/asean/- Gyaru edition

We need more gyaru in this region 2bh famalam

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0voZMuSrMr0
youtu.be/_VKWLC87Uzw
youtu.be/2jDqWjF-4Zk
youtube.com/watch?v=ZDEbsZpweDo
i.4cdn.org/int/1468232444196.png
youtube.com/watch?v=jH7-PQJOkzI
nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2013/10/27/south-china-sea/
thejakartapost.com/news/2016/07/04/jokowi-arm-wrestles-son-in-youtube-video.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>tfw no asean bf

MAYOR ANG NAUNA

MAYOR LOVES CHINA AND ABU SAYAFF

GIVE UP FLIPS

AWAKEN MY MASTER

PUTANG INA SI MEYOR AY DRUG LORD PALA!?

Suck my dick faggot

A N I M E S
N
I
M
E
S

The very problem in Spratlys is that we are not the only one who's claiming it, that's why we don't get the full support of other ASEAN countries like Vietnam and Malaysia, and western countries like UK and France is ready to drop its support anytime if China only makes economic deals with them, which they are in need right now. Just take a look at Poland.

Even if the the tribunal court finally declares us as the winner of the case, we won't expect China to leave the disputed area, we really need bilateral talks with China to finally ease the tension between two countries, this will never be resolved by the international court alone.

>tfw no gf

youtube.com/watch?v=0voZMuSrMr0

SI MAYOR AY MACHO PALA

This guy is right, the international court can't do anything because they can't back up what they're saying through the use of force.

China simply won't listen. This is why we need nukes.

So what is the logic for them that the bilateral talk is a good one? Do they expect that China will give us a good deal? Because let' say an 70-30(I'm being generous here) was agreed it is as good as we are surrendering our rights. Then again is their end game is just to stop this issue with China then bilateral talk is the fastest way??

>we won't expect China to leave the disputed area, we really need bilateral talks with China to finally ease the tension between two countries, this will never be resolved by the international court alone.

Wasn't it a consequence that you brought the case to ICJ?
Chinks won't listen to you. never
What you need now is to use the power of the USA and bring their allies into this issue.
We should get rid of chinks from world organization and call stop trading with chinks.
I always stand with you lads.

youtu.be/_VKWLC87Uzw
>Donkey Sex: The Most Bizarre Tradition
> Having sexwithdonkeysis apartofgrowing upfor some of the local boys on thenortherncoast of Colombia
Is that true, Columbianon?

Basically, China will have all the leverage if any smaller nation (PH, VT, ID, MS) goes the bilateral way with them. That's why the countries embroiled in territorial disputes against them go the multilateral way.

Funny thing is that some of the militants I've talked to prefer bilateral talks rather than multilateral talks. I can't udnerstand why since the reasons they give are rather hollow.

All disputed ASEAN nations are member of AIIB.
why do you Aseans stick to rely on Chinese economy so much, even tho your clay is about to be cucked?

Show us your resistance and need a declare to show your soul by leaving from commie monetarily organization.

Dont clump us with the rest of you. We dont have island dispute with china. Its only EEZ dispute and we are ready to defend it by all means. We dont settle for less.

youtu.be/2jDqWjF-4Zk

Will leave this for ERP FAGS

>why do you Aseans stick to rely on Chinese economy so much

Obviously because we benefit better in AIIB than ADB, the same reason why we still trade with China despite the tensions. Philippines knows better than completely closing its doors to a neighbor with trillions of worth of GDP.

Because it's better to trade with your enemy than fight him, and we don't really have any equipment to gather the resources in Scarborough Shoal, we might as well ask China to pick it up for us.

How does it feel to officially be white?

we have no leverage for them to pick it up for us

they will just keep it and sell it back to us

bilateral talk=sweetened way of giving them the islands.

That's what the talks is for m8

If this were of consensus from you all, I would say no words left for you.

I squeeze the mayonnaise into the egg


MAYONEGG

It means we won't get a good and fair 50-50 deal with them. It would be something like 80-20 in favor of China. In other words, they will get most of the islands.
China has too much military and economic leverage so we can't expect 50-50 outcomes during bilateral talks.

You guys are very submissive and sound very weak.

Talks would be too one sided though.

What do you mean sound very weak? We already are even way beyond very weak. You are talking to a third world country with basically zero war potential

We will not fight a war we can never win because it's a waste of money, waste of time, waste of manpower, it's too expensive to get involved in a war.

And we are a 3rd world country, what do you fucking expect?

Wew lads

>You are talking to a third world country with basically zero war potential

You mean you are not going to fight if the chinks invaded your main land because you are a country with zero war potential?

youtube.com/watch?v=ZDEbsZpweDo

>Be Chinese
>Considered white

Feels goof 2bh

might aswell give the abusayaf thier long awaited freedom form the theis fraudulent republic

whats next? taiwan asserting territory over the east philippine sea? or maybe batanes\babuyan islands? whats next? the successful cessation of muslim mindanao from the philippines? whats next cebu or palawan annexing themselves? (the proposal happened during edsa 2, cebu being sick of all these politics hampering economic growth) or how about zamboanga? zamboanga being its own republic after the end of spanish colonization and initially recognized by the US as one at the start of their american occupation

the whole it's not just China that claims to own this can easily be solved, by ASEAN copying EU fishery policy. Basically, all ASEAN countries can fish on each other's waters with limits and everyone else can fuck off.

The time for talks is over desu, the chinks has cast the dye by building that base, they won't give that up.

Sharing EEZ (or the division issue itself might be the hardest thing to negotiate). I dont think China would oppt for 50-50.. and I dont think we deserve less than 50 as well.

checking with muh shaved pubes

I feel superior a little bit

Study Method With SEMEN -comic edition-

i.4cdn.org/int/1468232444196.png
Can you find me picture of male symbol dicking other male symbol? Preferably with curve.

I said show your own soul with a pose protesting against china with team ASEAN to leave AIIB to make them not to have more powers in your Areas.

Trading with someone doesn't mean we're giving away our territory. Why do you assume we're dropping our claims in Spratly's?

hi

we might as well if we go bilateral

Will he do it? If he does I will be okay with him to be honest

>mfw gyaru porn

That's why bilateral talks shouldn't be an option except maybe as a last resort.

What"s the verdict my Flip bros?

AWOO~

Believe in our guy Duterte.

probably not anymore since leni is our VP

>Cameron announces he's resigning earlier and walks off humming
he must be so happy that he doesn't have to deal with this shit show lol

youtube.com/watch?v=jH7-PQJOkzI

MPHGA

best President Reagan still looking after you

South China Sea belongs to China

britshit deserves becoming 3rd world country. i dont know i even care what happens in that shit country since brexit, they're too arrogant to think they are EU's life support and i hope them the best in the future lol

fuck britshit

What else can we trade that they dont already have?
specially if they get those resources and territory

who /tauntandflaunt/ here?

Bilateral talks won't prosper as long as China dictates the terms. Multilateral talks, however, won't happen too unless PH wins the arbitration case against China.

The islands are ours and they are invading our territory, they are trespassing our sovereignty because they wanted the natural resources in the area. If they are going to stay there for a while, then they should just help us pick up the natural resources there. We already know they aren't going away so we may as well just make the profit out of it.

I don't have any slightest idea how the fuck did we lose Scarborough Shoal though.

>as long as China dictates the terms

What makes you think China's going to dictate the terms? That's our island, if they want to put something on the table then they may do so, but they are in no position to demand what they want, that's not how bilateral talk works.

>The islands are ours and they are invading our territory,

the don't see it that way for them its their resources to take

I bet you even if we make a deal as unfair that it is we would still end up paying for those resources that they """pick for us"""

Nukes and military

The problem with bilateral talks is that it's not like the country has some negotiating power over this issue, I fear that the outcome might favor Chinese interests.
Worst case scenario, Duterte might favor shared fishing rights.

Bilateral talks with China will only destabilize and worsen the situation because it does not only concern China and Philippines, but the rest of ASEAN. China should not even have any say on this, but they are an ambitious, rising superpower.
Multilateral talks with all of ASEAN, and with US-China as mediators, is the way to go.

>I'm not a real girl, I'm a ladyboy~

Mother of god...

>the don't see it that way
They have to now, we are guaranteed to win the case against them and they had to respect us.
Exactly, we are not the only claimant of Spratlys, we are in very good terms with Brunei and Vietnam. This is why we need to talk to China because not only we own the Spratlys but other ASEAN countries are part of the conflict as well.
>US
China doesn't want US in the talks, that's why the attempts for multilateral talks has been very unsuccessful.

multilateral talks, in large part because it frankly would have the upper hand in those negotiations. Bilateral negotiations would also frankly require multiple negotiations, with several countries, given the Spratly case. As such, agreements made in bilateral talks may or may not be viable, as other countries not involved in the talks may raise issues. Frankly, no reason to favor bilateral over multilateral talks from the PH point of view.

>China doesn't want US in the talks, that's why the attempts for multilateral talks has been very unsuccessful.

They have to now, we are guaranteed to win the case against them and they had to respect us.

I think kicking the US base in the philippines should have never happened. the US were the ones patrolling that area for free and china never attempted to get in there. when we kicked the US bases out, thats when the chinese problem creeped in, slowly but surely. south korea and japan knew that kicking the US bases from their country is a stupid idea, and never thought of doing so even until now. but in the philippines, ultranationalism, political dramantics prevailed over pragmatism.

Here's a business idea: A tour into the disputed waters. See chink ships up close! Meet hostile chinks and experience the water cannon LIVE! You also get free stopover at the BRP Sierra Madre.

>no reason to favor bilateral over multilateral talks from the PH point of view.

I know, but what can we really do in this situation?

Don't settle for bilateral wining the case or not

bbc, new york times and other intl news orgs already did that

nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2013/10/27/south-china-sea/

>the US were the ones patrolling that area for free and china never attempted to get in there

More like China was militarily inferior back then and we had all the chances to attest our claims in Spratlys. We are fucking idiots to be honest, I always find it hard to believe that one of our island got stolen by Vietnam because of a fucking birthday party. Same reason why we totally lost Sabah.

We have never won a dispute, we lost Miangas Island from Indonesia, we lost Sabah from Malaysia, we lost an island to Vietnam, and we're about to lose this. We really are a nation of idiots.

we should just give up being a country

I will monetize it for public consumption.

>but they are in no position to demand what they want,

neither do we that's why we need multilateral with the USA

Our situation is bad but not this kind of bad; however, if we lost any of the island, even as small as our newly acquired Benham Rise then I fucking give up on this country.

>But Ayungin is different. In the reef’s shallows there sits a forsaken ship, manned by eight Filipino troops whose job is to keep China in check.

its like a row of dominoes, if one goes the rest will follow

That's a bad analogy

So you're saying that we should play chess without a single piece. Not even a King.

My friends mom is Indon who married bule.
She is playing on his WoW account, what should I say to her?

"Las Malvinas son Argentinas!"

"Aku makan kontol gan wkwkwkwkwk"

more gyaru!

Or a leaking dam

The water being separation

"malaysia BOLEH #1"

>She is playing on his WoW account
but why

or me married to (You)

me asking for a divorce

If duts follow The daang matuwid plan we will have them by 2020

Which I doubt

Either way we would have had a better chance to repel them if the bases were still here
And not like want we are doing today, walloing in despair
And Using drug addicts as a Distraction

Dutdut should just capture all the druggies and sell them as slaves to China

Wjhy do people read Mocha Uson when she's a Marcos loyalist?

idk she does all his boring/grinding stuff for him

She like duts, but really a Marcos apologist too?

>thejakartapost.com/news/2016/07/04/jokowi-arm-wrestles-son-in-youtube-video.html
What did he mean by this ?