AMD cucks Intel by leaking their 16 core HEDT platform before Intel can even announce their lowly 10 core Skylake-X...

>AMD cucks Intel by leaking their 16 core HEDT platform before Intel can even announce their lowly 10 core Skylake-X details, specs, and pricing.

Snow Owl HEDT = Whiteraven
>these probably aren't even the high end clocks.

Meme names

>(((White)))raven

The absolute madmen actually did it.

Fuck 16 core is sexy as fuck, i want it

AMD the CPU manfac of the White Race.

Pajeet = R E J E C T

They only use chink phone SOCs anyways.

The frequencies on the hexadeca-core are pretty nuts. It's going to absolutely crush Skymeme-E for productivity tasks.

How many PCIe lanes are these supposed to have?

64

64?

2700/3200 is low for the 12 core. Not sure why someone would get that for HEDT.
I'm almost certain 2700/3200 is Snowy Owl clocks and HEDT will be higher.

May be even higher than the 3100/3600. But maybe not due to the double speed infinity fabric which uses more power and puts out more heat.

>How many PCIe lanes are these supposed to have?
Not sure. Isn't Naples 64 each, 128 for 2? So maybe 32 unless the chipset has more. 32+8 seems likely.

No, Naples is 128 lanes for 1 socket with 64 lanes used for xGMI link in 2P system.

...

bout fucking time.

my Q6600 is getting old as fuck but I can't justify going 4 core again.

why should we be impressed with 6 8 12 24 or even 36 cores when nvidia manages to put 2000-6000 cores in their chips (Nintendo switch has many many more than 36 I don't know exactly but it's anywhere around 500-4058)? genuine question. another question I've always wondered is why the motherboards don't just support 4-8 CPUs with clever power management? is that not feasible?

>not even one can hit 4ghz stock

ANOTHER MASSIVE DISAPPOINTMENT

Please be bait.

...

Why not just get 6c/12t?

>
>
>
>these probably aren't even the high end clocks.

>AMD cucks Intel
into the trash it goes

why can't you autistic sperglords just make posts with actual facts than just saying "hurr X cucks Y" and then backtrack a week later by saying "hurr X rekt"

>see: every fucking product launch, especially AMD

Bad move.
Would be better wait till Intel say their prices, now Intel will have to launch at lower prices turning their product more competitive and limiting how much AMD could ask for theirs.

can this CPU architecture even do high end clocks? everything seems to point to no

>t. cuck

These are leaks. Not final specs nor pricing.
Intel will assume they still have a significant clock speed advantage over 3.6GHz, then they wind up being higher.

>intel
>lower prices
Not a chance.

128 maybe

It's LITERALLY 2 1600X or 1800X put together under one IHS.
So yes. They can do 4.0-4.25GHz on all 12 or 16 cores if you have a 180-300w TDP cooler.
Like a Le Grande Macho with a fan would keep 1.4v on 16 cores cool fine.

4ghz is not high clock speeds. 5ghz is the new standard. git gud.

We need LONGER PIPELINE.

12 core Skylake-X might be better for AVX heavy workloads but those are uncommon.

Is the waiting finally over? Is AMD back?

...

The 12 core part is also not expected to be launching at the initial Skylake X release though.

>that piece of shit house next door literally melting
american construction lmao

when are these supposed to come out, june?

>16 cores
>can't even mega-task

>tfw Intel will clock lower with the same core counts
Salty and sweet.

Shut the fuck up.

>netburst

Northwood was okay. It's Prescott that was fucking insane.

Vinyl siding is cheap for a reason.

It's actually Whitehaven
even beter

>ANOTHER MASSIVE DISAPPOINTMENT
just like broadwell-e

Nice, 0.01% of computing world will use these chips for encoding their Chinese cartoons and streaming hearthstone

Epic

Make me punk

>Whitepower

I'd be pretty happy with 16 cores at anything over 3ghz desu. If they can OC or turbo much higher for light loads, all the better.

Just don't fuck me on pcie lanes, I've got capture cards and multiple ssds to run

...

and google and amazon will use it for their web services - if they are really better than the untel alternatives.

Wonder how much they are though.

Probably $800-$1200 for the high end 12 core and $1250-$1750 for the high end 16 core.

at least twice as the comparable consumer products with half the cores, but probably more.

It will still be way cheaper than intel.

Oh no surely Intel will be BTFO this time...

> Snow Owl = Whiteraven
AMD is retarded.

They've already been BTFO on x99 and x299 is doa as it seems. back to israel for some more r&d, chaim.

I mean, Ryzen has *way* higher IPC than the Q6600 does. And more cores. And SMT.

Are you one of the guys that worked on Netburst?

Google will buy some tens of thousands of them, and use them for Youtube videos.

>Meanwhile at Intlel

And yet it's slower. How wierd.

see

It's not, the only reason why it doesn't perform so well in muh gaems it's due to Intel's ICC gimping anything that's not Intel
Ryzen does 5 instructions per cycle, Kably Lake does 4
It gets even worse on purely FP, Ryzen does 4 128 bit instructions, while Kaby Lake can do just 2
The only thing where Kaby Lake can beat Ryzen it's on 256 bit instructions, Ryzen and KL can 2 two per cycle, but Ryzen can just write one, KL can write 2

The comparison was to a Q6600. It was just a bad troll attempt.

When will these be released?

Computex or E3

It's ok guys, Intel invested $300 million into diversity, it will pay off any minute now. :^)

More JustWait? AMD is such a fucking disappointment fucking shit, they can't do anything right

POOTEL STUTTERING HOUSEFIRES

You'll be waiting for Volta for another 8 months, might as well wait 2 weeks for Computex :)

>JustWaitTM AMD will surely deliver!!!!111

Seems like you've become so delirious you've started visibly shaking in your chair.

I suggest some sleep. Failing that, go see a specialist.

Reminder that the vast majority of software can't scale to make use of more than two cores and that therefore additional cores just gimp performance in single-threaded tasks by adding overhead

Unless you are rendering videos or other niche tasks these zillion-core processors are useless

Good thing the datacenter is a 60 billion USD market and nobody has to worry about you gamer tards there.

Ok use jewtel then

We're talking about professional use CPUs here, child. Fuck off back to you absolute know nothing gaymur manbabby.

HURR MOAR COARS

JUST ADD MOAR CLARK GUYZE

HURR

Maybe they should add a loo in their engineering section so this retardation finally stops.

Skylake-X is 12 cores

>the vast majority of software can't scale to make use of more than two cores
reminder that you can run multiple instances of such software and ryzen is particularly good at it (see kernel compile benchmarks on some non-gaymur review sites)

a lot of server shit works that way as do software build systems

Don't bother, he'll just repeat himself with "only 0.1% need that" and "gamers are 99% of the market"
Kinda completely ignoring the desktop market just keeps shrinking while datacenter, mobile and embeded keep growing

yeah i don't care as i'm one of that 0.1%

i love how gaymurs think everything is about them, spoiled brats desu

really they're just profitable testers for shit before it goes to the other markets

can't wait to instal gentoo on it

...

>basically the same clockspeeds as consumer Ryzen (just as you'd expect)
>most likely more cores than Intel at the same price points just like consumer Ryzen
If Skylake X can't reach high clocks like Kaby Lake it would be ripped to shreds.

>If Skylake X can't reach high clocks like Kaby Lake it would be ripped to shreds.
Well, it is called Threadripper.

Okay, now I wonder if AMD can create 32 core CPU.

Welcome to a year ago.

I guess it's just impossible to have a thread about AMD without a zillion retards and trolls shitting all over it. This is some amazing shit in the HEDT space and all we get is more dipshits over here. Neo Sup Forums is pure unbridled cancer.

t-thanks

Naples, yo. And AMD plans on cramming 2 of them into a single case. 64c/128t with an unholy fuckton of I/O anyone?

A year ago? 32 core Zen leaks first came up in 2014 I believe.
>yfw Intel had 3 years of warning that AMD was making a 32 core MCM CPU and yet they still were't prepared at all for it.

And if the rumors are correct, even with the server Skylake chips they wont be able to properly respond due to heat, costs, and terribad yields due to Intel's fetish with fuckhuge monolithic server dies.

Meanwhile AMD can take 4 much smaller and cheaper Ryzen dies, slap them into a single package, and sell that as Naples at profit. Bonus on top of that is that since AMD's CPU and APU lines are all likely going to be derived from 1 die each, they don't have to spend nowhere near as much on developing the masks and whatnot for other dies (so 2 total not counting dGPU dies). AMD has a huge advantage here in terms of manufacturing the chips.

Skylake-X should clock higher than Kabylake with solder. It's still the same core.