Janitor deleted Anglo thread for some reason, even though it was as Sup Forums-related as it can be. Let's continue.
Pic related is Soviet MiG-15, best machine of the Korean war. Americans were dying like flies to it. Americans were fucking frightened by it, so much that they gave $100 000 reward to a pilot that deserted with it.
The MiG-15 was powered by a modified Rolls-Royce Nene turbojet engine, sold by the British to the fucking Soviet Union for money. LITERALLY greedy, beady-eyed Anglo scum, helping communist monkeys which cost hundreds of lives, and the legacy of these silver coins continues to this day with North Korea.
Bump for quality anti-British thread you can exchange shallow insults now
John Ward
We sold them out jet tech since we needed to pay of debts to amarica for getting into a war to save you I know this is bate but still you can do better Poland
Colton Gray
>for getting into a war to save you And did you? Last time Brits fought with III Reich without the help of Amerifriends, London was bombed with V1s.
Jace Williams
>to save you
yet you did fuck all
Joshua Hill
Nene served as a base for pretty much every first generation jet engine on the old continent.
What's your point
Ian Jenkins
Yeah, you missed the part where the Brits sold the technology to the Soviets which started a chain of events that led to North Korea today.
Henry Cox
It's a Poland hates England edition
Is it because your best and brightest schoolfriends all live here now and are successful while you're still shitposting from your depressing commieblock ghetto?
Robert Bennett
>Le Anglo maymay Get over it Thomasz, no one cares about your pathetic little buffer state.
Long live the USSR lol...
Samuel Jenkins
Nah, it's because janny deleted a good, Sup Forums-related thread. And I like this beady-eyed Anglo meme. There are too few memes about the Anglos.
Justin Diaz
>Americans were fucking frightened by it, so much that they gave $100 000 reward to a pilot that deserted with it.
That's just good strategy.
I don't know how much a plane cost back then but I'd think it would be more than 100 grand. For less than the price of a plane they gain a plane and cause the enemy to lose one. It would also demoralise the enemy having their pilots desert.
Easton Clark
We needed to fix our economy somehow, still was a bad idea desu.
Tyler Bell
Polish education.. Without Britain the war wouldn't have been won.
Hunter James
Yes, no thanks to the Brits though. Instead of defending us, what was left of us defended your rainy islands in your own planes.
Josiah Lopez
Germany was leading in the world at the time for military technology and tactics, you expected us to concentrate all our forces on just saving Poland when almost half of occupied europe would destroy us. Battle of Britain was vital for a allied victory.
Levi Barnes
>Germany in 1939 >better military than the British Empire in 1939 and France P-pick one and only one...
Robert Cooper
Wut They had tanks being produced in Germany Austin And czech While the UK was still rebuilding London And France still rebuilding Paris while both being massively in debt France had something like 30 tanks at the beginning of the war and we had even less
Wyatt Long
Mate we could've sandwiched them as early as 1939 and there would be no battle of Britain
You were the chosen ones
Joshua Rivera
>sold by the British to the fucking Soviet Union for money More like it was offered to the Soviets who then stole it and reverse engineered it. Just like they did the Sidewinder air-to-air missiles a decade later.
Pic is a vastly superior aircraft
Justin Jenkins
Can't into turn fight ever, can't into damage, can't something i forget.
Adrian Mitchell
Yes we could have The sitzkrege was stupid But modern day blitz tactics were extremely new at the time
Adam Jones
Absolute shit aircraft luv Also >50 cal W H Y
Easton King
It could down "not Russians we promise" pilots in the Korean war at a 1.5:1 ratio.
Hudson Robinson
Mate, when MiG-15 were deployed, Americans were fighting in fucking Shooting Stars and Panthers. When the Sabres were deployed, Soviets already had MiG-15bis, when Sabres finally got rid of the 12.7mm guns, MiG-17s were in the air.
Americans had better pilots though, which actually means a lot, though the Sabres were not better. China and Korea were using their own greenhorn pilots which were shot down like flies.
Dominic Robinson
>to save you
Zachary Kelly
Like in "the Black Thursday".
Adrian Nguyen
Both sides lied A LOT in their reports in that war Don't trust American reports
Ryan Adams
Definitely not "vastly superior".
But better.
Not like that helped the first year of the war (the part that mattered).
Ryan Sanchez
Correct me if I'm wrong, but they weren't there at all at the beginning of the war.
Jacob Peterson
Except most weren't Russian flown.
They were putting Chinese with 100 hours and NK's with 50 hours in the planes without radar and then telling them to fight.
If the Soviets had gotten fully involved in the war, it would have been a far different ratio.
Also, >muh kdr
Dominic Ward
Not until about December 1950, and most didn't arrive in any meaningful way until 1952.
Generally newer planes that are not flown by untrained Chinese and Gooks are gonna do better than America's best pilots.
Landon Morales
The 1.5:1 ratio is specifically for Soviet pilots. The figure for Chinese and Korean pilots is something ridiculous like 10:1.
Ryan Lee
Roite, k/d is for cheating shitters
According to American sources, I trust?
Samuel Carter
(Citation needed)
How the fuck would we even figure out the Soviet pilot shootdown numbers?
The Soviets were extremely limited in the conflict. They purposefully did that.
It's only fair to compare America versus Soviets when both are actually trying.
Are you seriously quoting American sources on that?
Justin Smith
>quoting American propaganda sources from the anti-Communist age
Only thing more bait are NK numbers
Hunter Long
>Only thing more bait are NK numbers This, Soviets too wrote whatever they wanted in the records
Every statistic from this war is utter bullshit
Jason Morgan
Those are the most reliable sources from that era, you fucking commies. If you think they're faked then come up with a better source. Just staying "ehrma gherd are those american sources??" is not an argument.
Parker Torres
It was before the suez crisis, when they thought they could be big boys and didn't care about america's opinion
Julian Evans
Mate this is literally common knowledge about that war that no matter what source, everything they say about who killed how many enemies is complete bullshit. Americans did it, Soviets did it, Chinks and NKs did it, everyone admits it, yet you quote sources from the USA. Get back to your senses.
Americans had much superior pilots, Soviets had much superior machines and were technologically one step ahead of the US and its allies in that war. That's all we know for sure.
Juan Thompson
>That's all we know for sure. And where is your source for that? Your arse?
If you are unwilling to accept any source as being even remotely accurate then you should honestly shut the fuck up. Because you can't have a constructive discussion about a topic if you believe that you all your sources are wrong or even made up. All you're doing then is guessing and having opinions. The only intellectually honest thing you can say at that point is "I don't know".
