AMDead advertise Ryzen as a gaming cpu

>AMDead advertise Ryzen as a gaming cpu
>turns out it shit as gaming
>fanboys say it wasn't designed for gayming

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=AM5XI1plQpU
youtu.be/8-mMBbWHrwM?t=10m35s
techreport.com/review/31546/where-minimum-fps-figures-mislead-frame-time-analysis-shines
3dcenter.org/dateien/abbildungen/Intel-Questions-about-Ryzen.preview.png
hothardware.com/news/intel-reacting-to-amd-ryzen-apparently-cutting-prices-on-core-i7
overclockers.co.uk/amd-ryzen-7-eight-core-1700-3.70ghz-socket-am4-processor-retail-cp-39x-am.html
phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd-ryzen-gaming&num=1
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

>it gets 10 -15 fps less
>its shit

Back to Sup Forums

>AMD fags believe 10-15fps lower is nothing when the processor is more expensive
>amd fags think it's only 10-15fps
Kek

go away shill

>can't even into 30fps on an ancient engine at 1080P

I knew Ryzen was a fucking disappointment, but I had no idea how much

(you)

Are you really so pathetic that you had to pic of an old RADV (very new Vulkan open source driver for AMDGPU) benchmark from phoronix to justify your pathetic existence?
Recent benchmarks proved there was something wrong with the drivers and the situation improved.

If you want to use these kinds of benchmarks wait for Michael to test Ryzen + Nvidia on Linux... then try to shill.

>>AMDead advertise Ryzen as a gaming cpu


wrong

>advertise Ryzen as a gaming cpu
[citation needed]

...

Jesus Christ Pootel is garbage

>the cycle of amdrone

Go away illiterate shill

>intel poopies for rupees poojeet cant read
lol

>intel cuck shill
go away poojeet pootel shill

...

youtube.com/watch?v=AM5XI1plQpU

this dude sums it up pretty well

AMD has really fucked me this time. Sitting here with an 1800X and no fucking motherboards in stock anywhere. Turns our their 8 core is really more like two 4 cores stuck together and windows doesn't handle it correctly. It's worse for gaming, doesn't overclock for shit, but it's still priced right. The 1700X for 350 in particular seems like a great deal for the performance you get. All the reviewers make note that gaming feels 'smoother' on the R7 compared to 7700K, even if the max frames aren't as high. As long as I can get a mobo soon I'll be happy, although I expect skylake E to rape this shit.

>fanboys are retards who don't dwell in reality and constantly move the goalposts when things don't pan out in their deluded favor
wow who fucking knew
more news at 11

How do you know these things if all you have is a processor and no motherboard?

The many reviews

>The 1700X for 350 in particular seems like a great deal for the performance you get

the only ryzen cpu even worth buying is the 1700 non x.

Don't you niggers get tired? Fuck off with this shit already. Ryzen is great competition for Intel's Broadwell-E and single CCX puts the CPU on the expected numbers, there just needs to be better implementation. It's a new platform, you faggots can't seem to remember anything from both camps or are too new to understand anything.

>The 1700X for 350 in particular seems like a great deal for the performance you get

(You), of course, meant the 1700 for $299.99 USD delivered.

Didn't know the 1700 was down to 300, that would be best then. Although those can typically only hit 3.9 on all cores, where the 1700X is binned a little better and can often do 4.

I don't buy into that bullshit like "feels smoother". Yeah just vinyl sounds "richer" or "the delicate notes and tones of a bottle of wine".

It's a good proc, no doubt but leave the feels at the door and give me numbers and datums.

Ryzen 5 & 3 is a gaming cpu

its not its 329 on amazon, newegg,

>I don't buy into that bullshit like "feels smoother".
I wouldn't if it was one review saying it, but there are lot of people mentioning this. Especially smaller video reviewers.

heck even wendel said it, and he doesn't play games at all to know the nuance
meaning effect is that big
it's actually same way with 6900K, but nobody talked about it because it was out of reach

youtu.be/8-mMBbWHrwM?t=10m35s

fuck even jayztoshillsinone praised it

Nice to see my 5820k performing well.

>I don't buy into that bullshit
Then don't.

>give me numbers and datums

techreport.com/review/31546/where-minimum-fps-figures-mislead-frame-time-analysis-shines

thank you for the daily ryzen post i almost forgot there is this kind of CPU see you tomorrow

...

1080p is old tech noobs.samsung CPUs are the future silicon is dieing Graphene is the future

Not a single good game on that pic.
Where are the MMOs, CS:GO, DOTA2, Siege, Titanfall, BF1, ARMA3, anything that people even play?

because all those games run on toasters, except maybe bf and arma
and people play arma and titanfall? are you kidding?

That is literally a rigged benchmark, eteknix is the only people who get those results

Here is reality and verified by hundreds of other reviews

Ryzen is good competition for Intel's expensive niche CPUs that nobody ever bought in the first place

In the mainstream, Ryzen is a complete failure.

good morning to you too, do you start your day with posting this outdated benchmark?

>outdated benchmark

LOL AMD shills are so retarded, this benchmark has results that are replicated across hundreds of different review sites, here's another

>are replicated across hundreds of different review sites
but you post only three, day after day

Intel pays for regularity, not for originality

LOL 3? There's fucking hundreds you moron, have another.

t. AMD shill

I was going to buy kaby lake for my next build but this annoying fanboy convinced me to get a ryzen 7700 so thanks.

You type like a fag and your shits all retarded.

>ryzen 7700

Lmao

You are literally retarded

AMD shills are so braindead

>ryzen 7700

Get me through this time machine where you got your 7th gen Ryzen

I meant 1700 but thanks for correcting my typo.

*adds to cart*

:^)

>tfw Intel can't actually answer Ryzen
>tfw Intel stock is going to start falling until they create a solution that competes with Ryzen using the same number of cores at an affordable price
>tfw AMD stock is going to go up, and unless Intel does what I just said, they're actually finished.

If I had stock in Intel I would be selling the fuck out of it and buying AMD right about now.

Are you that idiot that trolls in every AMD thread on Reddit? You're pathetic, consider killing yourself

LOL AMD reddit shill detected

Jesus christ you people are awful, I don't even post on reddit, but the AMD shills on reddit are the worst kind of people

Do the world a favor and kill yourself.

nice reddit spacing. kys yourself you dumb 15 year old virgin

Intel didn't even lower their prices a cent

They have nothing to worry about with Ryzen, it's fucking awful, the worst CPU launch I have ever seen

The $500 Ryzen gets beat by a $340 Intel, it's pathetic

>AMD consistently benchmark it against a workstation chip in workstation workloads.
>Briefly mention games
>Intel shills pretend it was heavily advertised for gaming so they have something to bitch about
>Bitching commences

I have enough of waiting.

Zen has too many problems at the moment, it will take several months to sort them out, and if it's design problems, it will take the next generation to adress those problems.

Gonna go with the 7700 Boxed non-K version.
I don't need to go higher, actually I am gonna undervolt the fuck out of it to make it more efficient.

This is because it's a new platform. Intel has approached the limits of 14nm 4/8 thread approach. Which is why you're seeing pitiful performance increases with each of the new releases.

AMD is using 8 core/16 thread approach, which is going to become the norm very soon. The performance gains will soon surpass Intel when new revisions come out, especially if Intel stays with 4 core / 8 thread approach.

I don't know about where you live, but here in Europe they've slashed i7 prices. They also put out that really embarrassing article about Ryzen like "Please don't consider them you guys, we're still the best! We promise!"

>get 10-15fps less, sometimes within a 5% margin of error, sometimes higher
>this is made irrelevant since it saturated a typical monitor's refresh rate twice over anyway
>50% more cores i.e. future proof
>uncucked and cheaper motherboards for future upgrades
>cooler included
>overclockable, machine learning type improvements on certain tasks
be a good goy and buy intel

lol enjoy regretting it in 4 years when quad cores are shit

>non-K version
its worse than 1700 non-X version even with all it's problems

K is good because it got clocks, non K is not worth even i5K price

Intel is straight up panicking, Ryzen completely caught them off guard and is set to disrupt several markets in the next two quarters. It already basically rendered their enthusiast level CPUs obsolete.

link? this is hilarious

>mfw pc broke down
>mfw the 1700 has been sold out for 2 weeks in Yurope

what the fuck AMD?

LOL Intel literally hasn't dropped prices a cent.

They don't give a shit about Ryzen because Ryzen is so awful.

>paying twice as much for a Ryzen CPU that performs worse

AMDfags must truly hate themselves

I urge anyone thinking about getting a Ryzen to get one...just to spite the Intel shills.

3dcenter.org/dateien/abbildungen/Intel-Questions-about-Ryzen.preview.png
It might actually be fake now that I've looked into it in more detail, I can't find the actual web page so it's been removed or it never existed to begin with.

hothardware.com/news/intel-reacting-to-amd-ryzen-apparently-cutting-prices-on-core-i7
I've observed the same thing on amazon.co.uk myself.

overclockers.co.uk/amd-ryzen-7-eight-core-1700-3.70ghz-socket-am4-processor-retail-cp-39x-am.html
Overclockers has some.

I urge anyone thinking about getting an Intel to get one...just to spite the AMD shills.

>buy Ryzen to spite Intel
>its sold out everywhere

Of course it's fake

AMD shills make up articles all the time about bullshit and try to pass it off as real.

Intel literally did not lower their prices a cent.

>I can't read, the post

Go ahead, check new egg, check Amazon

Intel CPUs are all still the same price

Damn i just came back from the UK last week, i should've bought a 1700 there.

Still no info on the next batch of CPU's / Boards in Germoney

Ryzen for budget 4k.

>budget

Are you retarded? The $500 Ryzen CPU is getting beat by a $340 Intel CPU

>amd: look, our ryzen beats intel on blender
>retards: imma a gaymen faggot
>amd: well... it also does really well with video encoding in handbreak, so if you are a "content creator"...
>retards: *autistic screeching* MUH GAYMS!!!
>amd: ryzen beats the 6800k and 6900k at pretty much half the cost, and you don't really use those for gaming
>retards: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
amd: ryzen still does pretty well with multi threaded games, maybe ryzen 5 or 3 could be better suited for you
>retards: fuck you, i'm buying intel

>17.65 fps is playable

I should rephrase, Ryzen for playable 4k on a budget.

Maybe you're right, I can't find the Discord message in which I told my friend about the price drops, maybe I dreamt it.

Yup

Sadly AMD shills love to write fake articles like that to trick everyone

1700x was a mistake

they should've sold 1700x as 1700 and cut current 1700 into ryzen 3s

this isnt real like..... right?

not even a shill, i wanted to buy Rypoo even though it's worst at games, but I only freaking play Total War, Dota 2, and Vanilla WoW. Rypoo blows chunks on all of those games.

oh fugggggggggggggggg

>The $500 Ryzen CPU is getting beat by a $340 Intel CPU
And my Intel Dual Core CPU beats their i7 line in Dwarf Fortress because Dwarf Fortress doesn't give a shit about core number but 1 core's clock rate and RAM frequency.

Meanwhile most games care about drivers and how their Developers coded their games to work for certain hardware, more than core performance, which is where Intel beats AMD or rather where Developers fail to meet coding expectations.

It's real

Ryzen is absolutely horrid at games

it's AMD gpu problem with vulcan driver on linux
essentialy edge case nobody cares about

Dota 2 is running on Source 2 (in this case with the Vulkan renderer, which is even newer).

It's real but it's not significant. They're results using an experimental render engine in one game on Linux, here's the actual article with all of the benchmarks, not just the worst of the lot.
phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd-ryzen-gaming&num=1

>ONLY MY USE CASE IS RELEVANT, ANY OTHER USE CASE LITERALLY DOES NOT EXIST!!!

Dailty reminder that this 'ironic' Dunning–Kruger fag who laughs at 'normies' will then go and non-ironically buy Intel.

damn son, my last post was shilling for intel. now though, you are retarded sir.

you prefer having 74 highs, and 17.85 lows? what in the fuck? vs 65/30? Do you even know how to read graphs?

wait, they were using the shitty open-source drivers on like, ubuntu 16?

im tech illiterate but those new open source drivers that replaced flgrx are total SHIT. AMD->Linux drivers in general are total SHIT.

why even run such a retarded benchmark? fuck, at least go back to 14.04, where you can install Catalyst Center rather than transforming your 1080ti into an APU-power chip.

Would much rather have an Intel CPU that performs better and costs $160 less, it's a no brainer.

>perform better
>fuckhuge gap between highs and lows
>some how this "performs better"
retarded shill

>performs better
>nearly 20 fps worse on the minimum, between going from a tolerable 35 to nearly fucking 15
wew

AMD shill thinks worse performance is better, what a surprise

...

What, are you poor? lmao

>buying a slower CPU that costs more
>AMDfags think this is a good thing

Jesus christ you people are truly brain damaged

Oh, so you're actually poor. Sucks to be you, user.