Monitor general

why are there no perfect monitors? It seems like every monitor has at least one easily solvable problem and it bugs me.

These two are the closest for me so far:
bestbuy.com/site/acer-kg1-series-kg251q-bmiix-24-5-led-fhd-freesync-monitor-black/5793523.p?skuId=5793523

bestbuy.com/site/dell-s2415h-23-8-ips-led-hd-monitor-black/8544005.p?skuId=8544005

what do you guys think? I'm looking to mount them, so I'm leaning towards the Acer because 1ms response time and 75hz, but I have an Acer now and it's already got dead pixels after just over 2 years so I dont really know about the build quality. Dell is more expensive, higher response time, and 60hz, but I know Dell is reliable and it looks better.

I've got a dell 19" that I've had since 2006 and it is still working perfectly. No dead pixels. (Although i do need to clean it)

yeah, Dell monitors always look and feel like they're built with quality. I'm assuming that's the reason for it being about 40 bucks more, despite having the 6ms and 60hz. That's what my current monitor has and it looks and feels fine for me even when gaming, but the dead pixels is kinda pushing me away from Acer.

>even considering TN gaymen trash
ayyyy

i'm not really familiar with the specifics of monitor technology, what's the issue with it? I know IPS is the standard but I dont know why.

Ips has better viewing angles and color, altough the blacks are lacking. Tn are esentially cheaper because of this, but have shorter g2g time. Just get a 4-5ms ips monitor if you're really concerned about gaming, promise you won't notice the difference.

Really can't decide if i should save money with a 24" or splurge on a 27" which is essentially twice as much

why does every monitor that attempts to be a thin bezel monitor have something thick at the bottom

fuck, its so annoying

The Dell UP3017Q almost happened, but it's only 60Hz. Would've paid $1500 extra for 120Hz.

>buying a monitor smaller than 34"