Thoughts?

Thoughts?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbreeding_depression
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

Where do loos and achmeds fit in?

Modern science suggests close to the centre.

i never understood this infograph tobehonest desu

Amerindian be aesthetic af

As far as I understand, the closer two groups are on the map, they differ by fewer genes.

Me on the bottom left.

its annoying that they put a malnourished person on the african phenotype

>tfw no one looks like me

add some ahmed rapebabies

...

das racis!

Me on the top right

Me in the centre.

I'm 6'2, blondish-brown hair, strong cheek bones and a masculine jaw, a Roman nose, lean fit muscle mass, I'm of purely western and Northern European ancestry, and I've got what I've been told are "icy" blue eyes.

My father has a friend who's own father was in the Wermacht and who himself is a closet Nazi sympathizer. He to this day nicknamed me "Aryan child."

>all africans are bantus
wow, nice job perpetuating capoid genocide fucking shitlord

there are 3 main groups: caucasians (europeans + middle east), asians and africans. indians are closer to caucasians than to asians

Me in the center, I guess. My nose is different though and I don't have such a beard.

yeah but how does that infograph proves it?

still don't get it
why not use bars or a map with colors

Why are there only Sardinians but not mainland Italians or Sicilians (or even Greeks)?

Really makes me mad.

日本狗 dumb shit

Meant to quote this post:
Anyway it's interesting howand
correspond, there are mainly five big clusters: Euro/Arabs, Nignogs, Amerindian, Chinks, Papuan/Abos, the only thing missing are Pygmies/Khoisan

I think that arabs are just the ultimate mix.
They are a mix of european, asian and african.
In a sense they are the first multicultural experiment

>poos
>center

Whites are the only civilized people.

Hilf Mir bitte
What is the most casual way to say "She is my favorite" in German?

Also if I replace the subject with a noun will the declension change?

t.confused user

...

amerindian can be fit into chinks, the southeast/polynesian ones at least

dravidians are australonesian?

also there's this to be taken in account
there's a lot of "inbetween" points between all the races, especially after the Age of Discovery

Arabs have some Nigger and Asian admixture but it's really minor, they cluster genetically much closer to Euros than to nignogs or Asians, see this:

>amerindian can be fit into chinks

No, they form well distinct clusters

>the southeast/polynesian ones at least

Those aren't Amerindians

I thought arabs were some of the most inbred people in the world?

>dravidians are australonesian?
No but it's what early racialists believed

2bh they all look fairly aesthetic other than the nigger and asian

Does anybody know which two races would be the most genetically distinct?

This map seems to suggest the greatest difference would be between Amazonian Indians and South African Bushmen. Does anybody know if it is possible for bush-people and Amazindians to reproduce? Are there any examles of this happening?

Only those who live more secluded in mountains and such

Yes, that doesn't stop and didn't stop especially niggers from Migrating from Ethiopia and SubSaharian African in general to the Arabian Peninsula or to Egypt, or to North Africa in prehistory where they mixed with Eurasian populations

makes me think

It makes total sense why non-Dravidian Indians, Iranians, and Europeans are so genetically close, having the proto-indo-european ancestor in common and all-- but why is it that Bedouins and Levantines are so close to the Indians, Europeans, and Iranians?

Unless I'm mistaken, they would have Afro-Asiatic ancestry which would render them at least as distinct from the Indo-Europeans as the Sino-Tibetans or Dravidians. Is it possible that Bedouins and Levantines were originally an Indo-European people who were only linguistically conquered by Afro-Asiatic civilizations?

How do I fix my giant nose ridge?
t. not a jew

>why is it that Bedouins and Levantines are so close to the Indians, Europeans, and Iranians
Linguistic group != genetic makeup; the spread of populations is not always simultaneous with the spread of languages.

...

capoid is an even worse term lol with it's messed up use of the term -oid (you call a dog a canine not caninoid because Dogs are the canine, you'd call a beast on another planet caninoid because it looks like a dog but of course thatch where the difference ends.).

i'mm not able to tell the difference just by their looks tbf&h

races =/= species
they can reproduce and God knows what genetic disease or advantage they might get. like when you cross a chihuahua with a tibetan mastiff

you could hire a southkorean plastic surgeon?

id rather be the nigga

I too have a giant nose ridge and i'm not a jew.
We just had bad luck with our nose aesthetics

I can use khoisan if you want, whatever. As long as FILTHY BANTU SCUM FUCKS OFF BACK TO CONGO

why?

>folks here trying to divide the world along finicky racial lines
Stay blue-piled nerds, everyone knows that ethnolinguistic groups are the real divide.

>Jewish "intellectuals"
>Frankfurt school writing
>muh ism's

seriously every other word in the paragraph ends with ism. They just write like this to confuse you so you can't see the Jewish things they're saying. Are college textbooks actually like this?

Holy shit this is actually from a college textbook and it was written by an Indian woman gender studies professor and a Frankfurt school Jew

...

>they can reproduce and God knows what genetic disease or advantage they might get. like when you cross a chihuahua with a tibetan mastiff
They would most likely exhibit outbreeding depression.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbreeding_depression

Makes you think..

Really makes (you) think

He looks like my father with a beard.