>2017
>JPEG still exist
2017
Jack Bailey
Adrian Cook
Until webp or something else can actually replace it, yeah. It'll never stop existing.
Ryan Turner
>it hasn't even been replaced by JPEG2000
Jayden Campbell
>tfw autism would require me to convert all my jpg images into webp if it took off
Elijah Cooper
webm is better than jpeg and has better compression
Christian Morgan
Cool. Good thing we need less compression for high quality images. Also, if it wasn't obvious we need a solution for images. Not webms. Which are for movies. Which are designed to be web friendly. Designed to reduce quality in favor of more space and longer videos.
GG at trying though?
Nathaniel Jenkins
It works great. why replace it? new shit saves only few percent anyway and is incompatible with everything.
Julian Mitchell
I know right, it's like an undead faggot that just won't finally go burn in hell for all eternity like it should.
Ethan Brown
...
Brayden Wood
>tried WebP
>shitty banding even at high quality settings
>tried BPG
>no proper image viewer decoder any fucking were
>no nomochrome support.
>tried JPEG2000 and JPEGXR
>worse than WebP
Feels sad. So much investment of Google on a new format and they can't even use VP9 or 10 for encoding and fix the awful banding artifacts. Fuck this shit.