What do Apple haters have to say about this

What do Apple haters have to say about this.

Android BTFO.

get a laptop you numale autistic faggot

I have a laptop retard,

Let me test it I'm curious.

then youre throwing your parents money away dipshit

>2kb benchmark

Meanwhile when trying to resize a 10mb jpg iShit chokes like a little bitch.

>2017
>Tablet
>iToddlers actually waste their money extremely overpriced and oversized phones
lol

>my money

which couldve went towards drugs like any responsible adult spends their money on

The OS is still shit. Android is 10x better.

Non-durable goods are a waste of money.

Laptop did pretty good.

How many times are you going to make this exact same thread today?

Single core A10x = Single core Intel i7-4710MQ

You jealous?

Apple has has good specs with their custom OS for years but that doesn't negate that the iPhone is still regular consumerist garbage.

stop with this garbage benchmark applel nigger

Give me a bench mark to compare the A10x to the i7-4710mq.

Adobe Premiere.

Something free plz.

>t. iToddler poorfag

What do Apple fantards have to say about real app performance? From CPUs on phones that cost 1/3 at that.

iToddlers BTFO.

You scared it's going to smoke Intel?

Upgrade to ios11 and try it again?

You scared to post real app performance?

Applebench literally does not compare across different OS and archs. Half of the CPU crap is useless crypto. Don't even bother replying to these weak bait threads.

So give me a bench to run on iOS and I'll run it.

>So give me a bench

fake and gay

delete the thread now

iOS can't run real benches

That's your excuse?

Here's a real benchmark.

Try it.

Too scared a10x will smoke i7 in benchmarks your only excuse is iOS doesn't have any benchmarks to run because the ones it has it's on par with i7.

>excuse
FACT

>33 posts
>11 IPs
Really makes you think

>this is what iToddlers actually believe

Yeah, here's one of Applel's """""""amazing""""""" iPaddles processing basic text input.

lmao

>running the non-Apple-authorized web browser Chrome
Try again poorfag.

>lagPad can't even run chrome without lagging like shit

FUCKIN KEK

Not even Pentium 4's lagged on text input. Applel is a fucking joke.

>not knowing chrome is a shitty bloated fork of Safari.

How will iToddlers EVER recover?

That appears to be an iPad 3 running iOS 9. You think any mobile device that gets five years of updates is going to run like new? Show me the Android devices that are supported for five years at all.

why, will your selfie show up?

fucking kek

AMD, INTEL, SAMSUNG, QUALCOMM BTFO

>t. iToddler

>iCuck
>fagOS
>4GB RAM in 2017
>not suitable for work
>look at my $9999 girly pink facebook machine
>lags on facebook regardless
Pic related is the only thing Applel products are suitable for.

Shill marketing thread.

640$

Nice if running benchmarks all day is your thing.
I personally would rather buy something that does what it has to do for as cheap as possible so when ik breaks I can throw it in the trash, pick up a new one and still save money.

>Buy some shitty android tablet that scores 2000 on geekbench.

Waste 3 seconds every link you click.

My Nvidia shield suffices for $200. I don't even use it for gaymin because I'm not 15 anymore

Post the geekbench.

>iOS 10

Wtf is iPad 7.1?

I am not at home right now, I will be in an hour and post geekbench

That's Geekbench 3

iPad Pro 2

Download Geekbench 4

I'm not paying REAL money for someone on the internet

It's 1$ you shitskin

sorry but I'm white, please keep the racism on your containment board

t. poorfag

>lagPad

What’s the point in downloading Geekbench 4 again

It’s really sad if you haven’t seen the Pro 2 videos yet

it shows scores you retarded faggot

Forgot file

It's really sad you think your angrybirdsPad can even compare to real CPUs.

Where did I say that though? Do you just get angry and start typing nonsense?

But the software makes it completely useless. It's probably a fake score anyways. I've seen $50 chinkphones with 8 cores at 4.5GHz with 10GB of RAM, at least according to their software.

itunes tho

>5kb benchmarks totally reflect how a CPU will perform in 100MB apps or processing 10GB video files

This is why iToddlers are universally dismissed as technology illiterate retards. They don't even understand the points they try to shill.

Safari is a bloated shit storm of a shit company attempting to make a browser from restricted funds

If you run devices 5 years after their release and expect them to operate like new than show a single model from Apple that hasn't showed up in the store for a "genius" to take a look.

Every type of apple device, just like Android's, have come into stores for service. Your idea of "support" after purchase doesn't reign against the fact that many people have been scammed out of money for fake support no matter their device and your god Apple can't stop that.

>geekbench

yo, your shit weak cuz.

/thread

explain.

Geekbench is SHIT.

It actually seems to have gotten worse with version 3, which you should be aware of. On ARM64, that SHA1 performance is hardware-assisted. I don't know if SHA2 is too, but Aarch64 does apparently do SHA256 in the crypto unit, so it might be fully or partially so.

And on both ARM and x86, the AES numbers are similarly just about the crypto unit.

So basically a quarter to a third of the "integer" workloads are just utter BS. They are not comparable across architectures due to the crypto units, and even within one architecture the numbers just don't mean much of anything.

And quite frankly, it's not even just the crypto ones. Looking at the other GB3 "benchmarks", they are mainly small kernels: not really much different from dhrystone. I suspect most of them have a code footprint that basically fits in a L1I cache.

Linus

I wonder why multi core scaling is so bad

There are absolutely tons of loads that don't come even close to fitting in L1I. People already mentioned browsers, and the point would be to load a new page, not load some single page that then has some specific single element on it that is heavy.

In fact, my experience is totally opposite from yours. Stuff that has a small code footprint I'm not at all interested in hearing benchmarks for, because I already know it will be "fast enough". If it's some common graphics thing, it's accelerated by the GPU. If it's not graphics-related, I can't even imagine why I'd ever want to run some kernel like that on my phone.

Do you really claim otherwise? Do you really find that it's the _simple_ things that are too slow, so you want to benchmark those kinds of loads? That makes no sense.

The crypto benchmarks make no sense either. Nobody does pure crypto. On a phone or tablet, your crypto is going to be dwarfed by the IO speed - either network or the flash write speed. Why would anybody encrypt/decrypt something that isn't sent out/received externally? So why bother testing something irrelevant? Are you expecting cracker networks to use their cellphones to crack passwords?

A small code footprint also almost totally hides things like branch prediction table sizes etc. And branch mis-prediction in turn doesn't just affect the pipeline, it affects how well you can prefetch both code and data through OoO. So it's not just I$ fetch, it's a lot of things that go along with "small trivial code size".

Making the data working set larger doesn't change any of these kinds of issues. It just makes the repeat-rates higher, and puts pressure on the D$. Yes, that in turn shows if the memory pipe is complete crap, but it really misses a lot about the core CPU.

Complex GUI stuff (and phones/tablets are definitely moving in that direction) tends to have all these fancy GUI libraries, often object-oriented ones. And you see code with tons of indirect function calls, lots of wrapper functions (ie one function massages some arguments a bit and then just calls another function), and no, it's not inlined because it's often all about interfacing between different library levels (webkit, various font rendering libraries, low-level drivers for "in memory" vs "on screen" yadda yadda).

That's how "hot loops" end up being bigger than the L1 I$. Rendering an anti-aliased glyph really is a lot more complicated than doing a SHA-1 round. And that's just one glyph. Now do layout for a full web-page etc.

Linus

now my toy can play more games at once than ever before!

There seemed to be some power saving going on

ITODDLERS

PERPETUALLY

CONTINUALLY

CONSTANTLY

INCESSANTLY

EVERLASTINGLY

UNREMITTINGLY

INTERMINABLY

PERMANENTLY

ETERNALLY

BLOWN

THE

FUCK

OUT

UNTIL THE END OF TIME

Nvidia shield ROFLMAO.

Shield is a meme.

Admit your inferiority to Apple and the A SoC.

Admit you're an iToddler brainlet.

>comparing hardware with software
iSheeps are this retarded

2988 vs 9343.

Shield post your 3dmark.

Not an Apple hater, nor an Apple fanboy - but I'll say this about it:
It's a damn shame Apple's ARM gear is restricted to only Apple's locked down platform.

Yes they can you stupid moron.
Every website is now HTTPS and every transaction is encryption, the performance of the encryption units is tantamount to the performance of the machine now.

I don't think its too bad for a device that costed $200 2 years ago

Do you come here to post this everyday?

Yes, I'm a friendly messenger from Sup Forums.

NVIDIA BTFO.

I would never buy a GPU from them again because the gimping and vender lock-in shit of them but the tablet was a good deal.

>costed

>from Sup Forums
Oh, so you're actually retarded...

Time to catch some sleep I guess

Probably for the best.

>google supporter is also a jew loving sjw
Makes sense.

You do realise there's no point to this ? You are not proving anything to anyone. You just look fucking ignorant. I'm a apple user and I'm ashamed to be correlated with you, you idiotic asshole