prove me wrong
Prove me wrong
why don't you prove your point first
>mfw smartphones have more cores on average than desktop PCs and laptops
Smartphone might be good for very lightweight single task that requires minimal writing effort.
Other than that your claim is false.
smartphones are only good for communicating and displaying information
Actually smart phones are barely competent at any tasks.
no
The pic is correct.
Go fuck Ur self, I'm only doing this BC I go not computer
says who?
>all those cores, still slower than single core Athlon XP.
"a single task", not "single tasks"
is it good at being able to display porn
it is not good at making calls, texting, browsing the internet, etc
"Single tasks" means it can do multiple tasks, one at a time
"being good at single tasks" means there is a pool of multiple tasks it excels at, but that is not the case
it is "good at a single task", porn displaying
I can listen to music and browse the internet just fine on my smarthpone, 2 tasks is multiple not single.
>connect the smartphone to a larger display
what do I win?
>implying background tasks aren't tasks at all
but they aren't
Both are good at both single and multiple tasks, so it's true.
eye-cancer
what are they then?
botnets
background tasks
your wrong proof=me
still a task
On my phone I am currently:
Listening to music
Downloading an app
Communicating to people on telegram
Watching a video
And running a few background processes
These tasks run simultaneously
Therefore
U r wrong
Please go poo in another thread, Pajeet
Yet those cores will never run anything.