Give me legitimate reasons why you would need more than this

give me legitimate reasons why you would need more than this

No.

you aren't a manchild and use your CPU for non-gaymen reasons such as compilation and virtualization

because more coars
especially since you can actually make use of them these days

wherein OP defines "legitimate" to mean "only what I personally approve of"

and is also a faggot

Thats not the one you're looking for it's the 2500 model you need.

What did they mean by this?

give me legitimate reasons why you would need more than this

>muh games
fuck off kiddos

>muh rendering
>muh data analysis
>muh CAD
outsource that shit to the cloud nigger

>muh multitasking
your brain can't process more than 24FPS or more than two programs

guaranteed (You)

—More cores
—More efficient cores
—New feature extensions
—Support for faster RAM
—Support for newer chipsets

Need I go on?

Machine "learning" memery cause I'm too stupid to use cuda/opencl, but smart enough to use a threadpool.

CPU's always get better.

That said, I have that chip with a closed loop watercooler and it has been running at 4.4 pretty much nonstop since >2011 with no issues

wow that thing has like 11 cores

>before AMD Ryzen
No.
>after AMD Ryzen
Yes.

Matlab

because programmers are going to keep getting lazier and software is going to keep getting more poorly optimized forever.

...

I don't get this picture, hyperthreading was a legitimately good development for Intel and Nehelem and Westmere were very competitive against the Phenom II. Not to mention Sandy Bridge of course BTFOing Bulldozer.

Bulldozer wasn't a bad product, but AMD needed a LOT more marketshare before throwing their weight around, creating a crazy novel architecture and telling the community to "optimize for this, bitch!"

because its 6 years old and I need cores for virtualization

So I don't have to close one application to run another to prevent unwanted performance hits.

Because the chipset is fucking ancient.

Because the R5 1600 exists