine till the end of 2017

hows ff in the process of death?

they just got a bunch of donations and theyre focusing on new standards like lets encrypt because google doesnt like to keep up with certificates.

also about:config alone is supperior then anything chrome has to offer

plus there is plenty of gnu gpl licensed addons.

they have been kicking flash out with html5 and have started rust too

>plus there is plenty of gnu gpl licensed addons.
Which will all die with firefox 57

forcibly.

if firefox didnt exist chrome would still be using flash and google would of switched youtube to html5
and youd have year old certs for websites that are "secure" by googles standards

you need us!

(citation needed)

iOS killed flash, not firefox. Stop being delusional.

they tried in like 09-10

how many years did it prevail?

adobe is actually picking it back up under another name!

>hows ff in the process of death?
Look up Firefox 57.

and that still doesnt deny my earlier statement

firefox not only cares about its users but the standards of the internet as a whole!

google only cares about their best interests and using their own infrastructure

care to elaborate?

It only survived on shit proprietary sites as a form of DRM media playback (same as silvershit did). Flash sites vanished from Internet very quickly with advent of mobile. Stiv Job is to be thanked for death of flash

You forget about firefox being literally adware now with new tab page and it being heavily tied to google for most of it history due to sponsorship deals.

FF57 will drop XUL addons in favor of chrome style addons

new tab adware?

you can entirely remove the new tab backround bro...

thats the point of firefox is customization!

and "chrome styled" doesnt entail their license they publish under...

thats up to the person who creates the addon.

and if you want to talk about dependancies on google..

chromium is under far greater leverage then firefox

i wouldnt call netflix a shitty site.

they had silverlight or flash up until early last year i think

Never did I implied that it is not. I'm not pro chromium, I'm against people being delusional about firefox.

well i appologize for assuming you were

youd say im delushional?

im just tired of seeing threads about how firefox is dead and everyone shilling for chromium

when in reality they both need eachother and at the moment firefox has been more giving to the linux community
and not always fighting against us

>Forces you to use proprietary software
>Sucks Hollywood dick
>Actively prevents people from buying content based on their place of origin
Netflix is great.

i was implying in a revenue sense..

the fact is they drove paid streaming and are actively in competition with traditional cable

im just saying they arent some ancient shitty site that no one uses.

>hows ff in the process of death?
Focusing on stupid SJW things instead of actually improving their browser.

>they just got a bunch of donations
So? They have $100M+ yet Firefox is complete shit.

>also about:config alone is supperior then anything chrome has to offer
Barely anyone uses it, and what does it offer that Chrome does not?

>they have been kicking flash out with html5 and have started rust too
Rust is a meme language and HTML5 is a web standard by W3C so it has nothing with Mozilla to do.

i use firefox but this is really useless. they have issues they should attend to instead useless shit like this.

about:config

gives you complete control!

it doesnt matter if only a few use it you can literally do anything.

thats what all the addons do they just change about:config settings

the search bar honestly makes it too easy


when i use chromium i feel like im restricted to what google wants me to do and i dont have those options

i can change every bit of my UI

its really great for tinkering and optimizing

if you for example have a LFS id suggest to mess with about:config for a couple weeks

you could even make your own fork like icecat or iceweasel

my.mixtape.moe/nnczbg.flac

>what does it offer that Chrome does not?

neo Sup Forums in the wild

Is it really not possible to whitelist JS without a dumb add-on?

ahh, my lenovo speakers or 7$ sony earbuds will profit from this!

now i remembered i don't listen to music bc i'm not in high school.

as already stated before its not about sound quality its about having lossless bits

(copy cd to usb in 90s and listen to it now)

itll have degraded

these algorithms preserve the bytes and prevent loss of data

this can be packaged with a video codec into a package like mp4 for example

this will go along way for a new standard and will increase survivability and archival of future sound

(imagine historical moments like jfks inaguration)

we need to preserve the sound for long term storage

the next step is a lossless video codec to surface

theres currectly some competition in that department

people also need to stop using jpg for example for static images

Why would I want to play audio files in my browser?

>what does it offer that Chrome does not?

meme ricing features. that's literally it.

The biggest audio video archive Google doesn't care about that

>(copy cd to usb in 90s and listen to it now)
>itll have degraded

what?

Oh you fucking hateful little shit. How dare you question mozillas decisions. You fucking sexist homophobic piece of shit. We are coming for you and all other natzis, you just fucking wait.

>Better quality audio
Implying out can actually hear a difference between MP3 v0 and lossless FLAC

Audiophool detected. Post an ABX test or GTFO. They are sonically indistinguishable

Chrome already plays flac, dumb freetard

Is there a decent html audio player (for local music)?

Not the user you replied to.

I have found several songs where I can reliably distinguish between 320 CBR mp3 and flac by listening to specific parts several times.
They are practically identical for casual listening but saying that they are indistinguishable is simply wrong.

Huh? I've been playing FLACs in firefox forever.

Shilling an open source product that has gone to shit should be illegal in every way

In firefox stable? if so that's impressive.

Yea, I'm just gonna continue with my 128kbit mp3 and 70% jpg.

But you have fun.

Why don't they just use an external library for media playback?
It would reduce bloat by putting video playback in its own libaries, but would allow you to play anything.

I wish KDE was still a thing.

...

Security.

wow chrome users are missing out!!¡!¡!11 fags!!¡1

On a PC it doesn't matter so much but the difference is fucking night and day in my car where I actually listen to music loud enough for quality to really matter

I hate anti-quality fags because the problem lies entirely with them
>Hurr who needs remuxes yiffy is fine
Your TV is shit, too small, or both. Stop pretending you have authority to have opinions on video quality
>Hurr on my iPhone I can't tell the difference
You're listening from a cell phone, of course you won't be able to tell the difference because the ceiling for quality is extremely low
>Hurr 30fps with drops is fine for games stop being autistic
Your eyes and brain don't work properly, seek medical attention

>Still meming bitrot

I already have a media player.

Still runs like shit.

my.mixtape.moe/yvktco.mp3

+1.

my.mixtape.moe/sqfrur.flac

my.mixtape.moe/lvsiwk.flac

It's good having the superior quality of FLAC in a web browser.

my.mixtape.moe/evpogh.flac

my.mixtape.moe/vkhihu.flac

my.mixtape.moe/offgxx.flac

You probably won't read this and will feel smug still falsely believing Chrome doesn't support FLAC, but it does. I'm playing a FLAC song right now.

makeuseof.com/tag/play-flac-audio-files-google-chrome/

Cute browser, Mike

Thanks, I try. :)

>logged on
>pushbullet
what the fuck is wrong with you, fucking retard

The botnet makes me feel good. It's... it's like a blissful, euphoric drug that encompasses all of my mind and body. Everytime I'm away I can feel it pulling me in, and if I just relax and let it have me, I can't help but lose myself in the bliss.

Why would Flac support matter?

You'd just download them anyways and use whatever to play them.

I listen to them in my browser just like mp3s though.

I opened your link to check if Chrome actually can't play it and it completely froze it and bumped the RAM usage to ~6GB.
What the fuck lad

That means Chrome is working properly.

>feature was just launched
>wants us to show you a big website that uses it

You need to buy Audiophile™ headphones for that, user.

See

That's cool and all, but it also dropped support for audio that isn't pulseaudio, which is fucking disgraceful.

Why force me to use that shitty bloat on top of alsa? Alsa works perfectly fine and pulse adds NOTHING.

my.mixtape.moe/exblzm.flac

Is there an extension that I could use to use Firefox as a local media player?

Not the user you replied to.

Post an ABX test or GTFO.

Also, instead of doing it with MP3 V0, use OPUS @128k

Seems that support hasn't rolled out to the lincucks yet, I'm on Version 57.0.2987.21 beta and it just wants to download the file.

Download the file and drag it into the tab bar.

>Chrome using less than 1TB of RAM

Are you a wizard?

That might as well not even support it at that point. I want to be able to click the link and it play in the browser similar to how an mp3 or webm do.