$100 cheaper

>$100 cheaper
>10% faster

AYYMD trend of being relevant for about 1 month for each release continues

Other urls found in this thread:

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Faq/What-is-the-effective-CPU-speed-
pcpartpicker.com/list/hnR9D8
pcpartpicker.com/list/cx3nRG
youtube.com/watch?v=UfNMn7RWgLw&t=1186s
pcpartpicker.com/list/CQrs3F
pcpartpicker.com/list/yN8qZ8
pcpartpicker.com/list/zJRQwV
gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-HD-630-Desktop-Kaby-Lake-vs-AMD-R7-250/m178724vsm8217
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X/3647vs3916
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

dont forget though you gotta delid

>calculated with 30% single-core, 60% quad-core and 10% multi-core scores

why is AMD processors always hot and underpowered compared to intel?

SOPA MACACO

>$90 cheaper
>on a $200 more expensive platform
>for a 9% perf increase

Nice one, Intlel.

Ryzen at their best is equal to Intel's most lazy releases

When Intel shat out the i7 920 and 2500k they were really trying

i just went down the line

7800x vs 1800x - intel 10% faster same cost

7740x vs 1700x - intel 15% faster same cost

those are the top of the line for AMD and as you see in the OP File the i5 is also faster thank the 1700x and even cheaper, no reason to keep going

OP file already shows

Workstation 58%
Go back to Sup Forums

Ryzen is best buy at the moment. If you go to any tech channel you will see that everyone is praising AMD and shitting on Intel and this is very amusing.
So yeah, enjoy your cherry picking and try not to kill yourself, ok ?

all Intel did was take out their IGP, which is the only reason Ryzen was able to "outperform" the prior intel CPUs which always come with an IGP capable of daily tasks of streaming HD video up to 4K usually without issue and other tasks

once they removed that for these X releases now they have a cheaper, less power using CPU thats also faster

Intel should just dissolve.

>if you go to sponsored blogs or youtube videos you'll see....

literally nobody is actually making gaming PCs with ryzen

I know your post is bait, but the intel one has half the number of cores. The Ryzen chip, according to the same source you posted, can process things more than twice as fast when all of its cores are being utilized.

Intel's i5 7640x is a perfect gaming CPU - much cheaper than the 7700k, but superior single core performance to most of the competition and still plenty of cores to spare. I would recommend it over Ryzen for any gaming machine.

Ryzen's 1700x, on the other hand, is great for professionals. When you're running multiple docker builds all the time or regularly have to compile large C/C++ codebases, or if you work with media, you'd really appreciate the extra threads the 1700x would provide.

>x299
>ever
even you know that's proper DOA m8

>literally nobody is actually making gaming PCs with ryzen
You're fucking retarded if you actually believe that. What do you even mean by gayming ? A bunch of kiddies buying a 1050ti and pairing it with a G4560 ?

>MORE CORES = DOING THINGS FASTER

is this 2011

>muh single core performance i need muh extra 10 fps in csgo
please leave this board and never come back thank you

no, a 7700 which is 30% better at gaming across the board and a 1080ti

>great for professionals

oh, did they patch in quad channel memory support?

do you understand the term "effective"

>BUT MUH GAYMING
>BUT MUH PAID SHILLS
You're baiting, right ? I know Intel drones are stupid, but there's no way you actually believe every major tech channel is paid by AMD to praise their products.
Whatever dude, enjoy your housefire and toothpaste.

>7700 non-k
Is this a joke?

Looks like you didn't notice that atrocious workstation score. Unless your workstation score is at least 75%, your computer is literally unusable for anything other than retro gaming.

All this intel desperate emergency shitposting is so entertaining.

do you understand the term "fug off back to ?"

...

Is this the famous NVIDIA GraphWorks(tm)?

...

>housefire
>the X intels runs within 10 watts

As we can see in this graph, a 300% increase across the board.
Nice one Intel, you've done it again.

posting userbench that for them matters only the fps count on a game as a relevant bench

>doom
>not witcher 3

you think we're stupid?

witcher 3 is still the CPU bound performance benchmark game

are you dense?

it lists 3 different "PC userbases" that it ranks the CPU as being good at

Ryzen at $100 more is slower in 2 of the 3 categories

and it doesn't even have quad channel memory support for its "professional environment use"

so its a meme CPU and once again

"MORE CORES"

whoever made that graph should be hanged

>buying X299
Stop posting

even though i said you gotta delid i still use intell i have a i5 6600k

A gaming orientated measure of CPU speed that favours single over multi core performance. Intel i7-7700K ~= 100%.
Measuring CPU performance was once straightforward, clock frequency used to scale reasonably well with real world performance. At 3 GHz clock frequency increases slowed and manufacturers starting putting more emphasis on total calculation throughput rather than raw single core performance
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Faq/What-is-the-effective-CPU-speed-

The cheapest X299 mobo in my country is $250
The cheapest B350 mobo is $60
Will you stop being retarded now ?

im sorry, this isnt a mobo discussion

>make ''better'' CPU
>make it inaccessible beacuse of the new retarded chipset it uses
>nobody buys it because it's shit
LOOK AT THESE GRAPHS, AMD FINISHED GUYS, GOING BANKRUPT RIGHT NOW

what are you going to stick your cpu into?

and?

Ryzen isnt faster at doing any task than Intel, this is a fact

also for everyone whos trying to act like they dont game then 1 simple answer

the cheapest GPU that performs on par with intel's GPU that comes intergrated is over $100 brand new

you know...since Ryzen has no graphics

for those bitching about the price of a fucking mobo

how are you going to display your non-gaming information since you're buying it to run multiple tasks and not actually game, it all uses memory

also all of those GPUs are only 1-2 gigs

the intel GPU can use 60+ gigs of memory

x299 motherboards are more expensive.
Also
>Workstation : Gunboat
Kek

>buy AM4 motherboard
>buy $100 GPU
>still $100 cheaper than the Intel option
Wew lad

>gunboat
AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAAHAAH

>it's all memory guys, no mobo needed!!!

>Ryzen isnt faster at doing any task than Intel, this is a fact
>reddit spacing all this while
it's very late to be baiting this hard

i guess you wont buy a mobo for that superb intel cpu
so whats the point then?

the fastest intel CPU vs the fastest Ryzen CPU

both with 16 gigs of RAM and the cheapest mobo for OC and GPU of equal graphics

pcpartpicker.com/list/hnR9D8

pcpartpicker.com/list/cx3nRG

are we fooling our self now?
we know 1600 is on par with 7700k
youtube.com/watch?v=UfNMn7RWgLw&t=1186s

...

>x370
>cheapest mobo for OC
Let me guess, you're just pretending to be retarded.

>Ryzen isnt faster at doing any task than Intel, this is a fact

Ryzen is flat out faster than Intel counterparts at anything, hardware wise speaking.

>GPU of equal graphics
lol

HE WAS PAID BY AMD TO BADMOUTH INTEL
EVERYONE WAS PAID BY AMD
PLS BUY INTEL

nice bait
using z170 and not z270
not having any sort of cooler
250 r5...
not using b350 chipset since we know it has the same oc capabilities as of 370

you cant be serious at all

Dance, dance! Hue chimpeater

...

MAE!

the cooler would be the same dumbass, thats why its not included

do you really need a proper answer to that stupid comment you just made?

its a comment, whey would i need an answer?

the cooler wasnt included just like the fucking PSU/CASE wasnt included, those would be the same

the costs listed are what is needed for equal performance and capabilities (Even tho the Ryzen is still slower)

I thought we were arguing about 7640x (x299) vs 1700X (AM4)

you're right, the B-series with equal RAM size to the 7700k's mobo (since you're buying the ryzen for a workbench pc...right)

really puts a dent in that 600+ dollar price just to equal performance

pcpartpicker.com/list/CQrs3F

This is 2017, where that is true more often than not now that most things have moved to being heavily threaded workloads.

Except games, of course.

>what the fuck are chipsets?

you've already been silenced

you have literal autism, you changed the subject from ryzen vs skylake x to ryzen vs kaby lake because you know skylake x is a shit value.

made it even easier, since both RAM is equal, now its only the parts specific to the CPU

pcpartpicker.com/list/yN8qZ8

pcpartpicker.com/list/zJRQwV

No just put equivalent GPU on 7700k and you are good to go.

i changed the subject to fastest of each

the OP was merely the newest CPUs

since everyone wanted to start talking about mobo prices, i switched to the fact GPUs arent embedded

intel has a better CPU with graphics and cheaper

every strawman attempted ITT was destroyed

the 7700k has 630 graphics, that GPU is only on par with the 530 per logicalinstruments.com

so its not even up to par plus only 2 gigs video memory vs 64

So is this the power of Sopa de Macaco

using the same exact website as you used for CPUs we can see that indeed 250 is miles ahead of Kaby Lakes GPU
gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-HD-630-Desktop-Kaby-Lake-vs-AMD-R7-250/m178724vsm8217

>better
only if you're a Sup Forumsermin

but no. you changed the subject from x299 vs ryzen to kaby lake vs ryzen when motherboards were mentioned because the fact that motherboards exist fucked your argument.

>actually defending x299
>shifting goalposts
>comparing integrated graphics to a dedicated GPU
>reddit spacing
b8 of the night

What's with this dead monkey meme?

UMA

SOPA

>all these amd shills bringing up x299
Who the fuck buys a x299 for a fucking i5

that GPU was chosen based on logicalincriments.com GPU hierarchy

intel shills :^)

>logicalincriments
leave and never come back

no i brought up the fact ryzen has no graphics and the cheapest up to par with intel that you can actually purcahse in retailrs (not Ebayshit) is 100+ dollars

meanwile 7700k comes with graphics and is cheaper

the OP was merely THAT cpu being faster than ryzen

everyone else wanted to bring in tertiary bullshit and they got blown the fuck out

its your website

Some subhumans from America eat them.

Well, if you ignore that 1800x is about, 200% faster than 7700k, then sure.
>BUT MUH GAYMS
Then buy 1600 it is on par with 1800x in that workload

>200%

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X/3647vs3916

>200% faster
Spoken like a true amd shill

Well, yea 160% is more like it.

>this 1 niche benchmark test for encoding

Let's be honest with our selves your going to waste the savings difference anyways.

Back in 03' when I was in grade school still a kid from San Fran moved to my small town and told me that a pair of jeans in the city cost a 100 bucks. I can only imagine what they go for now.

i just bought some jeans with elastic waist for like 50 dollars

>brings up price
>won't accept actual prices

Check any workload that isn't gaming and you will see that 1800x is 6900 with nice 50% discount, you will realise how much of a moron you are.

you mean workloads that benefit from quad channel memory?

...