How fucked is the us?
How fucked is the rest of the world?
Net neutrality btfoed
Other urls found in this thread:
petitions.whitehouse.gov
arstechnica.com
independent.co.uk
fedex.com
twitter.com
FUCK this poo in the loo Pajeet curryfaggot. Cancel his H1B NOW.
Rest of the world is fine because rural Americans that can't afford the $300/month unrestricted internet plan with their one ISP will be restricted to Facebook.
F
...
>"""1st world""" country just got its internet cucked by a streetshitter
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Exclusive footage from the bathroom at FCC headquarters
The he has icons on his desktop thread is less annoying than this bullshit
By 2030, India will have better internet than the entire rest of the world.
Let's hope he doesn't get assassinated.
kek
...
FUCKING POOLOOS
FUCKING INDIANS
FUCK I'M MAD
Why does every fucking indian programmer that I meet only know Java or C#, and is wholly incurious about computing as a whole?
The same reason Sup Forums only know Rust, Haskell and Elixir and is wholly incurious about computing as a whole.
Some people ((pajeets)) are fucking disgusting
Whitehouse.gov petition to have Ajit Pai drink raw sewage
Pajeets always win, baby
>b-but it was supposed to be h-her turn
You libtards lost. Get over it. Your tears are so delicious
i feel sorry for the comcastcucks out there
LET it burn your freedom, just to make fun of muh libtards. You and other corporate cocksuckers are just geniuses.
You lost.
Thank god i'm not even a burger or "libtard", but good luck for paying even more for the shit from the verizon guy.
So explain why this matters?
The internet wasn't regulated by the government before
Why does it somehow need to be regulated now?
I realize small websites can be fucked over, but what stopped that from happening before the net neutrality laws?
>How fucked is the us?
Dunno.
>How fucked is the rest of the world?
Not in the slightest.
Good
There is no excuse for filling the Internet with stupid js libraries, viral videos and encrypted drm media
The death of net neutrality will be the catalyst to btfo corporations from the Internet
>I realize small websites can be fucked over, but what stopped that from happening before the net neutrality laws
The internet wasn't filled with corporate blood-sucking leeches and Net Neutrality rules were unwritten
You're dumb, corporations can afford to pay ISPs for fastlanes
only one going to get BTFO from the internet is your NEET ass, enjoy cuck
>Implying this only affects liberals
The internet was regulated, that's why ISPs aren't charging premiums for certain sites or blocking unpopular opinions
Dumb Americans sucking Trump's cock because of stupid Sup Forums memes. They will "like" anything he does because they don't want to make peace with the fact they were bamboozled.
Enjoy your 4 (8) years of declining America. I will be laughing at your from my comfortable European home.
>You libtards lost. Get over it. Your tears are so delicious
Trump and the republicans did indeed win. But internet is used by everyone. This is not a partisan issue.
It is a partisan issue for partisan hacks.
The internet is fucking done anyway for America. Its not like anything innovative is coming out of america. Not music, not tv, not movies, not books, not cars, not technology, not food, not the internet. I dont do shit on the web these days, just the same bullshit check reddif check Sup Forums check newspaper, porn. The rest of the world will continue to innovate but America's fate us idiocracy hell.
It is a partisan issue only if you insist on making it so.
>Letting this Poojeet shit on your streets
When will Burgers ever learn?
I'm sure Hillary would have done much better, after all, she did help pass Prism and Sopa.
I hope you are letting your wife/gf fuck muhammed.
I'm not from the US so this doesn't affect me but what exactly happened really? how does this affect them?
How dumb are you? I just told you I'm European, so why would I think Hillary is better? They're both garbage candidates
And yet, cuckolding fetish is most popular in America.
arstechnica.com
^Open comment period guide for these changes has opened until July 17.
>The NPRM also suggests that customers are being harmed by the ban on ISPs charging websites and other online services for faster access to consumers. "Is there a risk that banning paid prioritization suppresses pro-competitive activity?" the NPRM asks. "For example, could allowing paid prioritization give Internet service providers a supplemental revenue stream that would enable them to offer lower-priced broadband Internet access service to end-users?"
The level of motivated reasoning displayed here in order to justify unrestricted monopoly power is disgusting.
Basically ISPs just got full monopoly on the Internet. They can throttle websites selectively and sell data on their costumers.
See also inverse totalitarianism.
is bernie pro net neutrality?
Of course. He's not a moron.
t. poojet
It also has very little to do with the current party.
Who owns the internet? The answer is, certainly not USA. But Then why are they trying to take control over it? Who give them the right to do it.
ISP's can do whatever they want on their networks tb.h
Only if there is a contract(ToS) you sign, which states that ISP can do whatever they want with your data. Btw, they shouldn't be allowed to do that in the first place, as we are paying them for using their service and privacy, not for them selling our private data jeopardising are privacy
ToS also protects the user from throttling though, you pay for the service you pay for and if you can prove they aren't providing that service, you can sue them.
what is with this anti-NN shilling?
Is this an argument? Or an agreement with my comment?
Basically, what I'm saying is, that ISP should mind their own business and not look into my private life or sell my private data. Of course they'll be sued for throttling, because they are not providing the product service that they advertised
Then re-read your ToS.
NN is a leftist idea. Sup Forums has been pro-leftist anything.
An agreement.
Democracy WAS a leftist idea, why does the source of the concept matter?
Unironically yes. Seems the slow shitty dark web is the future.
UK is following in the footsteps.
Time to make make tinfoil hats and join the dark web
independent.co.uk
HAHAHAHA BRITĆUCKS
>NN is a leftist idea
Who fucking cares. NN is critically important to a free and open internet. Do you want to pay more for shittier service? This is next level shillery.
ISPs can raise prices and make their service shittier even with net neutrality Mr. Netflix shill.
>corporations
No shit faggot, how about everyone else?
>Mr. Netflix shill
Top kek. Yeah just shilling for the common man here. Notice the total lack of argument. Just lube up your asshole the ISPs are going in dry. May Stallman strike you down where you stand.
>sorry because of the new net neutrality regulations the government has mandated that we install new meters all over our network to make sure we are in compliance, therefore we will have to double our prices to make up for this increased cost
>coincidentally, the local ISP alternative cannot afford these meters, and are going out of business, so you will be unable to switch to them
Oh vey!
ICANN is distributed now instead of controlled by the US. Not all root DNS servers are in the US. Not fucked at all. If the US tries to restrict the Internet, it will simply fall out of their hands even more.
I feel bad for my fellow ameribros, though.
Now companies can put more of that shit.
Hire even worse programmers.
Because they can pay for their sites to be prioritized at network trunks.
Imagine Internet turning to radio or TV. That's what's happening.
Thankfully net neutrality still stands in eu.
Fucking retarded amerifats that equate 'good for corporate ' to 'anti-comunism'. Thanks to those faggots we will be back to 18th century earnings wise.
Almost as dumb as fuckers who want to rise minimum wage. It will make shit more expensive for everyone.
You fucking retards got stuck with Bloody two parties and candidates. Both are the same shit.
Both are linked together, they dine together, and they basically inherit positions in parties.
And they both pit you against each other so you won't even care. And after few generations it will be the norm. Or probably it already is.
You basically created corrupt oligarchy. Have fun getting rid of that.
Also capitalism is inherently flawed. End goal for any corporation is to attain monopoly. And the longer one Corp is close to the monopoly the more odds are stacked against newcomers.
Which is worst fucking thing that can happen for customers.
Fucking think. Start thinking.
Get rid of electoral college shit. It is just a pure bloat.
Don't change your vote to one of main candidates if yours isn't going to win. By voting anyone other than them you hamstring them both.
For fuck sake, create a 3rd, or 4th party. Even if you get 1% of votes. Next year it might be 1.5%.
And fucking ban lobbying. It is basically a legal bribe.
Inb4 communism. Nope,fuck that shit. Lived through aftermath of it - and it was horrible.
Stop seeing politics in black and white. Us or them. Commies or capitalists. Conservatives Vs liberals.
Remember TPP? USA was fucked before the elections
The sad thing is that ISPs will probably be prioritizing highly commercial sites like Netflix and Facebook so the average person probably won't ever realize anything even happened.
Would any of you guys be interested in kicking off a nationwide mesh net? Would be fun, desu.
It would have to be wireless, which would be catastrophic.
the phrase is "oy vey"
>which would be catastrophic
why? with enough nodes it will be a non-issue
>ISP alternative
Fuckin lel.
>Cmon my fellow goyim! Let's get rid of nasty net neutrality so some bits can be transmitted via (((fast lanes)))! No bamboozle
fedex.com
Literally hitler!
Right because some bits are special bits, friend! Got to pay extra for the (((premium electrons)))
>OH vey indeed
>oh vey some atoms are special atoms friend! Gotta pay extra!
>moving differently sized physical objects across the country is the same as sending electrical signals over a wire
Either you're a liar or you're really, really dumb. Not much middle ground here.
Are you a shill, a retard, or both?
>pay more for bigger and heavier packages
>pay more for longer sequences of electrons
It's annudah shoah!
>longer sequence of electrons
Confirmed for retard shill
this is called bandwidth and we already do this, this does not excuse arbitrary restrictions on specific domains
again you are fucking stupid
There are no arbitrary restrictions. We were talking about paid prioritization but you made the retarded argument about different sized physical objects.
>sending electrical signals over a wire
Right, so why does AWS/Azure etc charge a shit ton extra if you use more "electric signals"
I see they brought in the elite shill brigade
>azure/AWS
Oh I am laffin
> different sized physical objects
the point was that they're not the same, dumbfuck
>two packages
>same size and weight
>wait a minute, mista goldberg. This one is from momandpopshop's mail order website. My brotha is Amazon's CFO. Wuddayasay this one gets lost for a couple of days?
anyway enjoy getting attention from other people, I'm done talking to you mentally handicapped goofus
Hang on, what, a literal Great British Firewall? Like China? Is the dark net honestly the future?
trumpcel cope
Mom and pop shop is perfectly capable of paying more for overnight shipping just like Amazon you fucking retard. It's their own fault for being cheap bastards while Amazon goes the extra mile to ensure their customers are happy.
So if bandwidth doesn't cost anything why do hosting sites charge you more for using more bandwidth?
Neck yourself bezos
>wahhh I shouldn't have to pay more if I want my packages delivered faster!!
>bandwidth
>data amount not origin
GAS
A
S
This, the real enemy of man is the scared elitest.
That's not paid prioritisation or a fast lane. That's being forced to pay more money to maintain the quality of service you already had. When there's no reason other than "because I can", that's called extortion... and the additional costs will be passed to to customers. Enjoy paying another $5 for Netflix or whatever.
Yeah but it would be wireless.
it doesn't
I don't use Netflix and I don't see why I should subsidize Netflix users. The other alternative is ISPs lowering the quality of service and increasing prices for everyone. Because yay Net Neutrality!
Have fun building it.
It is great ideas but you would have to build your own infrastructure
*parents' home
What the fuck are you talking about?
And sadly in western world no one notices that.
They won.
Get rid of regulation and you'll get freedom.