Why do you need a better processor than i3?

why do you need a better processor than i3?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=SFS8maO8emA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I need more than two cores.

Because i want to run programs more demanding than pong

>buying a dual core desktop processor
>in 2017

Anyone who buys anything less than a quad core, 8GB RAM and a SSD for a new computer today is a cuck and a moron.

video games

I got one. Sold it cause it was holding back my system. Would get a used 6600k on r/hardwareswap for under $200

I can get a used laptop with those specs. lol

You don't most people spend 90% of their time fapping in internet explorer with their i7 OCd to 5GHz

Because it is not enough to saturate the memory.

because 7 has more syllables than 3

Its more sufficient for daily browsing. Useless for anything else. I'll switch it mainly because of the noise and power draw and the SATA 1 ports.

I don't, running an i3 6100 right now.

The only times where i could use some extra power is when I'm transcoding many FLAC files to Opus.

for vidya

Kabylake HT pentiums are now all you need

theres no reason for an i3 now

if the 5640s were in stock i would have gotten that but the 4600 is also better than the i3-4170

plus much better graphics processing

i couldnt run 1440k with the 4600 graphics, the 510+ handle it fine

XEONS
E
O
N
S

why do you need a better processor than core 2 duo?

No, they're really not.

GPU would be bottlenecked
>inb4 'gaymer'

Logical choice for gaymen who don't need AVX whatsoever.

Bad bait thread, anyone who has to ask why someone wants more power is a fucking retard

I had to think long and hard before I upgraded from my C2D E7600. An upgrade to a Q9550 would've made more sense to me, but I ended up with an i5 anyways just because I wanted something new. Most of what I do with my computer works well with older CPUs, and what doesn't I can live without.

Later I also bought a Pentium G3450 for my server. That too is more than fast enough I feel.

corelet

why do you need a better car than Trabant?

bad comparison

I like recording my gameplay sometimes. Other times I make dumbass videos like this
youtube.com/watch?v=SFS8maO8emA
If I were to try to make that same video using an i3 instead of my i7 not only would it take way fucking longer to get it rendered and finished, but the i3 would probably hit high as fuck temperatures just from having the editor open.

Because I have four tasks running in Boinc continuously and I want to use my computer for other things at the same time.

I'd rather something that can take a bigger payload and has adequate handling. and can do many miles at high rpm without consuming much fuel.
Trabants are known for overheating if you don't remove the hood, instantly voiding warranty. Their motors can be quite strong but do not have many cylinders removing any possibility of undertaking heavy loads in any reasonable manor.
One other problem widely overlooked is performance modding. Less cylinders will rev high, but these are actually limited by valve bounce, often causing a stuttering effect. The RPM gauge will still read as if it's still in high ranges, but that's from using outdated friction gauges that are not responsive enough to display it correctly. Massive performance losses happen when it stutters.
The maker of the Trabant has also welded the carburetors reeds in place to prevent any mods. This can be overcome by purchasing the Trabant-K for an additional fee. And warranty is broken once modding. One vendor was offering unlocked Trubants at no additional cost, but were swiftly put in their place.
Should you wish to upgrade the engine to a newer model you will require an expensive new K frame. That for some inexplicable jewish reason has the space grade indium tungsten bolts on them rather than the block. Making it easy to fuck them up, and have to buy another NEW K frame as it was fault of the installer, not the designer.
Your move.

OP clearly said NEED not WANT. If you want to compensate for you cheapened manhood with CPU powe that's fine, but you can't justify why you actually need it unless you're a gamer.

>not enough to saturate the memory.
Wat?

Im happy with mine user.
Why would any1 outside of Sup Forums need more than a N2840?

I like my i3-4170. I'll use it until I get a cheap used xeon.

gentoo
e
n
t
o
o

just buy a celeron if you really still want dual core shit. i3s are just overpriced celerons.

For a regular domestic usage N2840 would be enough for Linux. The other two OSes are adding bells and whistles regularly in order to force people buy new hardware.

In some cases a job requires fast hardware, computer graphics, CADs and so forth.

Sup Forums is entirely poisoned by gaymers and their threads about Ryzen, gaymes on Linux and user useless for techies threads.

Cause Core i3's are absolute shit

>hardwareswap
>used hardware ever for any reason

Heavy graphic
Yesterday I was rendering fractals while editing raw photos

>Not i5

Who in the fuck only buys what tjey need? Moat peoole buy what they can afford for some of us that means i7 with a gtx 1070

That's a lot of projection in that post

I have an i7, but without the games I play and my animation/rendering stuff it would be very hard to justify. Most people don't need more than an i3, and lots of people don't have more than an i3.

But why dhoudl someone limit themselves? What good does it do anyone for someome to by an i3 over and i7?

money, mostly
otherwise, buy what you can afford instead of spending more in the future if you eventually start needing that much power

This
In addition most users own laptops instead of desktops so you have to take into consideration things like form factor and battery life.

Because I use virtualization technology and often times my desktop is virtualized because my main computer is a Hypervisor with external storage.

The only true answer.
Most posters in this thread are newfags.

i7s is where it's at my nignog

Why would you buy anything less than an i11?

Converting videos on my i3 was a mistake.

more than enough for everything I need

>windows 10

im still using a i5 2500k

>quad core
Meme.

>8 GB RAM
Meme.

>SSD
Now THAT is a meme!

Generally you should aim for the best CPU you can afford and a mid range GPU. CPU's tend to have a much longer usable lifespan.

For video games

Games

Rethink your life choices.

1. Video Games
2. Workflow (Video Encoding and other highly multi-threaded applications)

Because I'm not a corelet.

Don't you mean hexacore and 16gb's of ram?

I'm okay on my broadlel coreM passive meme with 4gb of ram for non-workstation needs. I do like silent computers.

if you dont have a core2duo go back to krautchan

Using a Ryzen 7 1700 since today
Feels great

>buys high end computer
>puts w10 on it

next cpu will be some amd. the jewtel cpu is still good enough for my use tho so i can wait until those new boards get enough bios updates and good linux support.

t. based Trabant tuner

Photoshop and after effects :3

You're a meme!

Obvious bait, but for real workloads, an i5/ryzen 1600 is minimum.
Other than that, for normie shit an i3 is even too much

Doesn't the 1400 match the i5 in normal workloads?
1600 in an overkill compared to i5 in non gaming work.