Can humans give true random numbers?

Can humans give true random numbers?

Other urls found in this thread:

threatpost.com/academics-make-theoretical-breakthrough-in-random-number-generation/118150/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

5

They can't even give reasonable quality pseudo random numbers. Humans are horrible at being random especially older humans.

Yes if they use random stimulator like throwing a coin. If you prohibit doing anything and stop human from getting any sensational information - no (unless human starts using noise in what his eye sees as entropy source. Try closing an eye and pressing the eyeball for a quick example).

27, faggot

3
Can we shut down this shitty thread now?

Check this 3.

3

Must not be random, these two are the same

is that noise random tho?
shit distribution

3

3
easy peasy

3

>never give limits of random numbers
>complain about distribution
check this 88005553535

3

Interestingly thats actually static noise on the optical nerve, your brain filters it out mostly. Its random.

It's easier to call than shitpost on Sup Forums.

untermenschen

3

you can't tell if it's a shit distribution yet.

3

46987

3

Check my 3

Ask for a random number between 1 and 20 most people will say 17.

Because prime numbers look random enough.

3

That's odd
I'd say 3

Of course:

3

Half-Life 3 confirmed?

Yeah, just take a look at this 5

this is what you get for not calling srand

the fuck am I doing with my life

3 confirmed best random number

22

527333333880055535353346987333335322

Looks random to me.

>not recognising sameposts

3

2548
/thread

61419944

3

3

27

fuck you.

3

Can you even check if a number is truly random?

Yes. 3 is random. 4 isn't a random number though.

...

No, you can only check the distribution of a set of numbers.

define random

even generators based on radioactive decay aren't truly "random" they're just unpredictable with our current understanding of physics

For the most part humans are quite deterministic.

One man can't. Two people can:
threatpost.com/academics-make-theoretical-breakthrough-in-random-number-generation/118150/

3

> is a legit unicode character

fucking seriously

You were pretty unlucky senpai :(

dubs

Hey you! Sup Forums greps out emojis

5977

I though it was Undertale fanart.

I wanna fuck that emoji.

>threatpost
literally who?

OH NO
HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?

>his browser shows emojis

Not your favorite tabloid.

4746729279

>his browser doesn't support Unicode

3

Infinity.
>not using uniform distribution over real numbers

entropy, checking the source of the number.

>all these niggers with integer random numbers
Random numbers should be real and in the [0,1] range. Like this: 0.3

this

Here's a random number that your implementation cannot produce: 2

There's no such thing as "random".

t. non-programmers

unless you're doing graphics programming you usually want to stick to integers whenever you can

Infinity is not an element of the real numbers desu

rand()*2

wew we've found the determinist

look up some feminist lectures on youtube, that's all the random noise you need

Do you even know what random means?

determinism is the only belief that doesn't require an unsubstantiated leap of faith
that is to say next to the alternatives

Yes but you need to not know the number. If you decide to give a "random" number it's not random by default.

...

61420674

no, there's no randomness in nature

Uhh, you're still accepting a dogma. Falsificationism is better, if you have balls to accept that "truth" doesn't exist.

WHOEVER COLOURS THESE HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE'S DOING
AT LEAST GIVE HIM THE TRANSCRIPT OR SOMETHING

Determinism is a spook.

...

...

he's not even holding his thumbs up

truth obviously "exists"

6828263982389361345926350629352523292522


that's about as random as i can get doc

the last 2 digits of this post
48

what the fuck

mother of dog

...

noice

786 allahu akbar

>Colours
Get out, faggot.

Btw "-637192674929284774020395"

...

Yo, that's cash.

Literally the same