THANK YOU BASED INTEL

THANK YOU BASED INTEL

Other urls found in this thread:

forbes.com/sites/antonyleather/2017/02/09/amd-ryzen-prices-revealed-massive-blow-to-intel/#c8d05236e7c2
anandtech.com/show/11112/intel-to-equip-fab-42-for-7-nm
www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/47301.wss
globalfoundries.com/newsroom/press-releases/2016/09/14/globalfoundries-extends-roadmap-to-deliver-industry-s-leading-performance-offering-of-7nm-finfet-technology
twitter.com/AnonBabble

All yours for the low, low price of $1200 :^)

>15% from skylake to kabylake
My sides have reached Alpha Centauri

>implying Moore's law has anything to do with processing/benchmark speeds
>thinking 15 % is anywhere close to Moore's law even if it were

>15% better performance on sysmark
...and 1% in real world applications.

>Fine print litteraly admits the benchmarking software is biased towards Intel

Meanwhile AMD releases processors that have slower single thread speed and more cores.

I don't think a 15% increase is worth the probability the price will be $700+ compared to today's 7th gen CPUs, which will probably get a price decrease when Gen 8 comes out.

Nobody said anything about AMD.

It's only comparing Intel, moron.

>15%2

2=op is faggot

>tfw 2600k is almost has good than the new shit in real world applications

I thought 8th Gen was planned for October?

>Almost as good
>35% slower in games
What did he mean by this?

>tfw projecting so hard you could work in a movie theatre

>35% slower in games

[citation needed]

I got a 14nm x5-z8300. Good enough.

...

>Forecasts are Intel estimates, based upon current expectations and available information and are subject to change without notice.

>whoops, seems like our expectations were a bit too high and we had to correct the numbers down, truly sorry about that
>thanks for all the preorders though lol

WAIT EVEN THE NEXT GENERATION SI GOING TO BE ON 14NM????

Jesus Christ intel really fucked up. Both TSMC and Samsung will be selling 10nm SoC by the end of the third quarter.

Doesn't sysmark test the GPU?

Anyhow, 15% from Skylake to Kabylake just proves what a worthless sack of shit the benchmark is since you can end up with higher temps and power consumption with Kabylake if you get a bad silicon batch.

It's true. AMD fell for the more cores meme. Mediatek also fell for this meme.

Fascinating, that's why Intel has a 10 core consumer chip out for almost a year and released a 24 core chip a day ago.

Call me when these make sense in a consumer build.

>7th gen core i7 15% better than 6th gen

This is an outright lie.

They do, just not enough sense for someone who only shitposts on 4ching and plays console ports.

GPU IS 15% BETTER THEY DIDN'T LIE

"Consumer"

Intel's HEDT line is consumer no matter how poor you are.

>10 core consumer chip

Yeah? Please enlighten me as to what exactly the i7-6950X offers to a consumer compared to a 6700k/7700k. I'll wait.

About 2.3 times the throughput and double the bandwidth and I/O

6 more cores. Duh. Don't be stupid

>buzzowords

>technical specifications are buzzwords

You're out of your containment board.

Dumb Sup Forumsermin.

And what difference does that make - for the consumer - in real world applications?
Because spending $1400 extra to rape some synthetic benchmarks isn't typical consumer behavior no matter how you stretch it, difference in most of the applications will be negligible, and it will underperform the 7700k in the vast majority games, and that is just about the end of what normies care about.

You think consumers are just normalfags who browse facebook? Consumers are also graphic designers, private webservers and mail servers, scientists & other number crunchers, web crawlers, parsers, etc etc
Which pretty much all need all the cores and bandwidth and memory they can get.

Not to mention of course video editing. With the prevalence of cheap 4K cameras, drones with HD cameras, GoPros, even emerging 8K cameras, that footage requires a lot of processing, and more cores will always do it faster.

DED
>DED
DED

forbes.com/sites/antonyleather/2017/02/09/amd-ryzen-prices-revealed-massive-blow-to-intel/#c8d05236e7c2

Basically any serious work benefits from more cores while game engines are still stuck in 2007.

>while game engines are still stuck in 2007.
Some devs have actually competent coders.

Do they even know what Moore's law is about?
Goddamnit Intel

That's the exception, not the rule.

Of course they don't, it's not like Moore himself is a honorary chief at Intel or something.

Durfhurf

Why is her ass so flat?

Why is your p0n0s so small?

>anandtech.com/show/11112/intel-to-equip-fab-42-for-7-nm
Does GloFo have a 7nm process already?

Yes, they had it since they bough IBM foundry business.

*$1700 muh goyim

www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/47301.wss
globalfoundries.com/newsroom/press-releases/2016/09/14/globalfoundries-extends-roadmap-to-deliver-industry-s-leading-performance-offering-of-7nm-finfet-technology

They start bringing the node online later this year.

>15% increase from 6th gen to 7th gen
How Indian do you have to be deny reality?

this. doesn't matter how much string you pull up her ass. that ass is flat.
THANK YOU BASED INTEL FOR CHARGING ME ANOTHER ME MY FIRST BORN FOR 1% PERFORMANCE GAIN.

No one's even sure if this is Coffee Lake either. That was a planned 14nm desktop line with Cannonlake being a simultaneous 10nm mobile line.

So there might be one more 14nm desktop line after this.

Its not Coffee Lake yet, thats 2018. The upcoming 14nm line they're referring to is Kaby Lake-X on socket 2066.

Nah that's confirmed to have gen 7 branding.

A 6 core Coffee Lake chip would score higher than a paltry 15% in the synthetic Sysmark. AMD used Sysmark and PCMark8 to show major double digit performance increases with minor clock bumps with their APUs like Trinity and Richland. So that 15% uplift there is pretty telling, it looks like nothing but a clock bump, or a clock bump and faster memory.

wtf i hate intel now

Intel has always had the benchmarks in their pocket. This is an old strategy of theirs.

Forbes referencing wccftech? Fucking kek

pretty sure its the i7 7740K kaby lake-x, they fixed the problem with the TIM and now takes advantage you get from deliding the an extra -30c and has a higher clock speed ... in other words WHAT IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THEE FIRST PLACE not some garbage 1% over skylake

>Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors.

>It's the same """"""15%"""""" as with Sky- vs. Kaby Lake

Dropped