Sweden, explain yourself
>WE
Sweden, explain yourself
I'm actually hyped for this, and I haven't felt this way for a FPS since MW2
>being hyped for anything made by DICE after the failed abortions that were BF4, Hardline and Battlefront on top of the fact they're shoehorning in niggers for WW1 and strong independent cavalrywomen
bf4 is pretty good once they fixed the netcode. it's a more fleshed out bf3 and it feels like what bf3 was supposed to be.
>Hardline
>made by dice
White american regiments didn't really exist in ww1?
Same here, 4 is one of the best ones i;ve played
can't wait for the new one, just kind of wish they had russians in it as well, would'e loved to shoot some nuggets
>Sweden
It's self explanatory desu.
>colonial powers weren't sending their colonial lemmings into the trenches as cannon-fodder
god does Sup Forums get fucking stupid when black people are mentioned.
What's wrong with it?
...
don't be a memer. nonwhites in ww2 were maybe like 0.05% of the soldiers fighting. to go out of their way to placate such an absurdly tiny minority of the tens of millions of european fighters is purely political.
Daily reminder, people who talk shit about BF4 do not play battlefield games.
Cus if they did they'd know that after all the fixes, BF4 is the best BF game.
>colonial powers send their colonial lemmings over
>consists of canadians and anzacs
>oh yeah what ethnicity are they?
because the vast majority of combatants and causalities were Europeans, it's insulting to disregard them and shoehorn a nigger on the cover to pander to a single regiment of the shortest serving and lowest casualty belligerent
>>colonial powers send their colonial lemmings over
>>consists of canadians and anzacs
>>oh yeah what ethnicity are they?
>ignoring African possesions
>ignoring the colonies of nations other than Britian
you should know, Britain was thrashed in Angola, iirc
and special forces are even smaller, but we feature them all the time. Its what video games and the like are meant for, they can tell stories.
>britain was thrashed in a portuguese colony who weren't in the war
no history books in tel aviv?
im sorry, i messed up on the specifics, but you're still wrong
en.wikipedia.org
and more importantly, en.wikipedia.org
>wow look at these few battles fought in africa
>let's ignore the millions upon millions of dead fought in battles between europeans in europe
schlomo PLEASE
why can't a black person exist in a war where blacks fought?
there's going to be multiple protagonists to the game, so you don't need to think its trying to rewrite history. all they're showing a story, not setting a precedent.
go ahead, keep calling this southern racist a jew, it's showing the lack of argument you have.
It's just the cover. The game isn't actually going to be all about niggers
Can we please stop fucking talking about this
>uhhhh, but look at this one regiment of only blacks..!!
straw that broke the camels back etc
artillery... fire!
if he is part of a real historical event, they can show it if they want. this isn't a ww1 documentary claiming that it was a totally black war or anything, it's just a story told via a FPS, and it's probably going to be a shitty one.
well for me it's not about it being historically inaccurate, which it by the way isn't
en.wikipedia.org
for me it's about being tired of the practice of shoehorning non-whites every_fucking_where
>BF4 is the best BF game
My first BF game was BC2 or 3: the post
battlefield is shit but I was really wainting for ww1 game. But the nigger is too much I agree
AYO HOL UP
>It's a Sup Forums bait thread
>caring about what's on the cover to an FPS
Son, chances are the nignog isn't even going to be in the campaign, and if he was, Battlefields campaign has been notoriously shit since BC. It makes no difference at all.
Because there is absolutely no reason other than to push some ridiculous agenda.
reminder that america won every single battle it engaged in during WW1
All western video games push a ridiculous agenda.
>Daily reminder, people who talk shit about BF4 do not play battlefield games.
>Cus if they did they'd know that after all the fixes, BF4 is the best BF game.
I waited a fucking year (Y E A R) and they still hadn't fixed a major sound glitch for my computer that made the game unplayable. FUCK DICE. I don't care if it's the best game in the world now, that's a trash product.
Just buy it on consoles lol
Nigga, you get to play as one of the Harlem Hellfighters, they were fucking bad ass and composed a significant portion of the AEF stop losing your shit over being 'cukt'.
...
vietnam
Majority of non-white combatants were Indians on the British side
What all three of them?
>finally a game about WW1
>made by Scandishit cucks
Fuck this world.
You guys know what would be funny
if they end up making an Eastern European Front, and there are blacks thrown in with the germs or russians or serbs lol, that would be pretty funny
>The AEF deploys with two African-American staffed and manned combat divisions.
>Of which, the 93rd, was deployed on the front for six months, longer than any other American combat unit.
>Fought so tenaciously that the Germans called them blood thirsty black men.
>Never surrendered nor lost had a man captured by the enemy.
>In comparison to the Dutch, who only committed 7 divisions to the war.
B-Bbuut-MUH PROPOGANDA
Do you guys realise that in best ww2 shooter we play for girl from French resistance?
>All western video games push a ridiculous agenda.
you're a fucking retard
No you're getting KEKED don't you see? They're rewriting our digital heritage!!!
If you disagree then KEK KEK SWEDEN YES!!
t. Sup Forums
Because african americans(which made up the massive majority of all blacks in WW1) did almost zero combat if you'd read a history book
they were mostly delegated to meaningless tasks. It's basically history rewriting at this point.
So the reality is that they made up probably muh 369th infantry regiment
it's blatant pandering and if you deny this you're purposely being dumb
don't know about from other countries
USA absolutely raped every single battle because they were all fresh to the fight. It wasn't even fair if you read the details, the germs just had zero chance to repel an entire fresh military.
all the experience in the world doesn't do shit for you when your morale is zero from years of war, and what, ~8 million dead krauts when america joined?
>~8 million dead
dead+wounded
BIG
BLACK
DOG
SNIFFING
MY
TIGHT
FINNISH
RECTUM
FEELS
LIKE
NO
BLACK
Cuckposters are too young to know that game
ASS
MAN
t. FRONCE
FUCKING FRANCE
God FUCKING damnit you stupid slimy droopy eyed big lipped frog piece of shit
...
we had a good run lads
Pâques ?
I don't follow much on videogames, wouldn't a WW1 game be sit in a trench and wait to be sent over to die simulator ? With mustard gas.
nah it's a vidya and you will be cover, shoot and recover from church to church
It's battlefield, so it will just be a run and gun click and shoot with a WWI aesthetic painted over it.
A shitty aesthetic looking at that cover desu
do you think the game will retain any semblance of trench warfare whatsoever?
I like the whole desert warfare thing in Afirca in the middleeast, that's actually pretty cool. But why put a black person on the main cover? He clearly isn't going to be the main character, if he was that would be fine. I'd like the play as an Armenian rebel against the Ottoman empire and watch my family get genocided, or a japanese war ship against a german one, or have a sympathetic view of the germans since they really weren't the "bad guys", nor was anyone except really (debateable) the ottoman empire. That's the only exception. Instead I feel like they're going to push the "le black people did everything and whitey stole it" meme or just use race to sell more copies. That's the only explanation I can think of.
Well in the trailer, someone noticed that one of the soldiers bears a patch resembling the 2nd Australian Tunnelling company who're responsible for building heaps of tunnels and trenches as well as engineering, I think this holds a bit of importance as no one just randomly adds Australians to a WW game as we're irrelevant as fuck and 99% of the time just bunched in with "British" forces.
I don't mind the negro on the cover, the game is gonna be published by fucking EA, there's no chance for it to be good anyway and I don't see why anyone would be triggered by another abortion of a game from the worst publisher in all of vidya.
>But why put a black person on the main cover?
Because he's the main character of the Hellfighter DLC that's why.
The Harlem Hellfighters saw the most combat out of any US unit you moron
Stop getting your history from stormfront
Absolutely fucking hilarious that you nerds are so god damn pathetic that you care about there being A BLACK GUY IN MUH TOYS
Like holy fuck I feel embarrassed and dirty to even be posting in the same thread as you Friday night magic regulars, take baths
And it's a character from a dlc, not the core game
>Because african americans(which made up the massive majority of all blacks in WW1)
>mfw no trigger warning to protect me from having to see dark skin in popular media
Help! Help! I'm being genocided! The jews are pushing a devious agenda to brainwash whites into not being overtly hostile to blacks! Truly it is I who is the victim of racism, here!
So, all this thread to one nigger? Holy fuck, and I thought minorities were the triggered ones. I can asure that you're not any better than a welfare begging nigger if you think that a black dude being portrayed in mainstream media is ethnic genocide orchestrated by the Jews.
The cringiest part is the black guy, like every other protagonist, is in the game for only one mission and you're going to be playing white people almost exclusively in the MP, yet these guys are acting like the entire game is going to gloss over Europe.
Nobody likes quotas and agenda shoved in your face.
if they wanted to be edgy they'd have used someone from the british raj since whens the last time you saw a curry on a cover of a game
>WAAAHHHH BLACK PEOPLE IN MY VIDEO GAMES WAHHH
It's literally one black guy you fucking nerd, seeing a black person isn't a quota or agenda it's literally just a black person
Get necked immediately
You realize the agenda is to tap into the US market, right? The American demographic, on average, doesn't give a shit about WW1. Like everyone in this thread says, we didn't really do shit in WW1. EA knows the European market will have much stronger feelings about a WW1 and buy the game anyway. The game and content has just been announced so for all we know, the Hellfighters design and merch is just for the US market and the UK and German markets might give similar merch packs and alternate cover designs to go along with the Lawrence of Arabia and Red Baron DLC content that is also being released with the Hellfighters.
That's the agenda, user.
Yeah those last 8 months of ww1 were real tough
australia and new zealand should just be one nation like the UK with separate countries
>Battlefield 1
>1
Because it's [spoiler]the First World War[/spoiler]
>it's a people get hyped for a DICE game then everyone stops playing after 2 weeks episode
yeah i could see people getting up in arms if they pushed the we wuz kangs n shieet meme but it's just the cover
So black people are allowed to get mad about proportional representation but whites are not?
How is one character out of many being black pose a major proportional representation issue
He is a part of one mission out of many
there were colonial troops on the western front
Absolutely retarded to have a defined character on the cover page as a mascot. Could wear a gas mask or an armored helmet and avoid all the bullshit together. No, you have to put a nigger there.
It's literally one black character on the cover of one game, white people are represented LITERALLY EVERYWHERE
How do you even use a computer when you're this stupid
But gas mask is ebul german thing, can't have strong, independent mc wearing that stuff.
EA directs Dice. 100% of the nigger gamers are in your country.
Also 100% of the Xbox players. Europe is PC and PS only.