Firecucks

Why is Mobzilla Fingerblaster trying to push political agendas? Why are technology compenies so enthralled by politics today?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mnNSe5XYp6E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

because an open internet with free communication between users and the ability for anyone to make a website is kinda important for a search engine.

They got BTFO on the technology side, so now they have to pretend they're still relevant as some sort of internet activism group

> why do car companies have an interest in safety and emission standards?
> why do lawyers have an interest in legal proceedings?
> why do web app developers have an interest in the web?

Hmm..

nice leddit image

inb4 another Sup Forums thread

>why do people only get upset about companies being political when it goes against the positions of Trump?

this makes absolutely no sense. kys

The only thing net neutrality will do is to make sure that if you have a data cap you can't get any additional services that don't count under the cap like free netflix or youtube or whatever.

>He doesnt think like us? homophobic homophobic!! racist, bigot, Sup Forums, fascist

Always using fucking buzzwords to control uh? now you sperg your bullshit, then run making everyone lose time

and because there is a topic about politics and technology it doesnt become automatically Sup Forums

GTFO

>ISP starts charging extra for non-kosher traffic
>new ISPs start on the basis of providing data-neutral traffic
>old ISPs go bankrupt

oh look the free market solved everything again

the only reason i still use firecuck is because i hate google shit and some addons doesnt work on opera

Wow. Hit a nerve there, didn't he user. You sure seem invested in defending against his point, I wonder why.

It was a fucking Sup Forums thread from the start

>Why do they disagree with our lord and savior Trump fucking burn REEEEEEE

>New ISP doesn't do that because they can get away with not doing it
>Most of the ISPs get bought out by a single company
Yeah, the invisible hand of the free market will solve everything

Ok then you can fuck off thanks

>new ISPs get bought out, or bullied out of business with legislation because the government doesn't want the internet to be free either

>new isp
>in 'murica
oh im laffin

>why does company x not agree with me politically!!!!!!!1!!!
Sup Forums
>why does company x (who provide a technology related service) not agree with me politically!!!!!!!1!!!
Sup Forums

Forgive me for not seeing the fucking logic here. You have your board for political discussion and it's over fucking there

Because there cant be a topic about technology AND politics, take you weak bait argument somewhere else retard

we would have much better software if these faggots spent all the time that they use to post gender memes on fixing bugs and adding features instead.

>having data caps at all
fucking burgers

it's sad so many moderate liberals push for something the fringe knows will end free speech for the right

Why are Sup Forumsfags against net neutrality anyways, shouldn't they protect the law that allows equal access to all sites including their shitty nazi larping blogs?

Who are you quoting?

because rhetoric and what it actually entails are two different things. Why do liberals support government overreach when they have the worst history of censorship of the internet?

I'm pretty sure that the copyright lobby and tech giants are the pioneers of internet censorship. Infrastructure should be controlled by the government not some shekel hungry kikes.

if you mean tech giants like google and facebook who support net neutrality you would be right

it must suck to be retarded, keep trying maybe you'll find someone to call a cuck or something, that'll probably make you happy until mom calls you in for lunch time.

People have been passionate about net neutrality since you were a sperm bouncing around in your dad's wrinkly ballsack junior, no need to get frazzled because you're too young to understand the argument.

Someone convinced these jackasses that net neutrality is bad for some undetermined reason, I'm guessing they just like to be contrarian assholes like they do with everything else. Whatever, I hope their parents have fun paying an extra $100 so they can e-LARP on their favorite sites.

(((Open source))) is just more degeneracy the (((communists))) have created. Open source is anti white.

that's some stretch-armstrong level reaching you're doing there Opie

Daddy trump is against net neutrality so Sup Forumscucks have to gargle down his zionist cock like good goys.

I don't understand why anyone who isn't looking to screw the consumer would be against net neutrality. It basically says packets are packets, and should all be treated the same. You can't slow them down or block them based on origin, destination, or content. It keeps the internet a level playing field, instead of being biased towards the interests of the few large ISPs that dominate 99% of America.

Because they don't have a real opinion on the matter.

They will support whatever decision Trump makes even if it goes against their interests or beliefs because they convinced themselves that not supporting him makes them a liberal transgender "cuck"; whatever that means.

...

>willingly discarding your freedoms because some germaboo luddite told you free software is communism
good goy

Because it's more government regulation which libertarians don't like. Also I guess it can fuck up new ISPs because they don't have enough bandwidth to service everyone who's trying to see the new trending video on Youtube but they can't do anything to shape the traffic.

Except net neutrality is Sup Forums related too.

Nu-Sup Forums would cheer on trump making anti-semitism a crime if trump did it because something something 1488D chess.

>New ISP

Are you retarded? ISP do not share cables,nor utility poles

nice fucking false flag, now install me Temple OS goyim

>trying to imply that all packets are not equal
>trying to artificially hamper technology
Ludditism is not Sup Forums related.

>thinks it's impossible for new ISPs to form

Nice try kike, I'm not going to work for free with (((free software))).

Didn't mozilla fire it's CEO for donating to a anti-gay organization? Didn't realize that was linked to Trump

Not impossible in theory, but extremely unlikely and impractical. The amount of money it would cost to run the new infrastructure would raise the cost of entry so high that it would take decades to turn a profit.

>10 rupees have been deposited into your account

The is still in charge or what happened later? i don't remember

>if you heart
>heart
Man, i sure miss those times when normies didnt even know what internet was

Keep promoting free software with your bullshit.

>10 shekels have been deposited into your account

Sup Forums fag here, we aren't, where did you get the idea?

>the only thing
what did he mean by this
inb4 "muh free market"

Obama already let it do for users it's usually unnoticed.

>If you heart
fuck you. luckily no one has to see that page more than once.

Only burgers see it or at least i have never saw it.

...

Can /leftypol/ make a single original meme?

It wasn't related to Trump. They're just scumbags. Eich is working on Brave, which is decent.

I know I am making the "Sup Forums is one person" fallacy, but it seems to me that mostly right-wingers from Sup Forums are against net neutrality, especially in this thread. I'd think that nat-soc folks shouldn't be against net neutrality, right? Last time I checked they were against corporate kikes judging which network packets should have (((special))) treatment. I'm hoping that it's just the lolbertarians shitposting here.

Natsocs are commies by another name.

They're torn between their hatred for jewish corporations and increased government reach.

Sup Forums is made up of natsoc, libertarians and ancaps, and traditional conservatives. The libertarian/ancap crowd is against net neutrality like any regulation that could allow the gooberment to overreach, but they also forget that small government is currently blocking regional competition and most towns in American only have one cable provider.

NN wouldn't need to exist if only allowing one ISP and one cable company in a city or town was illegal.

so does pol support it or not I need to know this decide my stance on the issue

>data caps
Stop living in a nigger country

(((They))) do allow more than one comapny. By which I mean those jews in municipal government don't hard block late comers, they just enforce high costs and restrictive regulations when a company wants to lay lines in the ground or use existing public utility. Google fiber broke into certain locations just by paying out the ass, though some cities actually invited Google in because they smelled the opportunity of gentrification.

Some cities do have laws only allowing one cable and one ISP because of special deals.

Even the botnet is better at this point.

>net neutrality is like the 1st Amendment
>We made our incredibly talented CEO quit his job because he exercised his 1st Amendment right and we didn't like it
I hope the internet gets destroyed and then the sun explodes..

Are you fucking retarded?

... That's not how it works.

It means that ISPs won't be able to sell your internet history (hint: this is bad). It means that ISPs won't be able to charge content hosts and creators THAT YOU LIKE (read: Netflix etc) an additional fee (disguised under whatever pretense) to keep bandwidth to their servers prioritised rather than their rival's. And make no mistake, this 'fee' WILL GET PASSED ONTO YOU. Leaving only your ISP's pockets richer. That's just a hint of the shenanigans that neutrality helps to ward off.

this is why there are people against net neutrality
the brainwashing is more than skin deep.

>heart this, heart that
What is this, 2009?

I'm no Sup Forums but when I see multinational corporations with a huge rapsheet on tax evasion, antitrust law violations, ties with governments and corrupt fake news mainstream media and multiple instances of bad security and badly written proprietary software like apple, microsoft, google, facebook, twitter, etc support something (in this case "net neutrality") I'm automatically sceptical against it.

The point being I'm not going to defend their position and become a pawn in their schemes. For me and the people to win they have to loose.

Fuck them, they already have their greedy claws inside the corrupts governments and intergovernmental organizations anyway, I'm not going to provide them with an alibi to step on my rights. I don't support globalism

Fuck the new mozilla

firefox is not a search engine dingus

>not supporting net neutrality
[muffled hand-rubbing in the distance]

Mozilla has always been using their free soapbox to bring attention to privacy concerns, Firefox was designed as a browser for the privacy concerned and Thunderbird/Sunbird were designed as a mail client and calendar for the privacy concerned.

Good goy detected

>What are cartels?
If you can't identify the de facto monopolies you're a dumb bitch.

Fuck net neutrality

If "web design" wasn't the javascript powered bloated mess that it is we wouldn't need net neutrality and data caps because web pages wouldn't need 50MB of random ever changing libraries to display a paragraph of text

Screw net neutrality. Net neutrality ends up supporting the current sorry state of "web design" because there is no incentive for light weight web sites

Web pages aren't the problem user, it's video streaming. More specifically, ISPs (who also sell you video content) don't want to put the money into improving their networks just to help Netflix and friends.

Gotta love it when I visit a mainstream website and noscript brings up a list with a scrollbar

Internet is infrastructure. You cannot have functional deregulated infrastructure.
Only stupid people think the internet can work without net neutrality. ISP are constantly trying to give you less than you paid for and they WILL abuse an unregulated internet the moment they are allowed to.

Net neutrality is the result of "copyright" laws
>100 users on an isp want to watch a shitty movie
>100 users should redownload the shitty drm encrypted movie from netflix
>hur-dur-dur, we need net neutrality because piracy is bad, okay?

Without "copyright" laws
>100 users on an isp want to watch a shitty movie
>1 users downloads it and uploads it to his ftp server
>"hey guys, I downloaded a shitty movie, do you want to grab it from ftp?"
>only one copy of the shitty movie gets downloaded, the channel remains free for communication and research

Delete "copyright" and we don't need net neutrality

but mu-h shekels goyim!!!!!

>Because it's more government regulation
NO. It's not MORE. It's exactly the same it is right now.

>Also I guess it can fuck up new ISPs
There will be no new ISP because deregulated internet allows existing big players to strongarm the shit out of any small competition.

>oh, what a nice cheap you have there. let me offer this service to your customers FOR FREE

You can earn shekels by
>cinema tickets
>physical media sales

Once someone buys your shitty movie it belongs to him and can freely create file copies and redistribute it freely

You are already filthy rich from cinema tickets. Fuck off.

>but I can't pay the overrated meme actors
>b-but I will go out of business!
Good riddance

>Net neutrality is the result of "copyright" laws
This is probably the dumbest thing I read on Sup Forums today.

because modern day political ideologies are basically massive cults for the nigger cattle

youtube.com/watch?v=mnNSe5XYp6E

...

who ever controls the media, controls the mind.

It sort of works if you replace cult with google.
It doesn't work if you replace cult with conservatism or socialism the free software movement.

how are your data cap, burgers?

feels so good living in a country with hundreds of independent ISPs, no data caps and eu laws protecting my net neutrality.

sent from my unlimited gigabit connection for 25€. keep on being cucked.

>Why are technology compenies so enthralled by politics today?
Maybe because it's directly related to what they do, dingus.
Specially considering it's an open source project.

>another thread derailed by leftist schmucks
Can y'all just stay on topic for one God damn minute? I don't like veiled Sup Forumsposting either but y'all get fuckin rowdy the moment you spot a political trigger word.

desu, looking at what he is doing now, it was for the better. otherwise firefox would now be riddled with ads so that (((eich))) can profit from it.

Hey look at this guy.
He thinks that he can speak for over 500000 people, when it shows a lot of them are butt blasted about this topic.
Hey guy, fuck you.

Who gives a fuck about your politics you tard.
Fuck off.