End of C?

tiobe.com/tiobe-index/
Assembly is rising while C is in steep decline? o.O

>End of C?
finally

i wish assembly gains more popularity

its about time.who uses a language that doesnt support strings in 2017 anyway?

Assembly is highly unportable, unlike C which is very portable.

>doesn't support strings
you dumb fucking nigger what do you think a string is? It's always just a \0 terminated character array, C just doesn't fucking hide it from you because you're not a nigger

>Just use Java for everything

Donald Trump is the current president of the United States. He is the successor to the previous president, Barrack Obama.

>This program only works one one computer because it's incompatible with any other processor.

false equivalency

i knew it that some faggot are going to bring up char arrays.CHAR ARRAYS ARE NOT STRINGS FAGGOT.WHEN I USE A STRING I EXPECT IT TO WORK OUT OF THE BOX.I DONT WANT TO FUCK AROUND WITH ARRAYS JUST FOR DEALING WITH TEXT AND COUNTING WHICH INDEX THE FUCKING 'K' LETTER IS ON.

wow\0 so\0 edgy\0

C doesn't even have booleans

pajeets everywhere on suicide watch

Pajeets used java.

and C

The future is JavaScript. Everything will be made in JavaScript in the near future.

> TIOBE
It's pretty random quite frequently.

> Assembly is rising while C is in steep decline? o.O
Unlikely to be accurate. The actual changes are probably less extreme overall.

No they don't.

Can't you just
#define true 1
#define false 0

typedef char Bool;

For a makeshift boolean?

Why would you have any use for assembly? If two processor handle x86 differently it will result in programs that work different or not even compatible.

VISUAL BASIC DOES IT AGAIN
/wdg/ BTFO!!!!!!!
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT CAN STOP VB????

That's because there's literally no reason to use C instead of C++ pretty much anywhere.

Assembly, on the other hand, still has a niche in algorithms that are optimized for specific architectures. C and C++ can't replace that.

#include
bool hasBooleans = true;

for the love of god no lol
javascript is so fucking disgusting

...

yes, but an int will be faster

No it wont

kek

Actually it will. There's a type called "uint_fast8_t" in which is guaranteed to be typedef'd to the fastest datatype on the system you're compiling for that has at least 8 bits of precision. On x86 this is defined to be "int", and on x86_64 it is defined to be "long long". If you don't believe me, open stdint.h on your own system and check.

if processor can run x86 instruction set binary, it will run it, EOF

i think they are using term 'assembly language' for every instruction set there is, so i would not be surprised if this data is correct

This is exactly what #include does.

pajeets can't into c

A faster Python would kill everything, not just C

Fuck Drumpf and fuck white people

sounds nice, came buckets to the thought of python superseding PHP

>A faster Python
Nim

literally who

This thread again...
When will webdev and pajeet learn ?
It's not because you don't understand that it's bad.

looks like a nice little language, user

Oh cool, although I haven't quite worked out how _Bool translates into an actual data type: without stdbool.h, mentions of _Bool won't compile and I see no mention of _Bool getting defined in stdbool.h.