Here's mine. Fiber connection.
Post your internet speed!
...
Just a slight difference between the two.
How'd I do?
Oh sorry. Upled the wrong pic. Here's the right one:
Feels good to be end game internet for at least the next few years.
>b-b-but you'll never see that in a real world scenario!
It's okay
Quite asymmetric…
That's most of the world sadly.
Unless you're on fiber anyway.
it's alright
How much do you pay for that?
a very close second place
I know; there's not a good server near me to actually prove that my university campus has two 40 gbit uplinks
Not to mention I doubt you'd have a NIC capable of even 10gbps.
I don't, no. Unfortunately, single connections are capped at 1Gbs. What I actually wanted to say is that, in theory, I could hit 1000/1000 on Speedtest, but there are too many bottlenecks, including my NIC. At this point it's pure chance whether they or I have the fastest internet, as you can't really measure it anymore.
I know the feeling.
Also, since it's going through TCP/IP protocol, it's got ~5.5% overhead anyway using normal frame sizes.
Unless your ISP supports Jumbo Frames, the maximum you'll see on a 1gbps NIC is ~950mbps.
I'm provisioned for 1024/1024mbps, but I cap at around 950mbps because of overhead.
Why pay $100/mo to browse Sup Forums?
No one needs such speeds. I would be glad about 6 Mbits. Triple speed!
>Needings 4 days to download GTAV
I actually pay €12 a month for this. Welcome to The Netherlands :^]
I had 150mbps, and with 4 heavy internet users on that connection, I noticed times where I would have to throttle my downloads so i didn't disrupt anyone else.
I was also paying $139.99 a month for 150/150mbps + TV + phone.
Now i'm paying $100 a month for 940/880 mbps + TV + phone. With the same ISP, and no data caps.
Now everyone can be streaming or downloading pretty much unrestricted, because 99% of things cap at ~300-500mbps anyway, so that leaves easily half my bandwidth unused for everyone else on the network.
tldr; not everyone needs it, but it sure is nice to have.
I pay 30 € for mine, I couldn't imagine to share it with someone else. Of course no data caps in Germany.
I had a 50 Mbit connection in the past, this was incredibly fast. Hopefully I can get Magenta @Home by January 2018. LTE + DSL for around 40 €, my only solution for better internet. It will be around 20 MBit then. I really wish I could cancel my contract...
currently on 320/30 connection..... theres gig fiber literally a block from my place...yeah
I only pay for the internet and use key sharing to decrypt the satellite channels.
A bit slower than it should be, but it's fine.
anything past 300-400mbps is going to be unnoticable for normal use anyway.
Only thing it's good for is downloading and if you've got 5-10+ heavy users at once.
>only thing it's good for is uploading
ATT Fiber
cox gigablast in phoenix
...
What the fuck is this font rendering
Data caps?
I have font smoothing off.
Best available in my area. Advertised at 300 but I consistently get numbers around this. 100/month. Cox
And I forgot the fucking picture
Also data caps out at 1024 GB
>1024 GB
what a rip off.
In a house of 5 heavy internet users I alone regularly see ~800GB a month in traffic.
Well it's just me and my mom so all the data gets used by me alone. Highest I've gotten is 600
...
You'd think with almost 400mbps they'd cut you some slack...
You just hitted the asymmetric record.
Man I wish I had better internet. Shame google fiber is ded
rogers hates upload speed
>hitted
Not sure if memeing or just not from english speaking country.
It's still "hit" however, not "hitted"
>You just hit the asymmetric record.
really the only good thing about having fiber is the upload speeds, doing any sort of uploading (online backups, dropbox, seeding, youtube, twitch, etc) is painless and super fast.
>any sort of uploading (online backups, dropbox, seeding, youtube, twitch, etc)
Posting on Sup Forums… I mean… /hr/
I couldn't get used to that. Don't like to have to stop downloading my porn.
...
no datacaps for gigablast plans
Makes sense, comcast does the same with their 2gbps plan.
...
...
What sucks is that this is considered really good for Comcast.
Not that user but 74.99 with hbo so I think 59.99?
>this is considered really good for Comcast.
...is it?
Comcast offers this in my area.
...Do you understand what a screenshot is?
:O
>$150 for 2gbps
>the most i can get is 30mbps
I've heard of it yes
Don't worry, what they don't tell you is they can charge "up to" $500 for installation and "up to" $500 for activation. (which if you decide you want a refund in the first 30 days, you only get the install fee back, not the activation).
On top of that "up to" $1000 upfront cost, you'll be limited to 1gbps unless you buy 10GbE network equipment. Which conservatively for a single desktop setup would be ~$300-500.
So overall, a very expensive proposition, and even if you don't plan on upgrading to a 10GbE NIC and just using a 1GbE NIC, you're still paying "up to" $1000 install/activation fees.
But I guess it's nice they lock in the $149.99 price for two years.
I fucking hate comcast
That ping is just rude
Oh baby. Lets download some torrents.
>satellite internet
surely there are other options...
LOL
...
...
>$149.99
fuck dude i wish i could get that
>tfw comcast is the only provider in my area unless i want 1mbps DSL
Well it's because I can get 1gbps from Verizon for $70 a month, or 1gbps from RCN for also $70 a month.
Comcast had to lower their 2gbps price, even if it is faster, 99% of people will be using it at 1gbps speeds anyway.
And even at $150, i doubt very many people are getting it considering the other gigabit offerings around here.
jews
fuck off ookla shills
> Getting an upload speed to match your download speed
What sorcery is this?! Fuckin yanks, my people have suffere through 0.9 Mbps up speed for too long.
...
Cheating from inside the data center
...
Not for Mediacom, though
It's going to be like 5 more years before we get gigabit Ethernet in Canada for residential.
>Feelsbadman
...
I got the opposite through wifi