- L2 cache = 1MB (Skylake-X), 4x as much as Core i7-7700K - Dual DDR4-2666 for Kaby Lake-X / Quad DDR4-2666 for Skylake-X - 112W for Kaby Lake-X / up to 140W for Skylake-X - Apparently all Core i9 parts support AVX-512 (TBC) - Launch in June, except 7920X (August)
Will be priced too high as usual. I'm not gonna pay $400+ for a 6 core i9.
My 2600k will keep on kicking for the meantime
Jeremiah Carter
>i7 quad core
Landon Jones
$400 is not too bad for a 6c/12t user.
4c/8t 6700k and 7700k are about $330.
Also Jewtel needs to stop being fags and allow more than 4 cores on a Z series mobo.
Jack Sanchez
That part confuses me. Who buys a 4core 4 thread in 2017?
Lucas Lopez
Tom's Hardware
Jonathan Wilson
I'm hoping the 7820k is MSRP in the 450 area. As long as it released on launch for under 550 I'll buy it. I believe it'll be cheaper though because of the addition of other models as well as the fact that they basically switched the i7 to encompass 6c. And all HEDT CPUs with more than 6c will have their own price points. The 5820k was roughly in the same price bracket in the Uber expensive launch season then fall to normal price of around 380.
I will be pissed and fucked if the 7820k is above 570$ though.
Adam Rivera
intel is
FINISHED INISHED NISHED ISHED SHED HED ED D
Andrew Cruz
Sorry I lied. The first article I read a few days ago had showed the 7800k as an i7 model, which I believed considering the increased popularity over moar cores.
Hudson Murphy
Can someone recommend me a good motherboard for these
Samuel Adams
It's supposedly a new LGA slot so the mobos aren't out yet.
Why can't Jewtel just keep one fucking LGA standard for all high performance and consumer CPUs?
Parker Ortiz
...
Juan Wright
Fee Fie Fo Fum I smell shit in Intel's pants
Blake Hughes
Faggots that only game. And don't understand what stutter is. Dunno how to 'fix' /pcbg/ recommendations without some autist sperging max frames, shitting up the thread for a week straight.
Robert Allen
POOTEL DUCKTAPED HOUSEFIRES
Hunter Bell
>So anyone want to take a stab at prices for the i9 series from Intel?
They're going to lose a lot of customers to Threadripper/Whitehaven regardless, but I would guess $1,000 for the 10-core i9 is the absolute max they can get away with.
Robert Rivera
Does this mean i5/i7 will be cheaper? Sounds good to me.
Tyler Perez
A socket change a year keeps the goyim in fear
Ian Foster
ahh-h-heh just you Wait(tm) AMDrones!
Owen Morales
I here ya. My W5580 is still doing what I need it to. And I can always throw in a 6-core from eBay if I wanted.
Ayden Gray
Hey, Ryzen is pretty gud. What should we do? Add more cores :DDDD :D Ebin
Thomas Peterson
inb4 it's still $1500 and the 12 core is $2000
Caleb Hernandez
Hahaha. Their mainstream i7-8700K 6 core is going to be $375-$400. No way they're selling a 6 core for the same as their old 4 core. The "enthusiast" 6 core version is going to be way more expensive.
Austin Moore
I mean, it is Intel we're talking about...
Angel King
AMD is doing a 16c, did you know that? Hypocrite.
Angel Collins
Literally a rebranded i7
Xavier Roberts
Sorry user but is most likely correct.
Intel's current ten-core lineup are two broadwell based xeons.
If they can get away with charging $7000 for the one with half decent clockspeed then you can sure as hell expect to pay at least $1499.99 for the ten core "prosumer" and closer to $2199.99 for the twelve core "prosumer".
Caleb Campbell
Doesn't matter. Ryzen 9 will provide more cores at similar clock speeds and lower power draw for less money.
Jack Davis
>$400 is not too bad for a 6c/12t >you can literally get that from AMD for half that price Wow, you guys are cucked beyond belief.
Kayden Powell
They'll price it on par with the 1800X, and then tom's will review in games using 4 cores max on a 1080ti with turbo3.0 tweaked and say it's AMAZING and has a huge ipc just 6 cores are better than 8.
Elijah Turner
gotdamn muh dick
Daniel Hughes
>$1,000 for the 10-core Lol, they're already charging that much for an 8-core i7.
Jason Lee
stutter meme is a spook. AMDrones can't come up with conclusive proof
Evan Murphy
Other than the fact that Intel consistently scores lower minimum frame rates while scoring higher average frame rates?
Oliver Roberts
>ark.intel.com/compare/93814,93795 Xeon E7 is for quad socket servers, that's why it's so expensive. Look at E5 W xeons, those are for single socket workstations.
Adrian Cox
video proof
Jayden Hernandez
I know, but it has been suggested that with the addition of the 12-core and competition from AMD, everything in the Skylake-X lineup might move down a rung in price. Probably just wishful thinking.
At least there will be a viable alternative.
Benjamin Foster
intel is fucked
they just can't match ryzen prices because it would mean they have been fucking their consumers for years, but if they don't lower their prices, nobody would buy their shit and people would go amd.
sure there will be kids with rich parents that will buy at any price, also the overclock kids that go full autism on benchmarks.
And cut in on their margins? I seriously doubt it. Even if they did manage to keep AMD out of these markets with those kinds of moves they wouldn't be able to keep charging these ridiculous prices. This is a lose-lose for Intel, and this is the result of actual competition.
They're the dipshits that got death threats from AMD fans for their Ryzen review...
Nolan Wilson
did they press charges?
John Wright
AMD are computer enthusiasts. Not slack jaw merchant lackeys. I'm sure if charges were pressed they would lead to dead ends, effectively dropping charges.
Hunter Wright
GAYMEN FAGGOTS GET OF MY BOARD
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Levi Sullivan
OH VEY!
Aaron Hernandez
pls no bully
Brayden Taylor
>Ryzen 14 and 10 cores Extreme Doubt CCXs need to be even
Gavin Jones
Fair enough, but lets now compare the highest end E5-2xxx chip and the 6950x (which looks like they're based off the same die from the specs):
Consumers pay an 80% premium for a higher clockspeed but higher TDP, and faster memory support but less quantity supported.
Thus, once again I would estimate $1499.99 as a minimum starting price for the i9-7900x. To be honest the closer I look at it I might be more comfortable pricing it event higher, say $1750 and up.
Then for the i9-7920x I would move that price up to $2499.99.
Robert Watson
Meh tier unless the 7820X OCs well.
I thought Intel was taking Ryzen seriously, this is weaksauce.
Jose Rodriguez
Didn't they get the threats because they bragged on a live stream about how they ran other programs while benching Ryzen to get lower results.
Ian Miller
They deserve death for that.
Ian Gutierrez
The single threat they showed off was telling them to get cancer
Connor Clark
They can't match AMD prices because then they'll have some serious fucking explaining to do to their enterprise customers. They'll either need to bullshit like no one ever has before, or ALSO lower prices in their most lucrative market.
Thomas Richardson
They can't match prices because AMD is stringing together smaller dies to make larger ones.
Intel can have a 28 core monolithic 700mm2 range die all they want. All AMD has to do is paste four 195mm2 dies together and call it a day. All while getting better performance scaling than a ring bus, at a cost exponentially lower, as price per chip rises extremely rapidly as area increases.
Easton Myers
Oh look, another socket.
Adam Turner
lel AMD won this gen and probably many more They fucking did it guys
Josiah Barnes
I'm betting $700 starting point
Noah Powell
$399 price point
-t.Intel employee
John Taylor
>throw two i7s in one package >NEW i9 DON'T LOOK OVER THERE AT THAT CHEAPER FASTER AMD PART
Jack Carter
>tfw you live long enough to see AMD survive Bulldozer and come back on top
Feels good.
Xavier Ross
>Intel is now the wait and more cores company I want off mr. trump's wild timeline
Jeremiah Morales
Maybe for the 7640K
Austin Smith
Where the fuck are my next gen, low energy processors??
Jacob Powell
This is now a Sup Forums related nostalgia thread. Post nostalgic images.
I'll start.
Luis Johnson
...
Christian Kelly
They're here, and they're red
Asher Bailey
>meanwhile a Ryzen 9 will be like 5% slower for half the cost yet people will bitch about how shit it is for not being 50% faster than Intel for half the cost
Currently on a 4770K, will probably upgrade when the new chips drop and we get concrete price and performance data
Jace Morris
In smartphones. Dock and you can use desktop keyboard, monitor and mouse.
Jason Williams
If it were a level playing field and vendors were allowed to ship AMD without penalty from the monopolists, the world would be a better place.
Camden Cooper
Kek.
Isaac Evans
>5% slower
Yeah, slower at artificial benchmarks optimized for Intel.
Tyler Flores
>2013 14nm >2015 10nm Man they really lost the plot, Q4 2017 for 10nm laptop, 2019 for 10nm desktop
Daniel Scott
But Ryzen was the opposite. It did better in synthetics but was a little bit slower in real world scenarios (granted mostly games, in productivity and actual work they are very good)
Owen Robinson
And we got 14nm in fucking 2016, three years late
Mason Hill
Didn't they recently proclaim that tick-tock is dead? Then AMD comes along and kicks their ass at IPC and process. Pretty funny, Intel deserves to get their ass kicked for sitting on that overpriced trash for so long.
AMD must be getting some good coin from the consoles to put into R'D.
Andrew Lewis
2015
Zachary Mitchell
Bruh, AMD's 8-cores come close to beating Intel's 10-core HEDT processor. That 16-core beast is going to rip Intel a new asshole.
Lucas Powell
Laptops don't count for anything, they're mainly just proof of concepts that get 20 min better battery life and nothing else of importance.
Owen Hill
They went to tick-tick-tock a few years back
Elijah Hill
>Bruh, AMD's 8-cores come close to beating Intel's 10-core HEDT processor Not in multitasking. It should come close in single threaded tasks because it's newer
Brayden Cruz
They went to kick-cuck process.
Dominic Turner
>Core i9
Is this a joke? There was never supposed to be an "i9", retards have been talking about such a thing ever since the i3/5/7 debut, but it was just babble. The i7 is the top line of Intel CPUs, "i9" just doesn't make any sense.
Cameron Jackson
Kek. They aren't even following their replacement anymore.
Jacob Wood
It's 2017. All the memes are becoming real.
Isaiah Roberts
Welcome to the chaos timeline
Jackson Foster
It beats Intel's HEDT in single threaded applications. It matches or beats the 6900k in pretty much every multithreaded task. AMD's 16-core processors are going to wreck everything Intel has on offer for people who actually buy that kind of shit.
Kayden Carter
5775C was a thing
No one bought it and it was hardly manufactured but it was a thing
It's called Process (Broadkek) Architecture (Skylel) Optimization (Babylake)
then they were gonna have Cannonlake be the new Process cycle, followed by Icelake then Tigerlake.
But then they fucked up their 10nm process, and the desktop Cannonlakes got cancelled like Broadwell. So they introduced Coffeelake on 14nm which they claim will have "Cannonlake technology", despite Cannonlake being just a Skylake die shrink from the beginning. Then the server chips got cancelled too, so it's up in the air what happens after Skylake-E. Intel might not introduce a new server chip line until late 2019 / early 2020 which would absolutely decimate them. Or they could do something like Kabylake-E or Coffeelake-E, but they're out of die space on 14nm already so it would only be a trivial clock bump which would piss off server companies anyways.
Juan Flores
>5775C was a thing Oh shit you're right, lel I totally forgot about it.
Noah Morales
They are pulling the "hurr, muh i9 nao" card in response to Ryzen, just as they pulled the P4EE card in response to the Athlon64 14 years ago.
welcome to the Ryzen effect - releasing a Pentium with HT - releasing an unlocked i3 - moving Skylake-X and Cannonlake forward - adding more megaherz and more cores at housefire wattages - releasing a 4c/4t i7
intel probably wanted to use a new name for the top line of processors since Ryzen did beat (sometimes) the i7.
Matthew Campbell
Skylake-E wasn't moved forwards, they actually intended to launch it in early January. Last minute (as in a week or two before it shipped) they discovered serious bugs in the AVX-512 implementation and xpoint compatibility issues. So they shipped off their production lot up until then to Google and Amazon exclusively and delayed Skylake-E by six months for every other consumer.
Cannonlake they did move up though, by, what do you know, skimping on bugtesting.
Why the fuck was it called "NetBurst" anyway? It had literally fuck-all to do with networking specifically. Or was it just marketeers that came up with that term because everyone's priority was connecting to the internet back then? Pretty much the same can be said of MS "dotNET" btw, what does it have to do with "net"?
Matthew Johnson
They have kept the "i9" label in reserve for emergency situations, just as a combat jet pilot has an afterburner available to use if necessary.
Austin Ramirez
You pretty much answered your own question, user. Engineers make the technology, then execs, marketeers and salesmen come up with a retarded name that they believe will sell the product in the current market situation, and slap it onto it.
Kevin Moore
Actual internal codename for the arch was P68
Angel Gray
Will those 12 cores AMDs be launched on a different board than X370? I wonder if I should get those instead of a 1700.
