Intel on suicide watch
wccftech.com
Intel on suicide watch
wccftech.com
>wccftech.com
>sandy bridge on top
Fuck yeah
>Sandy Bridge: 75.9%
>Ryzen 5: 83.9%
intel pajeet failed math
>wccftech.com
It's still on top of the list
because its the earliest cpu on the list dumbass its by time
No it's on top of the list because it was the cpu release ever
...
>No it's on top of the list because it was the cpu release ever
poojeet learn english
>4.1 ghz
DELET THIS
...
Holy shit! It's a wccftech article that isn't a shitty clickbait rumor that tries to make AMD look bad! I can't fucking believe it!
lol cucked communities.intel.com
>he hasn't read it
I did, but then I just noticed this was just posted. They really have no shame in posting complete bullshit, do they? wccftech.com
(Volta is not even remotely on the list of covered material, it's all meme AI and self driving car shit)
>wojacks and false flagging
Oh another console war thread on Sup Forums.
Wait a second.
Volta comes out in September! GTC is perfect for it like it was perfect for Pascal
>I literally believe everything I read on the internet, the post
Vega won't even last 3 months, get BTFO poojet
>pootech.com
You can crawl back to wccftech now, retard.
Not him, but you totally got wrecked there lad
...
GDDR6 won't even be ready until 2018 according to Samsung and SKHynix. At best we'll get an introduction to Volta's architecture soon and then a paper launch or product announcement later this year and actual products to market in Q1 to Q2 2018
ITT
poopowerup shill detected
>projection
techpowerup are shills now? You mean the guys that intentionally benchmarked a recent game using AMD's older 4xx series of GPUs instead of the more recent 5xx that increase performance by 10-12%? They're shills? Consider killing yourself.
he was making a joke about the url fucking smoothbrains
>You mean the guys that intentionally benchmarked a recent game using AMD's older 4xx series of GPUs instead of the more recent 5xx that increase performance by 10-12%?
Are you really trying to criticize TPU for not benching a rebranded, OCed 480 against stock NVIDIA cards? Get in the oven, Pajeet.
AMD refused to send Techpowerup any Fury X samples because they knew how much they are shilling against them. this is a fact that made it to their home page as "news" and was the top discussed AMD related topic for half a year.
The second most popular AMD related news they had was "AMD had no videocard driver updates for half a year", which conveniently ignored that a) they had no new cards at the time to release drivers for, and b) they released dozen or so beta driver updates in the mean time.
>rebranded, OCed 480
Wrong, fuckstick. youtube.com
>Get in the oven, Pajeet.
You got your memes mixed up.
Figures, fanboyism and under-the-table money always end up creating shitshows like this.
>Wrong, fuckstick.
?
It's objective fact that the 580 is simply an OCed 480. There's no difference in performance clock for clock. The obvious AMD shill you linked also corroborates this, so I'm not sure what your argument even is. Why are you upset about reviewers fairly representing products, snowflake?
>having little kids saved on your computer
are you a pedophile?
there's literally nothing wrong with having pictures of little kids saved in a computer
#LGBTP #tolerance #againsthate
580 has better stock clocks and OCs better than a 480. This has been confirmed multiple times. You're a dumbass shill. 1060 lost, get over it, fgt.
...
>580 has better stock clocks
it doesn't.
> and OCs better than a 480.
it doesn't. max OC, if you're lucky, still sits around 1450mhz. most 480/580 can't even hit that without suicide voltage.
>You're a dumbass shill. 1060 lost, get over it, fgt.
1060 is objectively the better card, only reason to ever buy the 480/580 is if it was considerably cheaper (like $100 cheaper) to offset the lower overall perf and perf/w.
has better stock clocks
>it doesn't.
fact denial
>to offset the lower overall perf and perf/w.
pajeet, you know nit everyone has to burn petrol for power right?
niuce meme