Why do you keep reposting this when all it shows is Intel's embarrasingly low clockspeeds and stupidly high pricetags?
>>61781710
Levi Walker
Josiah Moore
PLATINUM 8176
8000 DOLLARS
0
0
0
DOLLARS
Charles Edwards
Who even are you people?
What kind of person would be the one to type "THANKS BASED XXXX, XXXX IS FINISHED, XXXXFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH"?
I've met a lot of people during my life but I have yet to come across someone like you.
Jason Jackson
Caleb Cruz
t. poorfag
Joshua Price
>all those posts
>years of autistic screeching about amd
wow lol
Aiden Rivera
this
it's literally a failure
anyone who even thinks of buying this probably has brain damage
Dominic Hill
>2.6GHz
>yfw the throttle kicks in
Eli Collins
Being smart with money and financially conservative != poor.
In fact it's usually the people who are smart with spending that are the opposite.
Liam Davis
>2 more cores than Threadripper
>Half the clockspeed
>Twice the price
>Hotter than the 7900X
>And fucking RAID KEYS
What the fuck Intel
Elijah Stewart
engadget.com
>Intel gave us a small preview from its own benchmarks: the 16-core i9 CPU reached a Cinebench R15 score of 3200
It would have to be running an all-core turbo of 3.6 GHz to hit those kind of Cinebench scores. That is like 800 MHz over base clock.
Either Intel is lying here or they're about to make FX-9590 look like a fucking joke. Again.
Chase Fisher
it says 18 cores now wtf?
Caleb Jones
Not seeing it.
James Richardson
Gaymers BTFO
>>>/pcbg/
Julian Powell
...
Jacob Roberts
>This repost again
TY BASED FAVELA
Easton Johnson
What a sad and depressing individual.
Isaiah Price
>inb4 new version of cinebench
Robert Fisher
Turns out it actually is running at 3.6 GHz all core. However you know what that means.
pcgamer.com
Adam Morris
MELTING SOCKETS WITH NO SURVIVORS
Leo Perry
>CB15 score for intel = 3200
>CB15 score for AMD = 3277
lower tdp and clock but higher score
:^)