AHHAHAHHAHAHHAAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHHHHHAHHAAHHHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHHAAHAHHH

AHHAHAHHAHAHHAAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHHHHHAHHAAHHHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHHAAHAHHH

Other urls found in this thread:

pcper.com/reviews/Processors/Ryzen-Memory-Latencys-Impact-Weak-1080p-Gaming
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

sir please do the needful and delet

Are we going to do this now? Link some benchmark about some obscure software or game and post to prove amd or intel superiority?

What am I looking at?

Oh wow kikes in full damage control mode due to EPYC.

the desperation of intel fags

Oh wow testing memory and set one command rate 1 and other to 2. How the fuck is that supposed to be in any way comparable?

>needing damage control for something literally, unironically named "EPYC"
LOL

>set one command rate 1 and other to 2
wrong retard. The only difference is the CPU

It will unironically bury Xeons just like Opterons buried EPIC. :^)

Check again 7700K is running command rate 2 and 1800X is running command rate 1. Are you fucking blind? I bet you don't even know that command rate is.

Are you
retarded?

>2T vs 1T
really gets the ol' noggin joggin'

they might be testing both chips with optimal settings.

That's what the CPU defaults to retards. If there was some magic performance improvement AMD wouldn't default to 1

Are you
really that retarded?

If anything CM1 is faster than CM2. AMD BTFO AGAIN

>today on "a bunch of meaningless numbers"

>the state of AMD argumentation

Here's the article this is from. pcper.com/reviews/Processors/Ryzen-Memory-Latencys-Impact-Weak-1080p-Gaming

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH

Wow, just wow, are AMDfags really so desperate they want to post this shit?

>pcper
Kikes are not even fucking trying anymore.

FEAR THE FUCKING 128 PCI-E LANES KIKES. THE SHOAH IS COMING FOR YOU.

see

See

That's not an argument, that's just the same "j-j-just w-wait" we've heard from AMDrones for literally a decade now

>n-no not the datacenters
Into the oven you go.

It's still not out m8. It's still just another "just wait". Nothing you say changes that.

Also how pathetic are you that you care about some product you will never use just because it's made by some company you feel personally attached to?

Sisoft Sandra LATENCY test?
Shouldn't lower mean superior for this particular benchmark?

>a-another shoah
Oy-vey.

Nah m8, I'm doing good and I will buy high end vega without even looking at benchmarks exaclty like I did with ryzen.

Yes. Intel wins

>The Ryzen 7 1800X is slower in all three methods from Sandra, but is proportionally slower with the in-page result, coming in 3.6x slower than the Core i7-7700K. By comparison, under the full random scenario, the Ryzen 7 1800X is 56% slower. Even on the sequential test, the Ryzen part is 45% slower.By comparison, the Intel Memory Latency Checker puts the latency comparison somewhere in between SiSoft Sandra’s fully random and in-page result. The Ryzen 7 1800X reports roughly twice the latency (92% slower) of the 7700K.
Looks like lower is better

>being this much of a brandname consumerist drone
>>>/facebook/

sly

i'll keep the knowledge for myself tho, u ungrateful fucks

CM1 is fast enough that people will drop 200mhz+ on their memory OC for it

Will got one for half the price, don't be mad good goy.
I can get everything for half the price so Idgaf.
Once the new 16c/32t are out I might switch to that.
>mfw working at retailer.

HAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>axis unit not specified
trash.

Exactly, even more embarrasing for AYYMD

Does this matter at all? Serious answers only.

It's one of the reasons AMD suck in games since they are more latency sensitive than desktop programs

Why the hell is the results so different than the leaked benches? Like the 1700x should have been able to blow away the 7700k but now it's struggling as fuck?

>muh moar coars muh bigger numbers
Half of Sup Forums is literally at macbook girl-level

Guess who "leaked" the benches
Guess who will continue to "leak" benches as long as their drone fanbase pre-orders shit based on it

That's what server market wants. Muh more cores and bigger numbers, yes.

No, they want performance/W/$

Unless it's ML who want to strap as many GPUs per rack as possible. Also Zen delivers on perf/watt like nothing else.

Ryzen and Intel is actually neck and neck when it paired mid-range or low-range GPUs. Ryzen only lose sometimes when the GPU isn't the bottleneck. I don't see what the problem is here.

PcPer article suggests that with higher memory latency, software with high memory sensitivity would impact negatively on Ryzen.

>it's another cherry pick by AMD episode

How is this, cherry pick?

This is no surprise. AMD's memory controllers traditionally suck.

Yet AMD manages higher minimums.

What kind of crazy, wild magic did this dude do?

>1 single game
>doesn't even list hardware
>only avg FPS

The GPU is a GTX970, its an older benchmark and people already called them out for using a bottleneck. In the result where the GPU isn't a bottleneck the 7700k is roughly 30% faster.

It's another episode of Sup Forums tries to desperately hide inferno delidgate.

>posts another cherry pick
LOOOOL

Intelfags are in full desperation.

see

Leaked benches were dumb. Ryzenz with fast ram vs Intel's with slower ram. Main reason why I waited until after release to choose.

the benchmark he posted is in intel's favors though

How do you see thsi?

1080p result speak for themselves

Yea but look at the higher resolution. We also don't know the GPU.

Doesn't change that it's a cherry pic retard

the dude said it was a 970 so higher res isn't relevant honestly
so he was hidden intel shill false flagging all along
wew
but anyways any news on vega ?

Most are. It's because most games can't use more than 4 cores.

How is that not relevant? Most people don't even play in 1080p anymore. Upgrade your GPU then redo the benchmark this time the Intel will either only win by a little or lose.

>Most people don't even play in 1080p
ryzen is great but that's just false
i mean you up the res when you maxed out all the other option and that's not what was done here
i think we will have to see the next gen card to prove that ryzen was really future proof
well that's not really cherry picked then

So you're suggesting to push the bottleneck to the GPU instead of the CPU?

This is odd especially since new gpus are coming out soon. Also steam hardware survey shows most users play at 1080p.

Yes how is it fair to have a shitty GPU do the benchmark for CPU?

I think I am more shocked at how even handed this article dealt with the topic.

It's uncharacteristic of PCPer.

They did some testing with the latencies over at the Anandtech forums, the conclusion was that the latencies had to do with how the data went through the system. Something something data went back and forth between RAM and the CPU in an odd way causing the latency. The memory controller itself is actually pretty good. But I dont know too much honestly, check out the Ryzen Strictly Techninal thread.

higher is better, right?
Because it doesn't strain the components too much
AMD wins again

>Most people don't even play in 1080p anymore
Literally retarded

What are you willing to bet that's 1080p 60hz and not 1080p 144hz?

lower latency is better, too bad most of Sup Forums is one of two things: ironic trolls just shitposting as usual, or they're honestly too dumb to understand what latency is

anyway, intel wins again it seems

Not him but don't move the goalposts you cunt.

Gguyguguyguygyu

And yet the 1800x still beats the 6900k in the vast majority of use cases and beats the 7700k in virtually every use case other than 1080p gaming at ultra-high refresh rates.

Nope, all of those are multi threaded benchmarks. Ryzen is a 10/10 processor for a dedicated render PC or something like that. For everything else it's 6/10.

In real life the majority of programs you use (even the majority of tasks in multi threaded programs) are single thread and these reviews do a really poor job of showing you "real world performance". Mainly because they're too lazy to design their own test suite. Even really core applications like MS office are 90% single threaded

Well, except even most of the office, Photoshop, and other software benchmarks show the 1800x performing as I said above.

...

...

1080p is obsolete

>office
Like I said office is like 90% single threaded, you posted an extremely specific feature that 99.9% don't use. Even something as basic as sorting a list by value is single threaded in excel.
>Photoshop
Yes, Ryzen is good for PS
>software benchmarks
Did you not understand what I wrote? Most software benchmarks are not indicative of "real world performance" unless you render video all day.

>Did you not understand what I wrote? Most software benchmarks are not indicative of "real world performance" unless you render video all day.

Yes, I understand you are asserting an unfalsifiable claim sourced from your ass.

>unfalsifiable claim sourced from your ass.
We know Intel has better single core performance and AMD has better multi core
We know most tasks are single threaded, even in partially multi threaded programs

If this common knowledge is above you, you can both verify and potentially falsify this yourself with freely available CPU profiling tools.

>We know most tasks are single threaded, even in partially multi threaded programs
[Citation Needed]

>If this common knowledge is above you, you can both verify and potentially falsify this yourself with freely available CPU profiling tools.

This is such basic knowledge that I don't even know what to google.

Most single threaded programs that aren't games also run just fine on a 10 year old C2D or some shitty laptop i5, so testing single threaded performance in general isn't that interesting or relevant anymore these days.

>Most single threaded programs that aren't games also run just fine on a 10 year old C2D
Not really. There's a reason office computers often come with i7's or Xenons

Clearly you've seen the inside of an office.

Xeon you say? Whoops, looks like the 1800x BTFOs those too.

It's such common knowledge that you cannot find or produce a single shred of evidence to support the idea that there are a significant number of computationally intensive workloads that are predominantly single threaded.

>keeps posting multi threaded benchmarks
>ignores the single threaded results at the bottom which confirm what I'm saying

1. You can still easily verify it for yourself, if you care more about reality than your favorite brand
2. Try it yourself. Try finding a source of the distribution between single/multi threaded tasks for an average user

>synthetic benchmark
>different config

desperate

>different config
see

Feel free to post some actual evidence of computationally intensive workloads poorly threaded enough for single-core performance to dominate results.

Until then feel free to fuck right off, shekelchaser.