Gentleman

Gentleman.

How do we fix it?

Other urls found in this thread:

globalfarmernetwork.org/2016/06/open-letter-to-the-eu-parliament-from-a-kenyan-farmer-leave-africa-alone/?utm_source=Weekly Newsletter&utm_campaign=b145052c70-Open_Letter_to_the_EU_Parliament_from_a_6_2_2016
votre-geste.ccfd-terresolidaire.org/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Responsible investment, sustainable development and human rights of course!

Well, white government and apartheid were good starting points.

Recolonisation. Even parts of the African populace support the concept because they realize that most of their continent has gone backwards since the decolonisation. People who can't drive a car shouldn't be allowed to, and people who can't run a country shouldn't be allowed to.

Already perfect

>inb4 Empire of Dust webm

AFRICA 2016

Genocide and then recolonization. Maybe it'll encourage population growth in Europe and East Asia.

>Apartheid
>Good starting point

Just give it all to China

t. Mutumbu de Favela

>East Asia.
Who cares? Weaboo scum.

Why don't you kill them instead apartheid?

surround with wall

fuck off

>whites breeding less than developed countries and blacks breeding more than poverty filled countries is a good starting point

cheap workforce

There's apartheid in America but it things haven't improved much for blacks

No way, we need those battery resources.

It doesn't work. Come on, America, Brazil, South Africa...

Like said, plus refusal of participating in corruption in anything (hosting money from dicators, looking the other way because of investments opportunities)

More like close association pacts. Colonisation implies pillage in the more or less long term in its meaning. It was also used to initiate a demographics shift and basically destroying black ethnicities in the 19th century (Settlement colonies, anyone ?)

t. Ahmed

FUCKING ANGOLA

How is life there?

The only answer.

Globalism should only be done by developed countries.

Just leave the alone and let them be tribal. Europe for the Europeans, Asia for asians, Africans for Africans, ect

That's because they generally don't improve anything.

China is buying Angola, literally.

Maybe shoulde we just get out, and just let the Arficans decide by themselves?

>Genocide
> kill them

Good to see you're still as edgy as a cutting sword, Sup Forums.

shit

Are you rich? I heard that if you're not rich in Mexico life is also shit

shut up

Swap Lithuania with Madagascar

kek, I see more Anglolan posters than I do South Africans

Why is there a machette in your flag?

The Occident will never release its grasp on Africa, and sometimes for the better. (we basically saved Mali, I guess that makes up a bit for neocolonialism)

You can't. It's a ticking timebomb. At the end of this century Nigeria alone will have a population of 1 billion.

And you know were the surplus niggers will head? That's right. To Europe.

The only solution would be to genocide the whole continent. But that's obviously unethical and thus unfeasible.

It is probably me because I've never seen another angolan poster

The machete is just communist bulshit

We don't need to destroy them, it would already be useful to stop them from breeding like rabbits. Also in large parts of Africa there's easily enough space for a couple of Europeans.

Umph, Your argument doesn't convinces me, mate.

White people

Stop giving them free shit so they can build their economy.

For example:
>UN sends free food
>local African farmers obviously cannot compete with free food
>they say fuck it, stop working and take the free stuff like everyone else does

This is true, give them training instead so they can do their own shit

Pretty right, Tbh.

Meh, that's pretty much true everywhere you go.

Upper class, enough in the bank to be a neet for a couple of years.

That's already what we're doing through humanitarian aid, though. It goes mainly towards women education for a reason.

At the beginning of the 20th century, one person out of five was white, Africa was becoming a giant white colony with its native population slowly pushed away.

Demographics projections are warming more than actual predictions : "If we don't do something, here's what will happens."

I'm glad to see that *someone* recognise Genocide as unethical, though.

human capital is pretty fucking abysmal though which is why nobody is willing to front capital for teaching and training them.

I read an article of a Kenyan economist who actually argued in that direction. His stance was basically that the whole economy becomes dependent on development aid handouts from the national government.

So instead of businessmen you have politicians running the economy.

Only wise post ITT

How on earth can thay do the opposite of every other football team? What are we doing wrong up here??

Are you an actual Angolan or just passing by?

I'm being practical. Bolloré, Areva, and many other have built empires that are beyond the authorities of any nation on the spoils of colonisation. And on the other hand, African dictators pays fortunes to get their kids at Sciences-Po, have luxury flats in Paris, and probably Swiss bank account as well.
The shift of control must be progressive.

This "free shit" is vital for their survival. Documentaries I watch says that African soils are used to feed live stock in Europe.

So in a bad year of terrible harvests, we should not help prevent famine to protect the few farmers who still have crops? Makes no sense.

I agree with helping in other ways than food as a primary goal, but if we don't send food, they die. Literally.

globalfarmernetwork.org/2016/06/open-letter-to-the-eu-parliament-from-a-kenyan-farmer-leave-africa-alone/?utm_source=Weekly Newsletter&utm_campaign=b145052c70-Open_Letter_to_the_EU_Parliament_from_a_6_2_2016

>Documentaries I watch says

See france? This is why no one takes you seriously.

votre-geste.ccfd-terresolidaire.org/

It's in French, but basically their point is :

1) Food is now traded at high-frequency with little regards to actual stocks, making occasionally prices surges at the worst moments
2) A huge part of African land is owned by oligarch (whited AND blacks) who exports it lucratively as food for European livestock.

>So in a bad year of terrible harvests, we should not help prevent famine to protect the few farmers who still have crops?
Aid for a famine isn't the same as flooding African markets with Western food exports

honestly only real solution is to take the top 20-25% of africans, let them breed and sterilize the bottom.

there's a lot of smart and productive people in africa, but its vastly outweighted by useless people. natural selection happened in every civilization in the world due to wars, mass famines and other shit happening due to population density.

africans have not really have had dense population and major wars and famines until the last 100 years, and didn't have natural selection happening as long as europe and asia has had.

Thought it was Germany for a sec

>france
>He talk with one french guy
>"see france?"

Obviously 67 millions people all thinks like that.

You smart guy.

Mean to be honest

African food is exported instead of sold to the local market because it's more lucrative to feed cows in Yurop than people in Niger, and because wheat prices fluctuate heavily through the stock exchange.

It's easy, kill all humanitarian educated people and give power to the engineers and technicians.
Also, hang all fags.

Germany needs more Africans.

t. Crane poster

t. Hangman.

Ok, you have my attention now.

you can't

That's all m8.
There is literally no problem in earth that cant be solved with killing all humanitaries and empowering tech.

most of south-east asia exports food, but they aren't starvation tier. the reason being is that average productivity of farms are way higher due to better farming practices.

i mean, half of africa imports food because they simply cannot feed their population with their current agricultural productivity.

>African food is exported instead of sold to the local market because it's more lucrative to feed cows in Yurop than people in Niger, and because wheat prices fluctuate heavily through the stock exchange.
This isn't what I was talking about at all

The bottom 75% will let itself be sterilised gently ? The top 25% (full of corrupt dictators and autocrats) will let their flock go away and their power be destroyed ?

Africans intellectuals will let 75% of their people behind ?

I know you're talking about an already implausible scenario, but that just doesn't make sense.

They need transgenics, but some faggots in the EU don't want them to because they are fucking morons.

Maybe should we hug it?

GMOs

Why gently? What African intellectuals?

I misunderstood you, then. But I think stopping aid won't do shit.

Edgy ! Techs don't know shit about running anything else than a little business.

t. engineering student.

Are you Angolan or just a proxy?

How is life like there? Better than other african countries? I heard that it was used as a site for mass deportations

>they need schemes where they have to buy overpriced new seeds from Monsanto every year and get sued for all their belongings if they use them in an unauthorized way

...

Techs know everything.
They just dont run around screaming about it like hummies do.

leave it alone
nature will sort it out

>Why gently?
Then you're advocating for waging war on a continent for his own sake.

>What African intellectuals?
I must say that besides a few journalists, I don't have too many names.

>Better than other african countries
Sad and laughing at the same time

>But I think stopping aid won't do shit.
I meant that exporting massive amounts of food to Africa makes it impossible for local farmers to develop. They become dependent on the West instead of becoming self sufficient like they should

Legitimate aid is fine

Recolonization

Estas pero bien pendejo, los GMOs son cancerigenos y todos los genes son de monsanto, ¿Porque crees que maseca es gringa? Todos los elotes fueron contaminados con genes de monsanto.

Y digo literalmente "genes de monsanto" porque monsanto los tiene registrados.

its deeper than that. organization of markets, management of farms, everything from the farmer all the way to government policies are pretty abysmal in africa.

there's just no one band-aid solution to africa. its a fuckton of problems, a lot of it cultural and social.
not gently. but humans have killed off its bottom class through mass famines, wars and natural disasters for centuries.

population density usually leads to good genes passing on more, and less productive and aggressive people to naturally kill themselves off because they cannot find a role in a functional society.

honestly, alot of economics and sociology tends to ignore the fact that we are still animals undergoing evolution. we are today evolving where humans capable of understanding modern technology/markets/society will create stable families and pass off their genes.

Genocide and then move in whites and east asians

Techies I study with can't place Sweden on a map, have troubles with the most basic economy and philosophy concepts, and can barely write French without sounding like a 13 years old, talk about anything abstract other than maths or physics, or read more than 30 consecutive lines.

They are great at solving maths problems, though, no doubt.

>and east asians
No thanks, the PRC can get fucked

Redraw borders based on ethnicity rather than old imperial borders
Industrialize the more populated areas
Implant wide-scale mechanized agriculture

Done

>Techies I study with can't place Sweden on a map
>French education

Do you know why Monsanto holds a monopoly on this?

It's because you fucking idiots don't stop making GMOs so hard to develop because you think it's dangerous. They are not. They have the potential to save millions of people from starvation by producing more food, with better quality in less land, less time and with less pesticides.

Deja de repetir estupideces, los transgénicos no causan cáncer. El único puto estudio que lo """demuestra""" lo hizo un francés cuyo estudio ha sido desaprobado por todo el maldito mundo.

Todas las demás especies de plantas comestibles también están registradas, sean transgénicas o no. Carajo.

For living in a part of africa, we dont
People in africa are lazy because of hot weather and natural ressources. They dont need to work and the few that does dominates the rest by violence

Thats why corruption is such a big deal in africa, at every scale of african society.
The only way to get a better society is to get all the diaspora that had to work to go back to their countries and build a society based on democracy and liberalism, even of they have to chase all the original inhabitants that dont want that new society

> humans have killed off its bottom class through mass famine

I disagree with your organic view of humanity. We are a society as well as a species.

The optimal form of humanity as a species was the state of nature Rousseau described anyway. Alone, nomadic, savage, basically a solitary ape, meeting only for mating, living as nature intended.

You don't need "economy or philosophy" to run a country, math and common scene, those are the keys.

eh, there's different flavors of technocrats.

combining economists/social organizers with ones really good at solving in depth problems is the way to go. its why google for example employs analysts alongside engineers.

humans are naturally predisposed towards cooperation where each part works efficiently at one general task.

I'm memeing a bit - more accurate would have been Bulgaria, for example - but over-specialisation is a true thing here.

They can look at a matrice of infinite dimension with weird stuff inside and instantly deduces its proprieties. They are beasts in math. But try to have a serious discussion about philosophy, or history, and either you end up schooling them and shutting up because you feel awkard or it's :

>shut up philo is so useless xD I got 7 at bac
>did you at least follow the methodology ?
>what's a methodology xD

this is naturally a retarded argument.

southern china, india and south east asia are all equatorial. yet they are productive. really the issue is that there's just a fundamental lack of cooperation and productivity among african cultures.

prehistoric humans always lived communally, it isn't at all like what rousseau would describe.

humans are surely social animals, but for example let's say you have a group of birds where half of them store their seeds for the winter and the other half don't. one of them will be weeded out because they cannot survive but the group of birds collectively continue.

>You don't need "economy (...)" to run a country

LMAO

I agree with you. Which is why our school forces us to take at least 35% humanities classes and it feels good.

Asia is an old populated regions, civilizations and people clashed and had to work to survive, which is not the case for africa, at least subsaharan. They were isolated from the rest of the world and could live without working

Rousseau described an Utopia. Himself doubted that it existed.

The second best form was prehistoric communities in which you lived fast and died young, not old enough for feeling of jealousy to appear.

honestly, philosophy can be a bunch of nonsense if you take it literally. it wasn't even rousseau i'm pretty sure it was Hobbes.

anyways, its easier if you understand human societies from a biological or anthropological perspective. the fact is that prehistoric humans would have been more aggressive and violent towards strangers than other humans, simply because the more cooperative and friendly humans did not outweight the violent aggressive ones.

over-time violent and aggressive ones were killed off through laws and other ways and friendlier ones survive. its why poor people don't instinctively murder each other in russia like they do in brazil.