Was turey considered European before turkies came?

Was turey considered European before turkies came?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oghuz_Turks
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Turkic_dynasties_and_countries
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Völkerwanderung#Ethnogenese
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It was mostly Greek so...

implication by question

it was called asia
then asia minor

What race are Turkish people? pls no meme answers like cockroach.

literally caucasian

We Greeks said that this is Asia.

turish?

very different
what region?

Well.... they're Turkic.
Proofs?

Most Turks in Turkey are from Oghuz tribe of Turkic people

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oghuz_Turks

Tuks are a tribe from mongolia.
Their language family is literally named after a mountain in mongolia that they lived near back in the days.
Look up Gokturks and Seljuks for historical context

They're not Turkic, and he meant Caucasian by the Caucasus mountain range.

>Turkey
>Not Turkic

Being turkish is not something about race but most of the turks are either mongoloid or caucasoid

Biologically or socially?
Turks are a Turkic people.

Phenotypes vary but can be summed up as Eurasian.

Only the language is Turkic. Turkics are subhumans.

then why did they name their country turey? if they are not turies, why no name it no-turie?

We saw how greeks are butthurt about turks and we named the country turkey even if we are not turks

mamluk arab mongrels, lterally cockroaches

>t*rks
>turkic

love this meme

Woah, careful there abiut that subhuman talk der fürer

Turkey is by far the largest Turkic country.

>t*rks
>turkic

pick fucking one, ahmet berlinoglu

Stay jelly.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Turkic_dynasties_and_countries

>germans
>not subhumans

hmm, interesting, why not name your country shit? everyone hates shit, and everyone hates you?
so why no merge two franchises into one?

Turkey was really the bridge connecting Europe from the sand kingdoms. Hence why Istanbul was so important. Then a bunch of subterranean cockroaches burrowed out of no where (personally that shit creeps me out) and took over the land.

Turkey was really the bridge connecting Europe from the sand kingdoms. Hence why Istanbul was so important. Then a bunch of subterranean cockroaches burrowed out of no where (personally that shit creeps me out) and took over the land.

Predominantly Native Anatolian mixed with the original East Asian component of Turks

Kurds are the original Anatolians?

They're not, native Anatolians are a lot paler

The original anatolians were related to the Greeks.

None of the people that live in the area today are genetically related to the original inhabitants.

Turks are mongols, Kurds are negroid flees and the Greeks are Turk rape Babies.

t. genetic scientist.

The peninsula is Asia Minor. So geographically it never was European. Before the Turks forced their language there the people were Greek who are considered European

actually turks are a confederation of tribes from all over central asia: from turkestan to manchuria. "Turk" identity became a thing only after Gokturks, and many different tribes under Gokturks adopted "Turk" identity after them.
>asia minor
Thrace was obviously European tho
mix of anatolian natives (who are also different people in different regions, racially) and turks, and then a little bit of caucasians/balkanites/semitics
no. kurds don't live in anatolia even today, they live in upper mesopotamia. they were native to Zagros mountains in Iran, and they were brought to where they are now (in Turkey) by Selim the first.

the people were Anatolians who were forced into Greek language by the greeks

No.
But definetly White before t*rks came(at least west anatolia and black sea region along with causcasia)
fuck t*rks

Don't fall into te traps of anachormnisms like that one Turk and Fin claiming Turks where predominantly ''native anatolians''

Such views are political, not factual.

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Völkerwanderung#Ethnogenese
''Die moderne Forschung hat nachgewiesen, dass Gleichartigkeiten der Sprache, der Kleidung oder der Waffen allein für eine ethnische Zuordnung kaum aussagekräftig sind.[10] Auch die in den letzten Jahren immer öfter angewandte Methode, die Migrationen durch DNA-Analysen nachvollziehbar zu machen, ist aus diesem Grund kritisiert worden, da sie weniger objektiv sei, als ihre Vertreter annähmen, und die Bedeutung der Gene für die ethnische Identität überschätze.''

Turks are Turkic by defintion and definitely.

*cringes*