Yfw a gunfag said he needed a gun to protect himself from a tyrannous government near me

>yfw a gunfag said he needed a gun to protect himself from a tyrannous government near me
How to explain this...

What?

What's wrong with the right to bear arms? I don't see your argument

well if he is a true American he will be able to shot down plane using only his gun and a bottle of shitty bear while he fucks his sister

Do retards think the government will literally kill most of its citizens?

Do retards think that the members of the military would agree to this?

Do retards think you can win such a war against your own people?

Well here it kinda happen, the rebels knew they were going to get reckt, it's about making a political victory.

Didn't the Maya resist the Mexican government for almost 70 years in the 19th century?

>military pledges to the constitution, not the government

It'd be perfectly fine for the military to rebel against a tyrannical president

Exactly my point?

Most of the members of the members of the military would not support tyranny

The Spanish colonial government and for a time also the Mexican government, however 1994 no Mayans were involved yes, they are still in a way independent, but their population is not what it used to be

>not fucking your sister
this is why your country is third world

Well just adding to it

Its something a lot of people dont know

I was actually referring to the Caste War which lasted over half a century and Mayan resistance was not completely suppressed until the 1930s.

You have no idea how hard it is to put down an insurgency, especially one with the support of the populace, especially since most insurgencies also receive backing from foreign governments hoping to capitalize on the situation (as was the case in Vietnam and Afghanistan).

Anyone have that /k/ picture detailing the US govs own assessment on how a full rebellion would play out?

Its not pretty for anyone. That includes you Europe.

The reason why Yucatan is not an independent nation, I misunderstood you

-well, t b h the state does kill people, not on a grand scale or openly but I don't doubt that most nations kill certain groups of people or individuals because of political interest

If only a couple of planes could utterly defeat a handful of terrorists without forcing us to sit there for years

Like the US in all of those conspiracy theories?
Really makes you think

The Caste War was an absolutely savage conflict. Lots of mass murders and vicious reprisals. US Marines even landed in Yucatan briefly but spilled their spaghetti and left. This went on for three generations.

In our Civil War, it took 4 years and 600,000 dead to defeat a region of the country that was comparatively unindustrialized and short on the resources to wage war.

The point being you can see how hard it actually is to put down an insurgency.

It's not about winning, it's about making sure a couple of the soldiers they send after me don't go home that night

>Really makes you think
jokes on you faggot, nothing makes me think

Cristero war was pretty much the same

>In our Civil War, it took 4 years and 600,000 dead to defeat a region of the country that was comparatively unindustrialized and short on the resources to wage war.

While true, the South did get a lot of weaponry from the UK. Which goes back to the earlier point about how foreign governments love to exploit rebellions/civil wars to their advantage.

implying that there is something wrong with killing people that disagree with you

Then are the Swiss retarded?
When our air force used some training PC-7 to bomb the shit out of the Zapatista instead of selling more they banned all sales to Mexico

Case in point are the us pilots who flew in the mexican civil war

It had the first "dogfight"

Implying that the US government is capable of waging war against its own citizens, actually

If your argument was valid then Vietnam would be radioactive.

>Mexican civil war
Which one?
If you mean topolobampo battle it was the first time a plane was used to bomb a ship and it was a Mexican pilot

just hire blackwater or similar pmc-corporation to do it

i have halliburton shares btw. war is always profitable,and if you can,sell everything to both sides

It's complicated. It has to be a trickle down effect. Our military is blessed that our soldiers see commonality with its people. Not it's government. But you need to trigger those feelings the right way.

The first instance of plane on plane combat and the first instance of one plane intercepting another during an aerial conflict occurred during the Mexican Revolution in November 30, 1913 between two American soldiers of fortune fighting for opposing sides Dean Ivan Lamb and Phil Rader. Both men had orders to kill but neither pilot wanted to harm the other so they exchanged multiple volleys of pistol fire, intentionally missing before exhausting their supply of ammunition.

They don't want to violate their blessed neutrality-and-our-army-is-only-for-self-defense policy.

If I was promised a good position in the new world a luxury mansion in the pacific my family protected and never had to work again sure I'd gun down my own people.

Shit mercenaries. I would've sent both home.

Ask these guys.

JEWISH

But planes we're seen as a "scouting" vehicle. Not really made for inflicting causalities at the time.

INTERNET

DEFENSE

FORCE

All sandniggers must die

The government couldn't even stop one Mudslime from shooting up a club.

really makes those neurons fire

>Do retards think the government will literally kill most of its citizens?
No you dumb fuck. What they do is extract resources. And guns can prevent this.

>this retarded faggot not reading the news at all

What is Syria? The American government is just as bad, if not worse than Assad

Tanks don't search homes
Planes don't set up checkpoints
Drones don't occupy buildings

Small arms are still relevant for the same reason armies around the world haven't ditched the individual foot soldier as well.

Our people would take down our government even without guns

Bunch of Canberran pansies

those planes dont seem to be doing much to ISIS desu

Only thing guns prevent is traitors staying alive

An assault rifle wouldn't be much use against aircraft or armor, but I quess it's still more convincing than pointing your finger and going "bang bang!" or assembling a peacefull protest and getting a facefull of mace.