Really makes you think

How different would Mexico be today, if France colonized it instead of Spain?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_intervention_in_Mexico
twitter.com/AnonBabble

We would be faggots, full of muslims and niggers

/thread

WE WUZ FROGZ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_intervention_in_Mexico

They would be Haiti tier bad

We would have black polulation.

Would be more gay, more alcoholic, more classy, more muslim, more dark but would still butthurt Americans

Difficult to say. Mexico was colonized really early in reality, I imagine the French wouldn't have really populated it until the mid 1600s or something. Assuming Euros would have still contacted them earlier, by then the functioning states of Mesoamerica might have recovered from plagues, so you'd end up with something more like India or Indonesia where France would have been slightly more hands-off and native nations would slowly get pulled together under a colonial economic system and then become a protectorate. There'd be wars of colonial control but maybe not the heavy migrations that the Spaniards did.

Check french colonies

Would make you guys have to learn French instead of Spanish to deal with illegal immigrants and drug lords, that alone would be already an overall better scenario

>french
>better than spanish
pls be in london

so slightly better then

Nah you know their country is shit when they have to call Brazil to keep the peace

It is though.
Or unironically migrate to here for a better life

So...just like now ?

Are Québécois or Cajuns blacks ?

Piss off desu

Mexico don't has any of these things desu.

...

>tfw france was white once
What went wrong?

There are black Cajuns

left + "hey, African workers, bring your families !!!"

>

Well maybe

I don't think it would change a lot. In general, the output depended more on the local natural conditions than on the metropolis.

Sure, deforestation and all that jizz, but both halves of the island were already quite different in resources and potential before colonization.

Mexico doesn't have any of those things**
Beaner

A way better place.

>Sure, deforestation and all that jizz
>jizz
had a giggle. good effort, brasilbro, but the expression is "jazz", not "jizz'"

that's an elevation map

>pls be in london
explain this meme

Lurk more summerfag

Yes, it is. And wet winds come from the East to the West, so it rains far more on DR than on Haiti.

Sustainability in the former is easier than in the later, and since no metropolis really cared about improving the colonies outside what profits the most, both were explored, but for Haiti it was a bit too much.

In other words, blaming the frogs is silly.

...well, fuck.
Thank you for pointing it out.

im not a summerfag, just dont care enough about about memes or people spamming L O N D O N to learn about it

iirc it was as simple as some uk femanon posting an attractive selfie of herself, and some guy responded with "pls be in london".

his best response is a ">"