Let us talk about Sweden, to dismantle the origin of the cuckoldry virus that struck Europe

Let us talk about Sweden, to dismantle the origin of the cuckoldry virus that struck Europe.

Why are you doing this, Sweden?

Other urls found in this thread:

swissinfo.ch/eng/equal-pay_gender-wage-gap-widens-in-switzerland/38491840
bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/03/04/blank/key/lohnstruktur/nach_geschlecht.html
youtube.com/watch?v=pt8VYOfr8To
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Sweden legitimately saddens me. It was such a great country, almost perfect, then they went and ruined it by trying to be nice.

I heard that they feel guilty about turning away refugees something like 80 years ago, kinda like Germany feels guilty about WWII.

Could be the origin of the cuck phenomenon.

It definitely started in the 1960s, with Oluf Palme and a sweeping leftist movement who wanted to better Swedish society, since a lotof the previous generation were closet nazis.

is there a book about modern scandinavia you could recommend?

Well, you know, I suppose it's just good intentions but a lack of forethought and poor management.

Nah, it was the late 70s early 80s that Palme started his little plans of "solidarity", He had close ties with Russia and said fuck you to the US when he opposed the vietnam war. His politics were kinda good (still socialism, but he did wonders to the workers and such) when you apply them to just swedes (like he intended) but now his party wants to be him and fucks everything up with inviting the whole fucking world.

Our previous state minister who drove mass immigration for 8 years and held speeches like "Sweden, open your cold hearts" wrote a book in the 90s called 'The sleeping people' He talks about his vision where he wants to break down the swedish welfare model. His primary way of doing this can be linked to his mass immigration project he did with the green party. So yea, he should be shot for what he did

Don't forget that his now even more rich thanks to his "investment" in asylum accommodation.

It's the side-effect of being a war-profiteering parasite with inclinations towards political submissiveness.

Literally all degeneracy of the modern era originates from Germany and the US. Stop lying.

So, the fault is his inner jew wanting sheckels from immigrants... what a plan!

we're paving the way for a one world government where we all get along and peace is assured :-)))

Sven
Neck yaself)))))

It's the Jews.

Lel

Yes, America invented Islam, African culture, Marxism, feminism, and green tea. Danes are brilliant.

Sweden isn't the origin, it's just been struck hardest by cultural marxism propagated by the hollyjews.

No, the big plan was to raze the welfare state and with it the Swedish model, he was part of Moderaterna, the """right""" wing party that wanted to privatize everything.

Getting money from immigrants was just a nice bonus, but by taking in an abnormal amount of refugees from third world nation who can't possibly become a net gain without lowering wages and basically making them the Mexicans of Sweden you put the Swedish system under a pressure it was not designed to handle

>Islam
>degenerate

Wew lad. Islam is literally Sup Forums: the religion.

May be you can make a good military army or workers from immigrants and try to establish a new scandinavian empire in the north? Why not?

>2016
>people still use marxism as a buzzword which has literally no meaning in their mouths
never change Sup Forums

What exactly is cultural Marxism. Can't even find it on wikipedia wtf

>Modern Era
Granted that the original goal of feminism (equal pay, days off, and right to vote) isn't as degenerate as r9klord like you might think, then you can basically blame women and media in the US for advocating in women's favor.

It's nothing, just a meaningless concept Sup Forums likes to throw around
And when they explain to you what it is, you realise it has nothing to do with marxism to start with

It's something like...

>Cultural Marxists: "We're pro-trannies, pro-gay, pro-roastbeef rights and pro-open borders"

>Anti-Cultural Marxists: "We're pro-trannies, pro-gay, pro-roastbeef rights and pro-open borders but we're not pushy about it"

Let's keep Sup Forums in Sup Forums instead

Too bad the supposed wage gap is a complete fucking myth.

I can't understand your Muslim grammar.
Careful with that edge.

wow you sure showed me

>to dismantle the origin of the cuckoldry virus that struck Europe.
fix America then

I'm not even a communist, but we would all be cucked peasants working in coal mines and factories if it wasn't for Marx.

Your English sucks and you come off as one of those MRM pussies.

I'm shitposting on a Tibetan throat-singing forum, not writing a thesis on microbiology. Calm your titties, Antonio "Tico" Gonzales.

>Granted that the original goal of feminism (equal pay, days off, and right to vote) isn't as degenerate
I understood this part, I don't think you're shitposting, you genuinely believe this because you're an emasculated male like all Scandinavians.

Good question. Why are we doing this, America?

>this coming from Germany
oh god my sides

Nice logical fallacy you got there, shame if someone were to poke a hole in it.

There's a very clear difference in the what feminism used to be, and what feminism is today. I do not agree with the way society favors women over men, unlike the emasculated male that you refer to. I'm even against gender quotas. All it does is enforce an even bigger gender inequality.

Also what's wrong with women voting? Women make up the majority of one of the largest anti-immigration parties in Denmark.
Unlike in America, where they're all voting for Shillary, because she's a woman and not an evil racist and it'll empower them if she became president.

Why do you waste your time on obvious bait?

>Careful with that edge.
Still a myth.

Unequal pay is a crime (around here). I don't see feminists going to police, but into social media echo chambers.

The love for sense and reason dies slowly.

I've had a long day of work and I need to let out my autism. Besides, I gotta give the poor sob some sort of fulfillment in life.

It's a crime against the European Convention so we can assume it's non-existent in all EU nations. And believe me, those fuckers interpret law strictly.

>Also what's wrong with women voting?
This is like asking what's wrong with letting children or dogs vote. You're so bereft of common sense that you're too stupid to argue with.

Perhaps more importantly it doesn't make any economic sense whatsoever.

If women truly were paid less than men then surely employers would overwhelmingly employ women since they'd be saving a lot of money in doing so. You don't even need laws against since the economics of it is self-regulating by default.

>common sense
That's some Russian tier "argumentation" right there

>Still a myth.
I know the wage gap is bullshit. I don't think that Swede believes what he's saying though. He's being edgy. Deep down all Swedish males are like the pic in OP.

It's about as logical as the American definition of "white", ya mutt.

Google "Anders Behring Breivik". :^)

back to your containment board Sup Forumsack

No it's not self-regulating
It's a sort of black market, it's not done in the light
At least in Switzerland where these kind of studies and researches are done in the light and it's not just complottism, and the results are public for everyone to see

swissinfo.ch/eng/equal-pay_gender-wage-gap-widens-in-switzerland/38491840

bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/03/04/blank/key/lohnstruktur/nach_geschlecht.html

Plenty of sources to look at at the end of both links if you want to look into it

t. thomas piketty

fuck off with your socialism

>let's dismiss tons of official researches, studies and data, and call him a socialist, it will surely show him!

No one even tries to deny the wage gap in Switzerland, everyone is aware it exists, but swiss society is kind of conservative and this is why socialists didn't manage to change it yet

t. not a french and not a socialist

This is from the very article you linked (and probably didn't even read)

>“For some well-paid posts you have to be prepared to give more effort. It’s really men who are ready to accept the extra hours,” he told the Bund and Tages-Anzeiger newspapers.

>He added that women generally preferred “regular hours and work conditions that are less unpredictable”.

And here the response

>“It’s shocking to blame women for the discrimination they are victims of, just like it’s unacceptable to say a second household income has less value,” reacted Alleva.

From the very get go there's emotionally loaded language as to divert the attention of the reader to some perceived injustice instead of actually addressing the very real fact of sexual dimorphism. Men are not just women with penises. There are real biological differences that are expressed both physically and perhaps more importantly mentally. Men are by nature more risk taking than women. In several experiments women consistently ask for lower wages than men. This is not discrimination or even a problem but simply a fact of life. And that's why I called you a socialist, because you seemingly want equality of outcome and not equality of opportunity.

Yes I did read the articles, and if you continued reading it is said that about 40% the difference in wage (within the same profile) can be traced back to actual objective factors, like, as you said, the different work ethic of men and women

But then you admit there's a wage gap, just that it's not discriminatory or intentional.

Should we fix it? Might not be fair but what is, since we give autismbux and social services to worthless parasites I see nothing wrong with promoting the women who actually contribute to society.

And how to "fix" this?
youtube.com/watch?v=pt8VYOfr8To
Done.

To make a simple example, if your average woman earns 5800 from a job, and your average man earns 6000 for the same job, you can attribute only half of the difference (100 francs) to objective reasons, and another half is instead due to "unconfirmed reasons", which is to say discrimination
And I've seen this happen in real life too, men and women who have the same exact CV and work the same hours for the same job, with slight differences in wages. Sure, it's not much, but that's the reason why there is no uproar and the movement against it has no political power: it's not much
The government recognises it's unfair but the reason behind not implementing laws against this is that it's "economically not viable", so they say. I'm no economist, who am I to judge this statement

I'm saying that IF there is a wage gap it's not the product of discrimination but a simple matter of biology. Now there might very well be a cultural component to it as well, but I think this is rather minimal in most western cultures.

It's not a problem if women earn less if they on average choose to work on more comfortable hours. In fact it would be outright unfair to try and minimize the wag gap under such circumstances. Equally, any wage gap caused by women on average seeking professions that pay less than those men seek, is not a problem. That's a matter of supply and demand and should not be "corrected" by government.

It's only unfair is women get paid less for exactly the same job given that the woman in question is as aggressive as her male counterparts when negotiating for her wage. Wage negotiations is a bargaining process in which both parties try to get as much out of it as possible, if she settles for less than her male counterparts that's her decision and calling it unfair is more of a buyers remorse than anything else.

>That's a matter of supply and demand and should not be "corrected" by government

But the ten million other bidrag are A-OK, you mean?

>But the ten million other bidrag are A-OK, you mean?
How are government handouts relevant to the matter at hand and when have I ever said anything even eluding to my opinion on the matter?

READ IT OP.