There are rare occasions when I feel bad about the Sweden bullying on this board, but then it does something like this

There are rare occasions when I feel bad about the Sweden bullying on this board, but then it does something like this.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=upP-QNtrlqU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_Battalion
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>It's a retarded cumskin pretending white devils didn't enlish brown and black people in their blind destruction of the world thread

this

really feel bad for them, putting their lives at risk to protect the most rancid race to ever walk to earth

poor fellas

>tfw shiks are hardy fighters, loyal as fuck, keep tradition and culture without forcing it on others, generally polite and respectful
>tfw generalized with shitty -istans and south indians
i know this is pretty leafy to say but shiks are bro tier

*sikhs
You should know how to spell your own religion Gurdeep

>Sikhs are bro tier
I swear to fucking god this EXACT phrase is used thousands of times a day on the internet. Is everyone copy+pasting their opinions from google or something? Why the fuck is it always the exact same wording? Are you a bot?

Sikhs really are bro tier though

>Gurdeep
wew

lmao, i kinda used the phrase due to memes, but my point stands true

Why is there a black man in a slouch hat? We don't have any blacks. Is he supposed to be a Maori?

I don't see the problem? There were foreign soldiers fighting for the British Empire and it is a video game after all stop taking everything seriously you autistic cunt.

...

France enlisted Africans to fight in combat units in Europe but France is not in multiplayer.

>the memes are true

>ruins my immersive history.
NO!

He's obviously American.

It's just a shitty meme.

>I don't see the problem?
Is that a question you stupid cum viking?

It's not about there being colonial troops. It's about them being MAINLY colonial troops. Out of the 8 playable classes shown, only 3 of when were actually white. Out of Britains 4 classes, only one of them is white. Yes, blacks and pakis did fight in WW1. But it was mainly, largely, white Brits.

>being buttflustered about a shitty series.

You do know they do this shit to trigger people and get more sales

>You do know they do this shit to trigger people and get more sales

They haven't done it before and they're doing it now because their >Sweden >Yes is showing.

What's wrong? There were tons of Indians and black people in WWI and other colonial troops.

By now everyone knows that Swedes need to be genocided, nothing new.

Fun fact.
Women soldiers ALMOST happened.
But they changed their minds last minute.

>tons
No there weren't. The German colonial troops stayed in Africa. The vast majority of black US troops were in labour companies. Only France had a noticable number of black combat troops in Europe but France isn't even in multiplayer.

What's bad in showing people the actual picture of the WWI where the whole world fought? If there were Russia I would add Wild Division, for example (famous for their bravery division made of Caucasus peoples). You know, even in Brave Soldier Schweik there is a scene where Schweik is captured and put to captive camp for Caucasians.

THIS

I didn't know Sweden almost joined the war.

>playing EA games
>2016

2-1

See They're misrepresenting reality. They could've included France in multiplayer which would've made the black fighters more realistic. Instead, it's the German troops who are black. And they just plopped a random beardless indian in there even though it was Sikhs who were in combat units.

Didn't Russia use female and children soldiers at the end of the war?

youtube.com/watch?v=upP-QNtrlqU

Was America even in WW1?

There were tons of colonial troops and the game wants to represent them to show us the sides of war ignored by westerners previously. I'd like them to show Eastern Front because no one in the West seems to know anything about it too despite it is very interesting and war there could reveal for westerners reasons of our revolution.

Yes, not to the extent of the Canadians, but yes.

>There were tons of colonial troops and the game wants to represent them to show us the sides of war ignored by westerners previously.

You don't understand. Shoehorning random non-whites in random spots isn't showing any side of anything. Imagine a movie about Alan Turing where he's protrayed as a transgendered Nigerian guy. It's not informative. It's driven by an agenda.

...

>What's bad in showing people the actual picture of the WWI where the whole world fought?
But they are not showing it, they completely ignore many big factions that fought there and instead add muh diversity which had very little part in the actual composition of armies.
I would play the shit out of this game if I could play as a cossack on a horse fucking everyone up with my shashka though.

>children
No
>female
Yes. Tsar was retarded idiot and we were half-colony. WWI was a great mistake for us to be involved but Europeans made Tsar participate because of French credits and that all our industry was owned by Europeans. I have no fuckin regret he was shot in the end, he deserved it.
>Instead, it's the German troops who are black
Who cares, it's a game. They just want to show you more actual picture and not that myth about "GREAT WAR" you have in the West.

pretty badas desu senpai

He is a Harlem Hellfighter. An American soldier who was given to French command because he was black. The US didn't want black people to be the face of the US expeditionary force in Europe. So black soldiers were either in supporting roles or given to the French.

>Who cares, it's a game.
If you don't care why are you in this thread?

see
It's social engineering and they're open about it. Sweden is a humanitarian superpower. They're brainwashing younger people.

So what? It's good agenda. You can show people simplified but good intended picture showing that all the world participated there. It makes game more interesting and inspiring.

You sound like a communist straight out of 1920's.

>EA
>actual picture

I don't know about children, but woman actually took part in some WWI combat action.
see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_Battalion

The only 2% that mattered baby.

No the black characters in multiplayer are German troops. It doesn't make sense. Black German troops fought in Africa.

They should show Russians too, that's right. It would be racist not to show us while we lost so many people there.

REEEEE
World is changing, you westerners don't comprise the majority of world population anymore and you don't have the right to dictate others you picture of the world. Swedes are doing good thing showing all the sides participating and not only westerners because it is suitable for the modern world. That game wouldn't be popular anywhere except the west if there would be only whites fighting in western front (and what would be not true because colonial troops participated).

It's still a fucking agenda that just makes game an urealistic shit show that if anything only devalues the WW1 heritage.
>showing that all the world participated there
They are only showing the opposite of that by excluding major factions.

I'm talking about the cover character.

Dude a fuckton of shit that may or may not make sense in them it's not a fuckign agenda?

Is one Japanese dev making their protag white an agenda. no it's because making the guy white will hit the widest audiences. Many movies that take place in Africa have shit focused on whites to give it a global appeal.

>if anything only devalues the WW1 heritage.

Liek it hasn't already.

No oen knows that WW1 was happening on the Eastern Front, Asia or Africa. It's all Western Front WW1's. Perception has already been ruined ages ago.

Yeah, they just consciously distorted the history for no particular reason. Must be just their creative vision that is definetly not influenced by anything.

>be french
>not even important enough to be in the game
lmao

This
What's bad in it? If they show people that there were not only Europeans fighting and there was anything outside the Western Front it's good. Western myths should be destroyed.

But putting unrealistic amount of non-europeans in historical settings exactly is a western myth made by a diversity agenda. What's good about distorting history?

>What's good about distorting history?
I think you're talking to a reanimated member ofoтдeл aгитaции и пpoпaгaнды.

except the slav side...

It's still better than them showing only Europeans and telling nothing about Eastern front

Not adding Eastern front would be racist too, that's correct. At least they should mention it or add Russian character.

Maybe, but at the same time not having the Eastern front and at the same time having too many minorities makes them look even more like hypocritical faggots.

as panslavic as i am i would be ok with a russian character. But a shitload of slovenes, slovacks, czecks, poles,... got killed in the trenches of both fronts, for a foregin overlord who used us a cannonfoder and gasfilters... And political corectnes will never touch us...
Death to the decandent west!

Ahahahaha what a footnote.

>2%

Barely

They have your Winchester 1895's in the 'sniper class' roster.

>but no russians

top kek

yeah pretty much no one is original, same shit goes with le attack helicopter meme xd

ты вooбщe кaкoйтo eбaнyтый лoл

You know that's bullshit Ivan. France is completed excluded from the game without explanation, and they were one of the if not the largest participant in the war.

France is DLC.
They completely manufactured this controversy.

>France is DLC
In what capacity?

Literally unacceptable. All memes aside making a WW1 game centralizing focus on the European theater is fucking trash, no excuse.

>1 dude spends maybe a day or two creating textures
>THEY'RE GOING OUT OF THEIR WAY TO BRAINWASH OUR YOUTH
>IT'S HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
>THIS VIDEO GAME THAT DIDN'T REALLY CARE MUCH FOR ACCURACY (inb4 screenshot of dev saying they tried for accuracy, that's a blatant lie, every dev of a game that takes place in a historical event says that) MAKING A BLACK CHARACTER PLAYABLE IS THE EXACT SAME THING AS SAYING WHITE PEOPLE DID NOTHING DURING WWI IN A HISTORY TEXTBOOK
top kek

Battlefield was never about accuracy.

>WW1 game
>France only available as a payed-DLC
>No eastern front
>Instead you play as a unit of dindus that fought in a handful of skirmishes

What the fuck were they thinking?

Except the fact that they're making a huge game set in a European war and instead of playing the Europeans that fought in it you play as Private Tarquan

...

>Except the fact that they're making a huge game set in a European war and instead of playing the Europeans that fought in it you play as Private Tarquan
>d instead of playing the Europeans that fought in it
You still get to play as a variety of white guys. You guys are chimping out over a fucking recolor, that's pathetic.

>makes a big fucking deal about playing as the Harlem Hellfighters.
>Can't even model a correct rifle for him.
This is all a big show and you know it.

kek

This is exactly my point. It's not historical revisionism, it's 'hey this one dude has an extra week, let's tell him to change him some colors'.

>Educating people the fact that WW1 involved more than Europoors sitting in trenches
>Bad

ah so they're cucked AND incompetent

Trading game content and quality in exchange for arbitrary political motives ends up with a trash product. EA needs to be burned to the ground. I don't even game much anymore but I know what a rotten management looks like.

West Europe matters. Rest of the world doesn't in regards to WW1. That's just the way it is it's just one of those media things.

>Educating young people that German Empire's African soldiers were involved in the European theatre while they weren't
>educating young people 3/4 of soldiers in WW1 were non-white
>good

>Bullying on the internet
OH NO you fat neckbeard half-nigger

That's what I meant to say. For this reason and having France being excluded makes the game DOA for all good intentions.

>Trading game content and quality in exchange for arbitrary political motives ends up with a trash product. EA needs to be burned to the ground.
>getting THIS MAD over this
I don't think you realize how little goes into making a handful of recolored textures. There would be no significant enough difference in labor to improve game content and quality.

>arbitrary political motives
Excuse me while I change the attached pic from a regular lel to a golden lel. They're pandering to sell extra games and get good reviews for almost 0 effort. It is not some massive conspiracy, they are trying to make as much money while putting in as little effort as possible.

why did they bother making the black guy textures in the first place :^)

>They're pandering to sell extra games and get good reviews for almost 0 effort. It is not some massive conspiracy, they are trying to make as much money while putting in as little effort as possible.
Literally in my post.

so EA DOES need to be burnt to the ground then

>A DOES need to be burnt to the ground
Fucking this, the sooner EA, Activision and Ubisoft die the better

this
i can't believe people still buy EA games after bf4.
atleast the new dragon age failed miserably

>EA and Dice wants to be inclusive and pander to everyone to make maximum profit
>Sweden yes! Sweden yes!

This board is incredible sometimes

Colonial troops were a thing. And Battlefailed has been a CoD clone for some time now, so it's not like it matters.

>so EA DOES need to be burnt to the ground then
t. 2004

>people are still this upset about "darkies in muh vidya"