it needs to come back
Encarta
Other urls found in this thread:
>what is en.wikipedia.org
neck yourself fucker
What we need is a version of Mind Maze that sources questions from Wikipedia.
That's actually a pretty good idea.
I have my finals soon, might try and get to it afterwards.
>literally anyone can edit it
>no one even verifies the information is accurate
This
I have encarta 2007 on a desktop computer that doesn't have internet acces and its comfy af. Also have English french and japanese wikipedia on a 32gb Usb universal zip dongle bus
>literally anyone can edit it
>no one even verifies the information is accurate
[citation needed]
Tje cultural marxism page is the best proof of that and for the past couple years 99% of articles that can be politized have been subjects to edit wars mostly between rabid leftists and innocent reverters
>99% of articles that can be politized
Atomic orbital article can't be politicized.
>atoms are racis and shit fuck trump and fuck white people
Now they can
That's a hyperbole!
That's a racist word you cishet shitlord
That's why you seek the information you need and then use sources for that information that often found there, idiot.
Biased sources.
This
It was comfy, and free from SJW propaganda.
Okay grandpa, let me explain it to you. There's an entire community behind Wikipedia dedicated to stopping retarded people like you from shitting it up. And anyways you always need to link a source for any piece of information that you're adding to a page.
>innocent reverters
Like Encarta and Brockhaus articles. Proves his point.
I don't remember which version it was, but there was one where you could wander around 3D historical reconstructions of the Athens acropolis, the Colosseum, and other shit like some Welsh castle, shit was comfy af.
...