Good god such low base clocks for the 10 core, that leaked ES 16 core is 3.1GHz and that's still not even a QS

Good god such low base clocks for the 10 core, that leaked ES 16 core is 3.1GHz and that's still not even a QS

Other urls found in this thread:

wccftech.com/intel-coffee-lake-desktop-6-core-4-core-cpu-leaked/
wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-16-12-core-x399-whitehaven-cpus-leaked/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Core i9-7820X
>28 PCIe Lanes
This is painfully disappointing. Fucking 8C CPU and it still has so few PCIe lanes? I didn't buy Ryzen and it looks like I'm not buying this shit either, since the 10C model will likely go for $1000+ and I'm not paying that much.

It's just abortion Xeon chips, there are Skylake Xeons with 12 cores at 3.6GHz base
Though probably 180W TDP

>Core i9

I'll believe it when I see it. Intel has never used "i9" for anything so this is probably just made-up bullshit on a random forum post.

Not that SLI/Crossfire is something that should be recommended, it'd still be nice to have the option of 2 cards at a full 16x without dropping over $1000 for a 10C/20T monster CPU. Seems like a step backwards from even the 6850k.

Skylake-EP goes up to 205W so they can go crazy on clocks.

>Seems like a step backwards from even the 6850k.
It is, unless they're somehow pricing that 10C CPU at 6850k levels, which will never happen.

Fuck, if these are the clocks on the "Enthusiast" 6+ cores, what are they going to look like on the consumer Coffee Lake-S? Probably like dogshit.

Looks interesting but I'm not seeing the benefit of cutting the L3 cache to one third and replacing it with L2 since the L2 isn't shared

>Core i7-7640K
>4C/4T
>on a HEDT platform
This chip deserves to be the butt of all jokes for years to come.

Gimped i7 on HEDT, thank you Intel you are truly our greatest ally.

M O A R C O A R Z
O
A
R

C
O
A
R
Z

Core i9-7900X = $1000
Core i9-7820X = $800
Core i9-7800X = $600

In a few hundred years someone will optimize software for 1mb L2.

No major benefit, large pools of shared L3 weren't producing good yields.
There would be a benefit if applications take advantage of the 1MB L2, but everything in the last 10 years+ has been centered around 256KB L2 that's a far way from happening

>Core i7-8700K - $400

>205W
Jesus christ, even Naples isn't going over 180W and that's 32 cores at around 2.7-2.9GHz clocks

The consumer platform always had higher clocks than HEDT though.

IT'S NOT FAIR

Isn't that because HEDT platforms had moar coars? Coffee Lake-S is 6 cores mainstream for the first time.

Unless the all core turbos are a good 600MHz over their base clocks, which is a good fucking joke as Intel's TDP is based on their base clock, I don't see how these will be a good buy unless they're $300-700

7820X Would need to cost under $600 to compete with the r7

Because 4 core limit, Coffelake-S is 6 cores mainstream and that platform needs to be under 95W

Can you imagine how low the clocks will be?
We already got sisoft leaks of the 6 core at 3.5GHz, that's a fucking QS

>Intel
>Competing on price

>4.5 ghz 6c/12t with kabylake IPC
If they sell this anywhere near 1600x prices Ryzen is dead

Yes, in fact let's link it wccftech.com/intel-coffee-lake-desktop-6-core-4-core-cpu-leaked/

Nvm read that wrong, only 4 ghz on the 6c wtf

Ryzen has higher IPC though.

> - 112W for Kaby Lake-X / up to 160W for Skylake-X
>up to 160W

Haha oh wow, all their previous HEDT was 140W
They're literally trying to push with more power usage.

n e t b u r s t

Literally D O A housefires.

>up to 160W
Should have gone with 200W, Intel, you might have gotten 100MHz more out of that turbo clock.
Lmao

I wonder how high will AMD's HEDT shit clock.

>he doesn't understand how turbo works

Not only did you read it wrong, but the idea Intel would sell their shiny new 6 cores for that much less than their old 4 cores is ridiculous. They never lower their goddamn prices.

There are talks they want to get the 16 core to 3.6 base clocks.
They'll probably hit 3.5GHz at best, which is still amazing.

Leaky leaks wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-16-12-core-x399-whitehaven-cpus-leaked/

That and 64 PCI-E lanes means that Skylake-X is DOA.

I imagine it would have to be more expensive than a 7700k, but not by alot, else people will just go for Ryzen

Shouldn't be a problem. They just need two Ryzen does that will hit the desired clocks to stick on an interposer, really. The bigger issue is the motherboard's power delivery and cooling.

>64 PCI-E
That's free PCIe lanes, once the mobo takes its share of M2/U2/SATA/whatever you'll be left with 52+

well there goes any hope for AMD ;_;

I expect the i7-8700K 6 core to sell for $375-$400.

Still more lanes and more coarz than SKL-X.

so i9 is a xeon replacement? are they just a plethora of bins now?

Then the question will be, does it OC past 4.5 ghz?

Judging by the boosts on the larger chips, it will.

If it does it might be worth that kind of cash.

Are you ready to delid & watercool it?

Delid yes, watercool no, proper aircooling will suffice for a delidded chip

not when it's in 300w range at those clocks.

No, you'll need to watercool it, see Broadwell-E.

I doubt they're real
If they are, 100% chance its a way to offload a bazillion gimped xeon chips

I will wait for the actual benchmarks to see if that is true

>does it OC past 4.5 ghz?
You're just praying you win the silicon lottery at that point.

It's 6 core Intel chip. It's HOT. It has less L3 cache than its HEDT brothers so it'll be slower. tl;dr get 1600 and stop being a faggot.

He should be praying his mobo can handle 300W from the socket and that magic smoke doesn't appear.

What the FUCK, are you kidding me? They completely gimped the 6850k and 6900k equivalents with this 28 PCIe lane bullshit. Now I would have to splurge for a 10-core chip to get more lanes than that, and what are the chances that shit is below $800?

AMD better deliver with their HEDT shit, goddamn I'm disappointed.

a 1600 would be a significant drop in core speed for me, and literally be a sidegrade at most.

I need a cpu with at least 4.5 ghz on the clock or it's not worth upgrading

Since they are releasing the larger chips with a 4.5 ghz boost out of the box, the 6c one will hit it even more easily

Or you wait for Pinnacle Ridge with actual IPC improvements instead of moarghz housefires?

Or I wait for actual benchmarks instead of dank memes

>implying it's not another set of damage control housefires
Healthy kek.

ok kid

What memes? Pinnacle ridge or Skylake-X which is at higher TDP than Broadwell-E was?

You're hoping for too much out of a binned to shit consumer 6 core CPU.

>6 core Intel chip
>$400
>R5 1600
>$219

lol, the 1800X beats even Intel's 10 core CPU

We shall see

J U S T krzanich my shit up please!

I'm disappointed too, but I highly doubt a 12C AMD chip is going to end up less than the $700-800 area, considering how their top 8C ends up at $500 already.

IT'S NOT FAIR AMDBROS

...

FUCK YOU AMD FOR PUSHING THIS MORE CORES MEME. GOD FUCKING DAMN IT. I'M DONE WITH ALL THESE INFINITE CORES AND SHIT. WHY DON'T PUSH SINGLE CORE PERFORMANCE. YOU PIECE OF SHIT FUCKING DAMN

They'll be segmented by clockspeed, you'll probably have a cheapo 12 core at $600 or less with lower clocks.

Fuck off Sup Forums

Quads of truth.

That's unattractive as well though, unless it can OC reliably, which isn't really what we've seen from Ryzen so far. I have no 12C workloads that I do frequently, getting something with low clocks wouldn't be very appealing.

>cheapo 12 core at $600 or less with lower clocks
SUPER ULTRA HYPER MEGA TASKING

Then why do you care about these chips? Get a quad core.

Too bad, because Intel's 12 cores will cost $1500 for 300 more MHz

I have a quad core, 6C or 8C would be useful to me, but 12C is likely going to push the clocks too low to be worth it unless the chip is amazing at OC with the proper cooling.

B-but more gihagurtz goyim. Buy our Genuine Intel processors.

>mfw it's already beginning

Confirmed.

These Ryzen chips are all the same die, all of them can OC to 4.0/4.1, overclocking 12 or even 16 cores to that would be insane performance.

Only issue is cooling.

>160W

Rofl

dumb karenshiiter

Intel becoming the new AMD

Is that 160? I can't read the blurry smeared text well enough.

16 cores at 3.9 would even be faster than the $7000 24 core Broadwell-E, which is some.. 2.3GHz?

Power usage aside.

...

>4c/4t
>112W

Intel should die in a fire together with their clinically retarded engineers.

Read the OP
- Dual DDR4-2666 for Kaby Lake-X / Quad DDR4-2666 for Skylake-X
- 112W for Kaby Lake-X / up to 160W for Skylake-X
- Apparently all Core i9 parts support AVX-512 (TBC)
- Launch in June, except 7920X (August)

This piece of shit company needs to be burnt to the ground

>4.3GHz all cores stock on 8C/10C chips
That's actually pretty impressive. The price is probably going to be ridiculous which will make them unappealing, a damn shame.

Yuo don't liek more ghz? You want longer bibelines?

In theory, 24core would win every time.

Chances are pretty high if they are doing overclocking tests of this garbage at their manufacturing plants.

>if you don't care about housefires, Intel has added Turbo Core 3.0 to our chips

In theory, but the clockspeed deficit is larger than the core deficit, and even in datacenter 50% more cores is not 50% more scaling.

High clocks aren't efficient though, so the 24 core clearly wins out at perf/watt

Isn't that 3.3 GHz base 4.3 GHz boost?
Will Coffee Lake-S get Turboboost 3.0? Or is that never showing up on consumer CPUs?

What exactly is turboboost 3.0? XFR: Intel edition?

All cores? Turbo boost has always been single core, all core will probably be +200MHz over base clock if that.