THANK YOU BASED INTEL
AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
THANK YOU BASED INTEL
AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
Other urls found in this thread:
infoworld.com
benchlife.info
guru3d.com
twitter.com
>AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
AMD has been bankrupt for years
What's the difference?
>cannonlake
Lol, you mean that Skylake dieshrink that's coming out in 2 core variants around New Years and the 4 core version in August 2018?
tl note: tops out at 4 cores
Also
>Those 8th Generation Core laptops may be more attractive to customers. The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event, with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.
SLOWER THAN 14NM CHIPS
AHAHAHAHAAH
>JustWait(TM)
>it gets slower
HOLY SHIT A HANDFUL OF 3.1 USB PORTS THIS IS GAME CHANGING THANK YOU SO MUCH BRIAN (SHALOM MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS FROM ISRAEL)
Are you stupid or just plain retarded?
This is the chipset, it has nothing to do with the CPU
Is Intel reliving their modern version of Bulldozer? Netburst wasn't enough?
>with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.
JUST
WAIT
Might as well just wait for their new arch in 2021.
the human eye can only see 10nm per second anyway
It's got everything to do with the CPU because this is a cannonlake PCH and it needs a cannolake socket, it's not backward compatible with Kaby/Skylake
Also all it literally adds is more USB ports from the CHIPSET, CPUs already have USB on them already and that's lower latency.
Who the fuck needs a chipset anymore with the advent of SoCs?
>slower
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event, with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.
Intel completely imploded after getting competition.
It's fucking amazing.
Yeah, thanks for confirming you're retarded
Coffee Lake & Cannonlake uses the same LGA1151 socket that Skylake & Kaby Lake uses
Stay mad, AYYMDPOORFAG
>Coffee Lake & Cannonlake uses the same LGA1151 socket
sauce please, proof you are not talking out of your ass, schlomo
>base 8 core is still a i7 that costs $1000usd+
screencap this
>Skylake, Kabylake, Coffelake and Cannonlake use the same socket
I lold
>Intel completely imploded after getting competition
best timeline
>What's the difference?
6 FREAKING USB 3.1 PORTS
benchlife.info
>Intel 300 系列桌上型處理器用主機板晶片代號為 Cannon Lake PCH-H,就目前知道的,依舊會維持在 LGA1151 腳位,至於是否想容 Kaby Lake 與 Skylake 平台處理器,這就得視牙膏廠的決定。
Stay mad, AYYMDPOORFAGS
>intel realize they can't milk consumer with a new socket each 1% upgrade (((they))) make
based AMD Ryzen keeps on giving, dont you think rabbi?
Unless you are a gaymer you value #cores over single thread performance.
Okay, I concede on the socket part, but what's the point of cannonlake desktop that's coming out in august 2018 when it's skylake shrink?
No, a brainless moron like you simply can't think
It's logical it will be on LGA1151 because it's not a new microarchitecture
Icelake is the next Intel CPU microarchitecture and will use a new socket
Keep on licking AYYMD's ass though, I'm sure you love being an asslicker
SAY IT WITH ME EVERYONE
SLOWER
THAN
14NM
Your delidlake won't use 220W when overclocked but only 195W
THANK YOU INTEL I CAN FINALLY RUN ALL MY 3.1 DONGLES
SLOWER
THAN
14NM
did you lick the cum of your jewish overlords used as TIM in the 7700k? you pleased them very well, filthy goyim
>Keep on licking AYYMD's ass though, I'm sure you love being an asslicker
I'd love to lick Amada's ass tbqh famalam
SLOWER THAN 14NM
HOW THE FUCK DO YOU FUCK UP DIESHRINK THIS HARD.
DELIDDDD THIS
>10nm slower than 14nm
SO...THIS..... Is....THE....POWER.....OF......SKYLAKE.....DIESHRINK.....!
They'll have an upgrade card for the nominal fee of $30USD.
>meanwhile at AMD performance updates for free
this kills the rabbi
>59918470
10nm is still faster than 14nm+ in the chart
Wow, OP, that totally backfired your attempt at shilling Intel
Yeah, only first gen 14nm, kabylake is already on 14nm++
And 10nm is in fact slower than 14nm++ in that chart
wtf i love ayymd now
Even 10nm+ is slower than 14nm++
Canonlake clockspeeds will be atrocious
>59918873
fixed
Broadwell 14nm
Skylake 14nm
Broadwell-E 14nm
Kabylake 14nm+
Coffeelake 14nm++
>JustWait(TM) til 2020 to get faster
Is this supposed to be a joke?
how can 10nm be slower than 14nm on same process? by virtue alone, smaller means you can cram in more shit on to die, meaning better performance or lower heat/power use for the same performance. Doesnt fucking make sense.
>>Coffeelake 14nm++
Also Q1 2018
No, every fucking time someone competes, Intel enters panic mode and fucks up. See Netburst.
>59918908
It's clock speed not the ipc gains from it.
Penryn was slightly faster than Conroe at the same clocks
Transistor performance is slower, as in lower clocks.
Also adding more transistors doesn't make your core faster any longer, Intel learned that a few years ago.
It's not really surprising a virgin 10nm process can't come close to a very mature 14nm process in clockspeed.
>59918914
Q4 2017 is the new date due to AMD
maybe intell should hire more diversity instead of merit? that will fix it! diversity is always better than merit!
QUOTE FUNCTION
NIGGER
So add more cores with the extra transistors instead of increased each core transistor amount, you increase amount of cores you have, i mean its 10nm, so its like 30% smaller, 6-8cores should be standard.
>So add more cores
Cannonlake(10nm) is 4 cores
Because yields are horrible.
so im guessing its low power/laptop only, they wont release this shit on pc
Obviously they will, but considering there's no point in releasing it until they get clocks up to at least Kabylake levels.
Because it will be slower and can you imagine the fucking shitstorm?
ye, exactly what i mean, they wont release it until its faster than 14nm and keep it at select low power devices only
>get on Sup Forums
>see beloved Intel spec sheet thread
>think AMD is gonna get obliterated
>open thread
>toes curl in anticipation of AMD's impending death
>cum while looking at technical sheet
>read 2 posts down
>cock retreats back into bladder from shame
>cock retreats back into bladder from shame
kek, take a (you) my friend
they'll eventually release 20+ cores cannonlake xeon
> that will be $3500 please
>IT
>GETS
>FUCKING
>WORSE
Holy shit Intel just end yourself. For fucks sake hire some fucking quality engineers instead of wasting money on Feminist Frequency.
yet they seem to still walk the earth somehow
financial zombies maybe?
50% more cores, clocks higher than 7th gen
>Chipset isn't important
>Except when it's AMD's chipset then it is
Intelshills, everyone.
Canonlake is 4 core.
And only in q2-q3 2018.
6 core Coffeelake
That's still 14nm, and Q4 2017 at soonest, might as well wait out for zen+ in Q1
That's another skylake refresh. Also a fucking housefire.
>10nm yield mess
>lower performance from 14nm++ to 10nm
>6 jewish Cores Inside™ , they love a good housefire
yeah how about a good CPU for a low price?
This is the level that Intel shitposters have been forced to sink to. "Intel won't screw you over like last time with their socket switches! AMD BTFO!" What a fucking cuck.
You expecting anything close to 5.0 from that? That shit will pull over 300w even if it does go that high, which I doubt at best.
When is Krzanich getting fucking booted? this cuck has stagnated intel.
The sooner the fucking better.
>
How much time would it take for a new ceo to fix things? AMD is releasing shit month after month.
Well if you read the article it said that it has fewer transistors than its 14nm counterparts, because I believe the article was based on the low power 10nm chips.
How long did it take for AMD to unfuck themselves? Multiply this by several times due to sheer size of Intel.
It will draw more than 300w but who uses air cooling?
It'll just be desktop Broadwell again. Much lower clocks than its predecessor and unable to overclock for shit, though it was because of the L4 cache in that case.
The socket and mobo can't handle that much current.
Noob shit here.
Why the fuck doesn't Intel or AyyMD for the lols do a 45nm CPU for higher clocks but beast power consumption?
Because that's dumb and I'm not explaining you the very basics of transistors.
The top end boards will handle it fine
esp the pic related
Just a reminder of Housefire technology
>1.52v
5.8 / 5.5 and stronger vrms than the X370 Taichi
28C 2.5ghz 205W 2667mhz memory
Naples is 32C 200W at ? 2400mhz memory
>2667mhz memory
That's for SR kits. No one uses SR in enterprise.
Wut? These things go with 64GB+ DIMMs, which are all either 4 rank or 8 rank and at 2133MHz
Naples seem to be 180W, there might be a higher clocked 200W version though
>32 DIMMs for 2P boards
What in ungodly fuck is THAT?
If you're interested in advertising on Sup Forums.org (including but not limited to this board), you'll need to speak with administration to discuss monthly rates, as well as terms and conditions. Thank you.
8 core Ryzen at 3GHz and full load consumes under 50 watt.
A 200W Naples would therefore clock at around 3GHz on all cores.
8 channels per socket thats what.
/thread
SLOWER THAN 14NM
L
O
W
E
R
T
H
A
N
1
4
N
M
K
E
K
Oh. This kills the jew.
10/10
>B0
Literally clocks from September/August 2016, I can only imagine what the situation will be in June
"Handling" it enough to run a benchmark is a lot different from "handling" it 24/7.
Literally nothing of note.
A socket change next year keeps the goyim in fear.
>release new generation of processors
>only add usb 3.1
>innovation
Intel is apple of the cpu game