What distro and de are you using?

What distro and de are you using?

Fedora and XFCE

KDE neon and kde

Windows 10.

Ubuntu (16.04 LTS with latest kernel via HWE) and Unity 7

it just werx

Was using Debian with KDE.
Switched back to Xubuntu.

Antergos on desktop
ubuntu on server
ubuntu on laptop

antergos
>with xfce
ubuntu on server
>gnome
ubuntu on laptop
>xfce

Linux is only worth using if your time is worthless.

Void Linux, no DE. Openbox.

Arch and LXQt

I actually started using it because i was tired of wasting time troubleshooting xp. (my old comp can't handle win7)

Opensuse Tumbleweed and KDE

Debian testing and GNOME. GNOME because it's the only DE that is both stable and not naked like XFCE. Testing is a little buggy so on my next (re)installation of loonix I'm either going with Debian Unstable or Fedora.

Mint with Cinnamon.
Used to use Fedora with Gnome 3 but I hated the tablet interface and the dumb quirks of Fedora *tips*

debian/budgie

Debian / Mate

It's the best lightweight and user-friendly distro for daily use

Mint / Mate

Gentoo, and 2bwm.

Arch i3

void/i3 on laptop, arch/gnome on desktop

Arch Cinnamon

obongo + MATE

OpenSUSE Leap with MATE. Trying to decide if it's worth it to switch to Tumbleweed or not.

What exactly makes Openbox just a window manager instead of a DE? Never fully understood that distinction

A DE is a meta-package containing multiple ackagas, including a WM.

Look at it as a pre-boxed LEGO.
i'd rather build a house out of blocks i like than to use a prebuilt one with instructions.

(my analogy sucks, but yoo hopefully get my point)

>dat misspelling.
i should get to sleep.

GNU/Lubuntu/LXDE

xunoobtu

ew linux. ew de.

That makes complete sense actually, thanks for the explanation. So what would those other packages be that would make up a full DE?

Xubuntu

file manager, toolbars, widgets, image viewer, etc.

Basically a full suite of programs designed to all work together to make a fully-fledged desktop environment.

depends on the DE actually. They can be fully fledged (GNOME, KDE [e.g. calculator, office, whatnot]) to minimal lxde, i3 and so on.
WMs can be undercategorized in tiling WNs and sracking WMs. you should be able to replace indicidual parts too with some efforts, if that is what you desire for whatever reason.

However, i recommend simoly googling guides or asking google directly such questions.
Or as i feel not in spoonfeeding mood right now, sorry senpai.

Debian stable, Xfce

it Just Werks

Arch Linux with XFCE because I fell for the meme and am now too lazy to change for Fedora. Going to wait until Ubuntu 18.04 to go back to my sweet sweet GNOME

Windows is only worth installing on the metal of your machine if you have to (employer etc.) or you don't value your machine, your time, or your money. I use linux and windows in combo. Running windows on the metal is like you are renting your machine from microsoft.

Puppy Linux (tahrpup) for my old laptop, and ubuntu for my web server.

osx and kwm

Manjaro with XFCE. Pretty comfy, basically arch without the terminal autism.

Arch Linux KDE

Gentoo stable, with xfce, though sometimes I switch to awesome-wm for variety.

Peppermint and LXDE

What a retarded comment

Tumbleweed is pretty great desu

Kubuntu, which answers the two questions. And yes, Kubuntu is indeed a distribution.

Void + sway

Manjaro
Xfce

>not using kde neon with gnome

Arch with GNOME, as of a few hours ago. Arch is interesting, it almost feels like it's meant to be a "learning distro" in that it forces you to do everything in atomic little pieces

AmigaOS with Workbench

> 50 replies
> One person using i3

I thought Sup Forums was cool

I always found the tablet interface to be better.
In no world do I need to have 180 icons on my screen at once.

Reduce the clutter of your mind by expanding the size of everything on desktop. The iPhone can only hold 24 icons on screen at once and no one has any problems with its interface. It's so intuitive 5 year olds can learn it.

In the age of 1080p monitors where your eyes literally cannot utilize the real estate of the whole screen, is it really necessary to have 64x64 icons and 12 point text like we still have tiny CRTs and need to cram info onto them in order to get work done like it's 2002?

You thought wrong.

sierra and 7
(also 7 on the x220 since one hdd is damaged and i wont risk putting a garbage os on my only functional 2.5. it might be conscience but that hard drive was fine before i put freebsd on it)

Windows 8.1 on my desktop, Arch with Cinnamon on my Chromebook.

CentOS and Cinnamon - Desktop
Mint and Cinnamon - Laptop

Ubuntu 16.04 with i3.

You do know you can just install the Gnome DE right...?

CentOS 7 with MATE. Best shit ever.

my SUSEbros

Leap 42.2 & KDE here

arch xfce

yea.. cause paying a bag of money for badly written OS with the worst community I have ever seen and error like "something happened" , totalz worth your time

everyone here who uses arch, how the fuck do you install this shit

like I haven't found a single example of the general shit you should type to dualboot arch w/ w10 in BIOS-MBR mode

it's pretty easy actually
give me your mail I can send you instructions

Debian, of course.

bump Ubuntu 16.04/Unity
tried Fedora because of driver issues, however it became slow as fuck on the second day and a fresh install of Ubuntu fixed them

OpenSUSE Tumbleweed - GNOME

Tumbleweed KDE, although I'm going to install gentoo

nice prompt

i3 arch

have you read the wiki? what cant you do?

you motherfuck

which version of linux just werks and lets me put my taskbar on the left side and use an animated gif as a wallpaper?

all of them?

can you prove this with a webm of animated anime girls.gif on your desktop?

ubuntu gnome. although im thinking of switching back to windows 8.1

>using DE on server

Gentoo with i3

>polar ice caps melting lmao frick off randyty

Linux Mint, KDE