FUG :DDDDD

FUG :DDDDD

Other urls found in this thread:

overclockers.co.uk/pc-components/processors/amd/amd-socket-am4?stockids=CP-39V-AM,CP-39W-AM,CP-39X-AM
webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.asus.com/gr/Motherboards/PRIME-X370-PRO/specifications/
shahrsakhtafzar.com/fa/images/95/11/khb/bbopbbyuoojjH/aaaa.PNG
overclockers.co.uk/asus-prime-x370-pro-amd-x370-socket-am4-ddr4-atx-motherboard-mb-69f-as.html
overclockers.co.uk/asus-prime-b350-plus-amd-b350-socket-am4-ddr4-atx-motherboard-mb-69g-as.html
pcpartpicker.com/list/GLVQM8
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7600K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-6600K/3885vs3503
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>320 gbp
Oy vey. It should be 280.

>AMD Ryzen 7 1800X 3.6GHz Base 4GHz Boost £488.99
>AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 3.4GHz Base 3.8GHz Boost £389.99
>AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0 GHz Base 3.7GHz Boost £319.99
overclockers.co.uk/pc-components/processors/amd/amd-socket-am4?stockids=CP-39V-AM,CP-39W-AM,CP-39X-AM
Oh boy, Brexit happened

So 320 in local currency? Stop crying.

Leave remain shill faggot.

...

To put it in context:
>i7 7700
£295
>Ryzen 1700
£320
>i7 7700k
£325

Has there been anything about how the 1700 compares to the 1800x? I'm assuming that the difference between 'x' and non 'x' is this intelligent overclocking thing.

Praying for single core performance. Any reliable non-synthetic benchmarks yet?

>I'm assuming that the difference between 'x' and non 'x' is this intelligent overclocking thing.
actually not. they both support XFR.

the X is apparently just means it's more powerful.

Oh! Where did you read this? Not doubting, just want to see for myself.

When you mean it is 'more powerful', is this something aside from clock speeds - something locked in lower spec chips?

From what I've heard/read so far the X versions seem to have a 95W TDP whereas the regular 1700 has a 65W TDP.

> 3Ghz
> 99 cores
Enjoy your useless CPU other than for encoding, *AGAIN*.

Ooooh, I knew that the 1800X has 95w TDP but this is also the same as the 1700X? Am I right in effectively thinking that the higher TDP is only beneficial for overclocking/auto-boost?

Sold my 4690k system after throwing it in an old case with an unused GTX 970 for $900 yesterday after a guy from work got his tax returns.

The wait begins.

Probably. Some binning may also be involved.

I believe the only difference is in binning.
1700 being the lowest binned 8 core/16t
1700x being able to clock a little higher at base
1800x being able to clock higher again'

But encoding is all I do

expensive

wonder how much the 6 core version will be

yeah, 1700x and 1800x are both self-overclocking with 95W TDPs, the latter obviously being just better binnings.

the standard Wraith coolers have supposedly ~140W limits, so both chips should clock better than their 3.4/3.6 GHz nominal ratings.

>still cheaper than the i7-5960X it competes with

So with this in mind, I'm curious - what would realistically be the difference between a 1700 and 1800x at the same clocks?

Or at least the 1700x and 1800x?

You may not be able to answer, but someone else may? I'm curious...

Yeah, and I'm not complaining about it either. Just putting the comparison out there... If the single-core performance is remotely respectable then I am jumping right on it. Will be great for virtualisation, I'm sure.

>ECC ON X370
MY DONG HAS BEEN KONG'D

Source?

My dong is ready

There shouldn't be a difference between the 1700 and 1800X when running at the same clock speeds.
The 1800X might be able to hit higher clocks though.

...

With them being, so far as we know, the same chip, just binned differently, then nothing. Maybe the 1800x will draw a little less power, run at lower voltages at those clocks, but otherwise the difference is in how high the chips can go.

>1800X for 560 eurobucks
Not bad, not bad at all.

The on-paper difference is negligible. How far are 1700X and 1800X expected to overclock?

I'd expect they both overlock some distance, and the 1800x has significantly more headroom given the price difference?

webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.asus.com/gr/Motherboards/PRIME-X370-PRO/specifications/

shahrsakhtafzar.com/fa/images/95/11/khb/bbopbbyuoojjH/aaaa.PNG

overclockers.co.uk/asus-prime-x370-pro-amd-x370-socket-am4-ddr4-atx-motherboard-mb-69f-as.html

Looking into it a little bit more myself still

...

We don't know yet. There's a screenshot floating around of an 1800X at 5.2GHz on a CPU-Z install that reports fucked voltages (it reads 1.8v or some shit) but that's about it.

IT'S NOT FAIR

Where are the fucking itx boards

Mate can you stop posting like a loony Black Country chav? You're embarrassing me.

>yfw you realize AMD can just go up to 125W if they feel threatened.

thats a fucking beast for that price.

My dong!

Any boards that supports more than 64GB ram?

>We don't know yet. There's a screenshot floating around of an 1800X at 5.2GHz on a CPU-Z install that reports fucked voltages (it reads 1.8v or some shit) but that's about it.

That's likely liquid nitrogen dick measuring

B350 supports it as well

overclockers.co.uk/asus-prime-b350-plus-amd-b350-socket-am4-ddr4-atx-motherboard-mb-69g-as.html

>AMD Ryzen™ Processors 4 x DIMM, max. 64GB, DDR4 2666/2400/2133 MHz, ECC and non-ECC, un-buffered memory

So is 2666 confirmed as the official supported ram speed?

What's that in Euros?

Well that's 390 dollars

Look on top, there's prices there. You retard.

The 1800X is the $500 part, no?

Somewhat interested to see if there will be any mini-ITX server boards based on Zen. Something like the asrock rack e3c226d2i and c2550d4i boards.

Certain features like ECC memory support could enable that.

>in euros

how can one be so retarded ?

It's probably in swedish dinars

>Mate
>Not a chav
cлyшaeтe влин, чтo вы гoвopитe

Fuck I meant 380 dollars for the 1700 at 360 euros
560 euros -> 591 dollars

397€ for 1700, 605€ for 1800X

How does that compare to other EU countries?

Yeah, considering US prices are always without tax and EU prices always include like 20% VAT that's pretty good.

Jesus Christ, I hand't even thought about that. They have a huge margin, Intel is already at 135 on their top of the line, they're fucked.

10 to 20 euros more than in France currently

ayyy

AMD has whipped out the Expand Dong card this year. Oh hell.

Is this Canada?

current prices in France

>cheap as fugg

Aussi bucks?

I want to know what the Scandi bucks converts to in Euros you morons

I don't know what brand of ice nigger he is though

>tfw the Intel chips will be even cheaper when Intel panic price drops everything

Dutch prices are in

Yep Australia

wait, when are the 6 core ones out?

Anybody knows when they will release the 1600X?

And Azerty has them for cheaper.

Bongers are in

Anyone else hype as fuck for Hexa and Quad cores?

Consumerfag here. What can I do with 8 cores apart from DOTA 2 streaming and unzipping Skyrim mods faster?

>buying launch
nah
Im happy with my build
pcpartpicker.com/list/GLVQM8

>7600K

Brag.

Compiling and emulation? Video editing? Altcoins mining? Virtual machines, large capacity NAS, large web servers, mass seedbox, Plex streaming? I could go all day with this.

Plan is simple, get 1700 non-X and overclock the shit out of it.

Not have your games lag to shit when you have Skype/Teamspeak and a bunch of browser tabs open.

Also

>pcpartpicker.com/list/GLVQM8

WrongProc.jpg

I'll be using mine for VMs

Any kind of content creation

wouldn't the X one overclock better.

>tfw 6800k is 400 quid before price reduction

Don't know if I'm willing to pay over 400 for the 1800x

>plex streaming
lol what, you can stream all of a hard drives bandwidth with ancient cpu's unless you mean conversion streaming which is shit anyway.

7600k is literally the best CPU for gaming.
Debate me.
I fucking dare you.

but can they deal with hype and actually ship all that stuff?

>literally a 6600K renamed 7600K

Well, as a britbong, I'm happy with my 6700k. Wasn't planning on switching anyways, but was just taking a look at their offerings.

overclocking is for end of life of the chips. to be able to squeeze a few more years out of them. dont base your purchase on oc ability.

Presumably yes, if they are better bins. But would it worth to pay more for extra 2-300MHz?

Then grab a 1700, anything you do that'll make use of the 6800k will love the extra 2 cores/4 threads of the 1700.
Get a decent cooler, lock that fucker in at 3.6, and sit pretty.

these arent fucking nintendos man.

Maybe. We don't know yet.

Good thing the 1800X competes with the 6900K performance-wise and only costs slightly more than the 6800K. This is some insane value.

Yea 70 dollars for extra few MHz isn't worth it to me

Considering the dumbass move they're pulling with Optane memory - don't count on it.

Intel is restricting Optane to the newest chips (which no one is buying) while their partner in the whole Xpoint thing (Micron) is planning on selling drives compatible with pretty much anything.

yeah no
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7600K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-6600K/3885vs3503

You'd think that.. but unfortunately past events have said otherwise.

165w on their enterprise line.

>MUH 8% GAINS
Really. 8% is a margin of error, not a performance gain.

>I CAN GET 2 MORE FPS IN GAME

manchild gayman

well I'm waiting for game benchmarks I want to build something with a gtx1060 or 1070

>damage controlling this hard

AMD has sold out of chips before?

>%3 arbitrary numbers more

gj

How is Intel going to respond to this?

By enabling hyperthreading on i5's and Bentiuns
So they've just gone and invalidated half of their product line with that move.

congratulations, you are the fanboy of the year!