So now that we have proofs that google hates fucking white males...

So now that we have proofs that google hates fucking white males, can we make Hiro to switch from captcha to something open-source?

Other urls found in this thread:

everydayfeminism.com/2013/08/racist-against-white-people/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

hiro is not a white male so he doesn't care

What company wouldn't fire him? This is bad publicity for any company so anyone with a brain would have fired him.

Why do compieniesgive a fuck about anything about money? By firing him they made me drop google services. Firing people for their opinions and skin color is racism and facism. The left should destroy google for that lack of tolerance.

You can't be racist against white people, delusional fuck.

If they didn't fire him, certainly more people would drop Google Services.

But why? Are Americans retarded? What does his views have to do with a company hiring thousands of diverse people? For fucks sake. Is he good at his job? Then fuck off and let him make money for you.

Kek

Is that right?

I'm all for what you say, user, but you know, yes they retarded. Big companies need to be politically correct, they need to have peace with those that are making them money.
If a employee tries to say things, that could put the company in danger of losing customers even if that's what's they are saying is true, then the company must let him go.

All this incident will result in is it being even less likely that any company ever takes a chance by hiring one of you fucks.

>Big companies need to be politically correct, they need to have peace with those that are making them money.
Why? Have anyone tried telling people to fuck off and continue to sell your best services on free market? Disney and Coca-Cola are racist but people still buy their shit.

Let's see how will google manage to create working code without fucking white males and using "feminist coders" and Hindus.

but why?
he literally did nothing wrong quite the opposite even, if he were a black woman they would carry him on their shoulders for saying that.
or are you saying that Americans are to dumb to read a short pdf?

You don't understand, user. Feminist opinions are the new black now, so having anti-feminist opinions would create a clash between the company and the triggered customers which would hurt sales.

It's a company not a government organization. A company can fire you if your views don't correlate with what they stand for.

Americans believe companies are people and should be judged as such. That they have the responsibility to do good and be PC and such.

>Why do compieniesgive a fuck about anything about money?
They aren't supposed to, but thanks to consumer fucks who force social responsibility onto companies (see all the bullshit work pepsi has done), they're now forced to give a fuck.

Not defending google, everyone should find alternatives and enjoy them, but this is one of those situations where consumers are getting fucked because yet again consumers crave for something they don't fully comprehend.

>and the triggered customers
Fuck them. How many real feminists are there on the Internet? 500? Regular feminists don't use computers.

>It's a company not a government organization.
What are anti-discrimination laws?
Also google has a monopoly.

Companies can't do illegal shit.
Where is your freedom of speech fat fucks?

It's certainly more than 1 (you).
Also, the media can easily spread things like :
" GOSH GOOGLE IS ANTIJEW ANTIFEMINIST FASCISTS"
As I said, the companies don't have the freedom to do whatever they want.

>Companies can't do illegal shit.
good joke
they can do whatever they want as long as they lie about it properly enough

_donald/

there are enough pajeets, liberal millennial males, and blue pilled chads to fill the jobs

And what are the normies going to do? Stop using Google?
Ha!

...

>Also google has a monopoly.
They don't actually have a monopoly. What's happening in a majority of fields they are in is that they lose money. They're offering free services that they lose money on purely to collect data and sell ads.
This is why even when others try to compete with them, unless they're microsoft/facebook/apple (which they do), they just can't compete.

So how does a government actually enforce the breakup of for instance Youtube when it's losing hundreds of millions a year?

Only in Satan USA.
Since we started fighting corruption and western companies,the western media can't shut up about how we are Nazis. Yes we are still alive and going strong. The threat isn't real. Do like Trump and tell critics to go suck a dick.

>So how does a government actually enforce the breakup of for instance Youtube when it's losing hundreds of millions a year?

You tell them that they have 1 year and that the life will always find a way.

lmao

From his letter:

>Only facts and reason can shed light on these biases, but when it comes to diversity and inclusion, Google’s left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence. This silence removes any checks against encroaching extremist and authoritarian policies.

From Reuters:

>Google Chief Executive Sundar Pichai told employees in a note on Monday that portions of the anti-diversity memo "violate our Code of Conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace," according to a copy of the note seen by Reuters.

By firing him, they silence other ideas, proving his case.

It'd be discriminatory if they fired him for being white but they fired him for essentially saying "Fuck this company".

And freedom of speech refers to the limit imposed on the government. Companies can retaliate against you for shit you say. Saying "Management is shit and so is this company" to management will get good results sometimes. Like in this case.

just boycott them.

I moved everything away from google. The only thing I still check is gmail to see if any emails from old services still go there that I need to update.

I use vid.me instead of Youtube.

Seriously fuck Google. Make the switch.

I just got banned on /qa/ for 2 days for reporting a spammer. Good job Captcha! Good job MODS!

Incorrect. I don't know why this gets propegated so much. Anyway, I do agree that Google firing him was the right thing to do. Bad publicity means less profit.

But yes, you can be racist against whites.

racism

n.
The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
n.
Discrimination or prejudice based on race.


If you think otherwise, you're either brainwashed, can't think for yourself or trolling.

the bad publicity came because they went and lied about this so called manifesto
if they didn´t noone would believe the idiocy that this thing had anything racist or sexist in it

But firing him just gave them more publicity

>Incorrect. I don't know why this gets propegated so much.

Of course it's correct. Racism requires power and privilege. Minorities with neither, who deal with oppression every day of their lives, cannot be racist. By definition.

n.
Discrimination or prejudice based on race.


Huh. Nothing in there about whites. Guess you don't know what you're talking about. :^)

Don't you have humanities courses to be studying for? xD

I was thinking about what the engineer wrote in his manifesto today at work.
He said that google has alot of programs that are used to enforce diversity in both race and gender.

So I had this idea.

Arent those programs actually discriminating against POC and women since why would google, a left leaning company, need them if they didnt actually think that they are worse hires? A left leaning company shouldnt need programs to enforce diversity if they think POC and women are just as good at the job.

It seems to me that this argument has most likely already been made but has it been refuted anywhere?

Nobody cares about your definition of the word from some musty old dictionary written by a white guy in 1863. The definition and usage of words changes over time, and the accepted definition of racism today is power plus prejudice.

everydayfeminism.com/2013/08/racist-against-white-people/

Educate yourself.

CHROME DROPPED

I'M MOVING TO NIGHTLY

Power-Discrimination
I can somewhat see how this argument can work

Privilege-Prejudice
But how the fuck are privilege and prejudice connected top each other?

>chrome
>using it in the first place
shiggy

But it's good guy Google firing a "filthy racist alt-right deplorable who probably once said nigger and posted on Sup Forums" it's good publicity.

>Are Americans retarded
Yes

the bad publicity only started when they fired him

t. someone who listens to the news

>everydayfeminism.com/2013/08/racist-against-white-people/

why do you respond to this shit bait?

>accepted
by who? you and your echo-chamber?

>Racism requires power and privilege. Minorities with neither, who deal with oppression every day of their lives, cannot be racist. By definition.

Just because some sociologist pulls a definition like that out of his ass doesn't make it true.

>everydayfeminism
>feminism
Confirmed beta cuck

You tried, kiddo. How's that humanities course going? Hahahaha. Poor thing.

Say it with me:

n.
Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

He probably made like steve shives and hid this thread

By anybody under 30, save for hicks from flyover states.

And just because you refuse to accept it, that doesn't make it any less true either. Go to any college or university on the planet and try to debate some people on how oppressed you are as a white male. Try to hold back the tears after you're embarrassed by kids half your age who are more intelligent than you.

Cuck! Cuck! Cuck! BAKAWWWWW!

See Sorry sweetie, but no. Embarrassing you idiots is too much fun, because we both know you have zero rebuttal beyond chicken noises.

This is a victory for the rationalist.

Google could either not fire the guy and thus implicates themself as being in agreement, or they could fire him and paint themselves are the neo-inquisition rooting out political unorthodoxy.

You can't play chess without losing a few pawns

>Sorry sweetie

t. Troll

Jordan B Peterson is going to interview that guy soon.

You really don't need to. If their policy is hiring idiots with rainbow-colored hair as opposed to people needed for the job, they will very quickly stop being the Google that made it big and someone else will replace them. It's just the transient nature of things.

I'm already doing the switch
>AOSP+FDroid
>Any other email service other than Gmail
>Maps.me rather than Google maps
>Poweramp rather than Play Music
>Any not-chromium based web browser

What about web search and youtube?

Time to switch to the better master.

And Google just proves conservatives right once again.

Good idea. Thought about the same. I don't know how anybody can cuck themselves to use their new captcha that takes forever to solve.
Legacy captcha won't be around forever.

I think you've missed the rest of that memo. Firing people for their opinions and skin color is racism and facism but it's okay if it's done against people who think differently than we do. It's a lost fucking cause. That's why I hate Sup Forums so much, not because they're wrong but because they're delusional spergs not realizing that while they whine and shitpost about white race fading into history the black and uneducated masses of non-whites increase their population by 80 millions every single year.

t. BTFO

>androidfags BTFO

Because Sup Forums is right.
It's all about muh diversity and snowflakes.

>waah waah why can't i be a sexist prick

>Racism requires power and privilege
So who got fired then?

You do realize he's being ironic? That's literary how "muh diversity" fags think

The point is that 80% of males are bunch of beta faggots who will always follow, and I mean it in a wider meaning that just giving away your crush to Chad in college. They will never say a word, they will always obey the person in charge. And in this case it means that they will accept their worsening state of working among SJWs and Pajeets.

wat

Good. I read the whole thing.

He was a stupid pretentious faggot.

The white guy in a cushy job at one of the biggest companies on the planet. Which still wasn't enough for him, so he had to demand that he didn't have to work around any, UGH, minorites. Literally proving my point here.

????

lol

nice.

>>>>>>>>>

That was not at all what he said.

Learn the difference between systematic racism and social racism, dumbfuck.

what did he say then

it's an anime site, here's your (you).

>says nigger
>says pajeet
>says chink
>says spic
>when its about you honkeys
>whitetears.gif

Fucking pussies go to

*thumbs up emoji*

"i swear if that motherfucking streetshitting shitskin subhuman CEO comes around here i'm gonna gas him"
--big jim "nagasaki the paki" damore, infamous aryan brotherhood figurehead

so you just gave up
gg

the truth

can you be any more vague

Google is under investigation by a federal agency right now for gender discrimination. I think they care about that a bit more than you using their free services, especially when you'll come crawling back in a couple of weeks.

yes

it would help to know what he got fired for, having read the memo, i don't see anything but just plain unbiased facts

This. Pretending to be 'above it all' while pushing for his own (right-wing political views). He also makes a jab at communism which shows he has no fucking idea what he's talking about.
>communism is about oppressor and oppressed
No, faggot, when your surplus labour is stolen by the owners of the means of production and when you are reduced to a machine working for a wage that is called exploitation. No, this 'ideology' cannot be applied to racism, sexism, etc. He's a fool who's had his head up his ass for far too long, patting himself on the back for his 'classic liberal' views.

They fired him because he is a moron. This is obvious to anyone with an IQ over 100 who reads his inane drivel.

>having read the memo, i don't see anything but just plain unbiased facts
Either you didn't read the memo, or you don't know what bias means, or you don't know what fact means.

Recommended increasing cooperation in Google (one example he gave was to widely introduce pair programming) as a way to attract more female job applicants to Google.

what did you find bad or wrong about it?

Why don't you start by listing off some unbiased facts you found.

i don't recall anything that wasn't, so that would be pointless, this is why i'm asking, what did i miss?

This is the Milgram Experiment. I recommend it as a rare example of worthwhile social science/psychology research

facts are by definitino unbiased

let's hear your objections to this angry right-wing anti-diversity racist screed

So you can't list even one?

What were some facts produced in the memo?

...